• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Editorial NVIDIA's Move From GTX to RTX Speaks to Belief in Revolutionary Change in Graphics

Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.53/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 5600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 6700 10GB SWFT 309
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703 (TTC Gold 60M)
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (Gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Steve hit every nail on the head. Especially from 13:00 onward.
"For now Ray-Tracing looks to be more hype than anything, and nVidia are using this to hide the fact they don't actually have anything new to sell"
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
2,963 (0.85/day)
Location
Long Island
Also I didn't notice a big difference when RTX is turned on.

But isn't that kinda like looking at Motioin Blur comparisons between 60 hz and 144 hz on a 60 hz monitor ? Until the engine is designed for RT, you wont be able to see it.

Also I didn't notice a big difference when RTX is turned on. I don't think the performance drop will be worth the minuscule visual quality improvement (unless the game devs crack their knuckles and actually do something nice). Currently ambient occlusion does enough already but pushing gaming graphics to new heights doesn't hurt. I can wait for all the benchmarks with RTX on/off.

But isn't that kinda like looking at Motioin Blur comparisons between 60 hz and 144 hz on a 60 hz monitor ? Until the engine is designed for RT, you wont be able to see it.

Jay did a summary which explained a few things. Worth a look;

I was tempted to look but after watching him drill the circuit traces on a motherboard to mount a CPU cooler, as well as his water cooling videos, I just can't take anything he does seriously. 15 seconds in I have flashbacks to that drill scene. :0

Actually, unless a youtube video is associated with a print web review site, I just don't watch. HardwareCanucks' case reviews is one i do look at. Looking forward to Wiz's return from Brazil.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
131 (0.05/day)
Processor Haswell-E - i7-5820K @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99S
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Palit Super JetStream 980Ti
Storage SSD: 512GB [Crucial MX100] HDD: 34TB [4 x 6TB WD Blue, 2 x 5TB Seagate External]
Display(s) Acer ProDesigner BM320 4K
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
PS5/XB2 is threatening to eclipse PC gaming. They will never hit PC level graphical power but the difference is reducing to the naked eye with each generation.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2015
Messages
2,963 (0.85/day)
Location
Long Island
$1200 is almost the same as $700? $800 is almost the same as $500? Maybe you can find one or two board partner cards out od dozens for something like $50 less but NVIDIA's "MSRP" does not really exist.

You accounting for inflation and the 25% US tariffs in there ? If ya do, the 1080 ius actually significantly cheaper than 10xx series and the 1070 is $2 more.

I guess will see in 2-3 months what AMD has to give to the table, but knowing how they'd compete in the last years, they most likely have something that's on the same performance levels as the 1080Ti...

Accounting for the huge difference in Overclock abilyty, AMD hasn't been competitive at the top end in years ..

With 7xx series, nVidia crushed AMDs marketing campaign for the 290x by taking dusting off the 1080 Ti design they had sitting on the shelf ... and as it turned out, when both overclocked, the 780 was faster than the 290x. Then the 970 came out and nVidia took the top 3 tiers with nVida selling 2+ times more than all AMDs 2xx and 3xx series combined. There was an illusionary battle for supremacy at the 1060 vs 480 level, but when OC'ing was figured in, the weak OC ability of AMD cards left it 10% behind. The 1060 took over as the most popiular card in steam's hardware survey, a position previously held by the 970. Here I think nVidia will be trying to establish a new tier ... something that can actually drive a 4k monitor with motion blur reduction . Im hoping so cause if they push to establish dominance down to the 1050 level that pushes AMD to almost the point of irrelevancy.

