- Joined
- Feb 18, 2005
- Messages
- 5,847 (0.81/day)
- Location
- Ikenai borderline!
System Name | Firelance. |
---|---|
Processor | Threadripper 3960X |
Motherboard | ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming |
Cooling | IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12 |
Memory | 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16 |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data) |
Display(s) | 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz) |
Case | Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans |
Power Supply | Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W |
Mouse | Logitech G602 |
Keyboard | Razer Pro Type Ultra |
Software | Windows 10 Professional x64 |
The main reason that I buy Xeon is because it has better support in server platforms and also provides ECC capability for the servers I build. i7's and i5's do not support ECC
Celeron, Pentium and i3 do support ECC though, and for most home servers/NASes those chips will be more than good enough.
So what is the point of this? PCIe lanes?
These "Xeons" are simply Coffee Lake chips with a few bridges cut to enable ECC support and slightly different clock bins, and of course the price hiked - that's it. Allowing Intel to get more money from enterprise customers is the only point.
The "up to 40 PCIe lanes" is a new, sleazy Intel marketing strategy of combining the CPU and chipset lanes to make it look like the platform is far better than it is. I would love to see AMD hit back at this with a Ryzen marketing campaign, something along the lines of "our consumer CPUs support ECC, why can't yours Intel?" and/or "real CPUs have 24 real PCIe lanes".
Home server = ryzen easy, supports ECC.
In a small business it'd be maybe some ryzen embedded, threadripper or ofc xeon who all have official support for such application and thus are priced higher than a consumer ryzen which also supports it all unofficially as it's up to motherboard vendor.
But with consumer parts you usually can't go screaming to the vendor that it doesn't work as a server
There are a lot of claims floating around that Ryzen doesn't have "true" ECC, it just supports ECC memory. And even though the Ryzen CPU does, it's up to the motherboard vendors whether they want to support ECC on their boards - many do not. Finally, the Ryzen APUs do not support ECC, which means if you are building a home server you need a discrete GPU, which means you need a board with at least 2 PCIe slots if you want/need to run something like a RAID card, which rules out an mITX storage build.
It's funny to see people whinge about these products when they have always been very compelling alternatives to the normal i5/7 lineup...
The quad core HT variants of these might become very interesting alternatives next to the 4c4t i3s and 6c6t i5s
What exactly makes these chips more compelling than the Core line? 100MHz extra boost clocks?