I don't see nVidia doing that as it could lead to ant-trust or other regulatory concerns ... It also doesn't seem like a good idea for AMD. The idea that AMD has something up their sleeve to challenge the Ti is hard to swallow, they haven't competed at the top end since the 7xxx series, and that's 6+ years ago. I think AMDs best move is to start at the bottom up... head off any challenge posed by the 2050 and, instead of putting a card out to challenge the 2070, take that card and price between the 2060 and 2070 and make it a competitive choice over the 2060. in other words what nVidia did with the 970 .... at a relatively small price increase over the 960 and AMDs offering, it killed. And that's where the volume sales are.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
2,208 (0.44/day)
System Name Ultima
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard MSI Mag B550M Mortar
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 240 rev4 w/ Ryzen offset mount
Memory G.SKill Ripjaws V 2x16GB DDR4 3600
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 4070 12GB Dual
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB Gen4, Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB , 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD sata,
Display(s) ASUS TUF VG249Q3A 24" 1080p 165-180Hz VRR
Case DarkFlash DLM21 Mesh
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC1200 Audio/Nvidia HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Rog Strix Impact 3 Wireless | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech B314 Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,975 (0.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
PS5/XB2 is threatening to eclipse PC gaming. They will never hit PC level graphical power but the difference is reducing to the naked eye with each generation.
No, the consoles are more and more targeting the casual gamers, and the hardware is lagging further and further behind the PCs, so gaming enthusiasts are slowly leaving the platform. Nintendo have dropped all the way down to a tablet, and in a few years there will be TVs with better hardware built in. Back in the days consoles were actually competing with PC gaming.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,128 (6.58/day)
PS5/XB2 is threatening to eclipse PC gaming. They will never hit PC level graphical power but the difference is reducing to the naked eye with each generation.
Your comments will fall on deaf ears here. We don't care about consoles. Until consoles have the versatility and configurability of a PC, they will never have what it takes to compete.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,185 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
PS5/XB2 is threatening to eclipse PC gaming. They will never hit PC level graphical power but the difference is reducing to the naked eye with each generation.

Good point. There is no ray tracing in console tech as of now, another confirmation its not going to take off. All AMD needs to do is call out RTX for the cheap scam it really is, and profit.

PS5/XB2 is threatening to eclipse PC gaming. They will never hit PC level graphical power but the difference is reducing to the naked eye with each generation.

Good point. There is no ray tracing in console tech as of now, another confirmation its not going to take off. All AMD needs to do is call out RTX for the cheap scam it really is, and profit.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,128 (6.58/day)
Good point. There is no ray tracing in console tech as of now, another confirmation its not going to take off. All AMD needs to do is call out RTX for the cheap scam it really is, and profit.
It's not a cheap scam. It's step in the right direction, bringing hollywood quality visuals to gaming, something that needed to happen years ago.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,185 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
It's not a cheap scam. It's step in the right direction, bringing hollywood quality visuals to gaming, something that needed to happen years ago.

Sure thing. Good luck buying into it then, paying Pascal prices for Pascal performance once more. This wont fly, mark my words. Save this post and get back to it next year; or just look at the number of Physx games on GPU today; or the number of Hairworks games, or Turf Effects... or...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,128 (6.58/day)
Sure thing. Good luck buying into it then, paying Pascal prices for Pascal performance once more. This wont fly, mark my words. Save this post and get back to it next year; or just look at the number of Physx games on GPU today; or the number of Hairworks games, or Turf Effects... or...
There is a difference between Physx and ray-tracing. Physx was a platform for doing physics modeling in a game, something that can be done in software at similar performance hits. Ray-tracing is a graphics rendering technique that is well known and well used, but needs dedicated hardware to run more efficiently. NVidia has just given us all that hardware. It was only a matter of time until it was brought into the gaming sector. Smart devs are going to use it. Foolish and moronic devs will ignore it and adopt the attitude of ignorance.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,185 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
There is a difference between Physx and ray-tracing. Physx was a platform for doing physics modeling in a game, something that can be done in software at similar performance hits. Ray-tracing is a graphics rendering technique that is well known and well used, but needs dedicated hardware to run more efficiently. NVidia has just given us all that hardware. It was only a matter of time until it was brought into the gaming sector. Smart devs are going to use it. Foolish and moronic devs will ignore it and adopt the attitude of ignorance.

Wow, you should join Jensen on stage shouting TEN GIGA RAYS PER SECOND PEOPLE!

You mistake theory for practice. The current iteration isnt practical, and economically it wont work.

Do you seriously believe Nvidia didnt drop a huge bag of money at each of those devs? No sane mind optimizes a game for the top 5% and considers that good business. You can look at Crytek to see how those developers fare...
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,128 (6.58/day)
Wow, you should join Jensen on stage shouting TEN GIGA RAYS PER SECOND PEOPLE!

You mistake theory for practice. The current iteration isnt practical, and economically it wont work.

Do you seriously believe Nvidia didnt drop a huge bag of money at each of those devs? No sane mind optimizes a game for the top 5% and considers that good business. You can look at Crytek to see how those developers fare...
Do understand just how useful ray-tracing is? When every movie studio on the planet uses it for their CGI, it's big and has been for decades. And now's it's come to the consumer. If you fail to understand what ray-tracing has done for the world and it's potential for gaming, that is only your failure.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,948 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Do understand just how useful ray-tracing is? When every movie studio on the planet uses it for their CGI, it's big and has been for decades. And now's it's come to the consumer. If you fail to understand what ray-tracing has done for the world and it's potential for gaming, that is only your failure.


Its useful, sure, but not in the closed wall garden of GameWorks. Its useful when it will be implemented, which based on game consoles running AMD hardware with DX12/Vulcan technology for the next 3 years it will only see the light of day on a few select titles on PC and then half of it will be CPU based.

Nvidia have a habit of making something that is only fully featured on games that suck ass. Arkham anyone? PhysX https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_games_with_hardware-accelerated_PhysX_support

Lets claim its someting great when we actually have a good set of games using it and everyone can use it. Till then a few thousand people with hardware capable of something not implemented and that will likely demand more performance than the card is capable of producing in its first generation is worthless.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
796 (0.16/day)
Processor Intel
Motherboard MSI
Cooling Cooler Master
Memory Corsair
Video Card(s) Nvidia
Storage Western Digital/Kingston
Display(s) Samsung
Case Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic
Mouse Glorious
Keyboard UniKey
Software Windows 10 x64
Steve hit every nail on the head. Especially from 13:00 onward.
"For now Ray-Tracing looks to be more hype than anything, and nVidia are using this to hide the fact they don't actually have anything new to sell"

lol almost every new GPU generation introducing new technologies. RTX is not like Unified Shader Architecture so it won't took over rasterization overnight. Saying that RTX 2000 won't have any improvment in performance is silly.

Dumb people see less Cuda cores/TFLOPS = it must be slower. 780 Ti (2880c/5.1 tflops) vs 980 (2048c/4.6 tflops) who is faster?

Wow, you should join Jensen on stage shouting TEN GIGA RAYS PER SECOND PEOPLE!

You mistake theory for practice. The current iteration isnt practical, and economically it wont work.

Do you seriously believe Nvidia didnt drop a huge bag of money at each of those devs? No sane mind optimizes a game for the top 5% and considers that good business. You can look at Crytek to see how those developers fare...

Wolfenstein 2 Beta patch: Async Compute brings 5% extra performance for RX Vega 64
AMD finds 5% more performance with async
Async Compute Only Boosted HITMAN’s Performance By 5-10% on AMD cards
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,975 (0.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
There is no ray tracing in console tech as of now, another confirmation its not going to take off. All AMD needs to do is call out RTX for the cheap scam it really is, and profit.
Raytracing is not a scam. It will take a while before it's very useful, but all new technology has to be introduced some way, and this is only the beginning of the next revolution in graphics. Give it a few iterations, and you'll see it's useful.

Even with the limited usefulness of raytracing in the GeForce 20xx series, the cards will still be the most powerful GPUs we've seen by far. It's astounding how all the "wise guys" on Youtube manages to know the performance of this new generation, failing to realize the obvious that the SMs are completely redesigned. What we normally refer to as "cores" in GPUs are not cores at all, it's FPUs (usually FPU/ALU combos). Turing uses a different structure where FPUs and ALUs are separate clusters, allowing much higher throughput. We'll have to wait and see how much of a difference this makes for gaming. I honestly don't know if we will see a large difference across the board, or more of a boost in certain types of games. But I do know that Nvidia wouldn't switch to this unless it was significantly better.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.85/day)
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Grafi...ormance-in-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1263244/

looks like 2080ti is running tomb raider and drops to 30+ fps on heavy scenarios, still an early version of the game


Its also at 1080p. Game releases next month its on its final stages. Sep, 14

PCGamesHardware.De said:
We tried Shadow of the Tomb Raider with Raytracing on a Geforce RTX 2080 Ti and show in the video the pictures per second at Full HD and probably in the highest detail level.

$1200 card with RTX at 1080p 30-60fps
 
Joined
Jul 27, 2018
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
People here calling ray-tracing a scam.
After commenting they go back to watch the new Netflix movie filled with CGI they don't even know is CGI... because of ray-tracing. Ignorance never goes away, does it?

Comparing ray-tracing to hairworks is the new VR is 3D-TV.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.53/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 5600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 6700 10GB SWFT 309
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703 (TTC Gold 60M)
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (Gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
After commenting they go back to watch the new Netflix movie filled with CGI they don't even know is CGI... because of ray-tracing. Ignorance never goes away, does it?

That movie was made with probably half a million dollars in ray-tracing capable hardware. Not a single RTX 2080. Not in real time.
No one here is going to make CGI movies with a gaming card.
At this point in time ray-tracing is a gimmick. In two years it will be the best thing ever, now it's worthless for gaming.

This entire series was made as a stopgap until 7nm matures. Hype up people with RT, get them to buy Turing saying it's the best thing since sliced bread and cocaine, and then in mid 2019 come out with a new card, with everything improved, including ray-tracing capabilities. Get money from sheep twice in less than one year. Cupertino style.
This might be the one of the most pointless release in recent history along with Kaby Lake, hand full of Bulldozer iterations and 2000 series Radeon.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
2,975 (0.79/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K
Motherboard ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock
Memory Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24"
Case Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2
Audio Device(s) Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus
Power Supply Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard CM Storm QuickFire XT
Software Ubuntu
Raytracing is no more a "gimmick" than DirectX 12 was a "gimmick". We're still waiting for the good games to use it natively, yet many jumped on the hype train and bought cards that were supposed to be more "future proof". Most of those buyers have already or are about to replace their hardware anyway…
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,948 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
People here calling ray-tracing a scam.
After commenting they go back to watch the new Netflix movie filled with CGI they don't even know is CGI... because of ray-tracing. Ignorance never goes away, does it?

Comparing ray-tracing to hairworks is the new VR is 3D-TV.


https://www.cnet.com/news/vr-is-not-dying-insists-manufacturer-of-vr-headset/


https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/Steam-Hardware-Software-Survey-Welcome-to-Steam

https://www.roadtovr.com/valve-monthly-active-vr-users-on-steam-are-up-160-year-over-year/


.07% winning .. sure looks funny if it looks like that
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.85/day)
Raytracing is no more a "gimmick" than DirectX 12 was a "gimmick". We're still waiting for the good games to use it natively, yet many jumped on the hype train and bought cards that were supposed to be more "future proof". Most of those buyers have already or are about to replace their hardware anyway…

Shadows of the Tomb Raider confirmed RTX support would be a patch not native upon release. EA wont commit to saying anything about performance metrics.

Game needs DX12 support, On top of that needs DXR support. Then it has to be supported by Nvidia GameWorks RT SDK.

How many games include DX12 support? How many games run better on DX12 over DX11 on Nvidia hardware? How many games include GameWorks without Nvidia backing?
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,185 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse XTRFY M42
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Do understand just how useful ray-tracing is? When every movie studio on the planet uses it for their CGI, it's big and has been for decades. And now's it's come to the consumer. If you fail to understand what ray-tracing has done for the world and it's potential for gaming, that is only your failure.

Read again. Never said it wasnt useful, im saying this implementation is a failure
 
Top