Post your Final Fantasy XV Benchmark Results

[derp]

What is your 1080 Ti ? That memory clock is insane.

 

[Deleted member 178884]

@derp @T4C Fantasy
My result is invalid. I discovered my 7740x can't run my 1080 ti at x16 with a wireless card, going to remove it forever and retest.

 

[T4C Fantasy]

@derp @T4C Fantasy
My result is invalid. I discovered my 7740x can't run my 1080 ti at x16 with a wireless card, going to remove it forever and retest.

I will change it when you do

 

[Deleted member 178884]

I will change it when you do

Thanks - as you can see the "active figure" is x8 - I'll have to remove the wireless card later or tomorrow and take a rerun, weird how I never knew all this time.

 

[derp]

Thanks - as you can see the "active figure" is x8 - I'll have to remove the wireless card later or tomorrow and take a rerun, weird how I never knew all this time.

thats why i asked you if you all right, when noticed yr score with 1080ti same as mine at gtx1080

 

[korn87]

thats why i asked you if you all right, when noticed yr score with 1080ti same as mine at gtx1080

then six under 1080 turned up, I hope with the advent of cold to conquer 14,000.

 

[Deleted member 178884]

Removed the wireless card, saw the gpu STILL at x8 then found this on the "specifications"
@derp @T4C Fantasy
Great job msi for gimping the 7740x even more than intel did.

 

[derp]

Removed the wireless card, saw the gpu STILL at x8 then found this on the "specifications"
Great job msi for gimping the 7740x even more than intel did.

oh man, just replace yr 7700k to something more useful, like 7820x or 7900x

 

[Deleted member 178884]

oh man, just replace yr 7700k to something more useful, like 7820x or 7900x

Nah, I'll just grab another 1080 ti, then get a 7900x and then custom loop.
(That's a lotta money)

 

[Sasqui]

Great job msi for gimping the 7740x even more than intel did.

That's interesting. Devil is in the details

Edit: What's messed up is I see the exact same thing for my 4790k... but my motherboard doesn't gimp the one 16x slot to x8 (unless I suppose, there's another PCIe device attached). Did you try a different slot?

 

[Deleted member 178884]

That's interesting. Devil is in the details

View attachment 109416

Yeah it's sad, fortunately I paid £10 posted for the cpu after adding my £115 cex voucher to the mix - Still a shame.

Edit: What's messed up is I see the exact same thing for my 4790k... but my motherboard doesn't gimp the one 16x slot to x8 (unless I suppose, there's another PCIe device attached). Did you try a different slot?

I've tried different x16 slots, I have no other devices installed, looks like it's a 100% gimp by msi, and the x299 tuf mark 2 supports x16 yet the x299 gaming carbon by msi clearly states multiple times it does x8/x8 or x8 and that's all, no x16 support for a 16 lane cpu.

 

[Sasqui]

I've tried different x16 slots, I have no other devices installed, looks like it's a 100% gimp by msi, and the x299 tuf mark 2 supports x16 yet the x299 gaming carbon by msi clearly states multiple times it does x8/x8 or x8 and that's all, no x16 support for a 16 lane cpu.

That's hard to believe for a "cutting edge" board. What I don't understand is my 4790k spec sheet from intel seems to show only 1x16 lane PCIe bus, but my board supposedly supports 2x16 PCIe slots.

I'm getting wayyyy OT here, I"m going to start a new thread. Apologies to the OP.

 

[AnomalouS]

another round of tweaking on the 8700k / GIGABYTE RTX 2080 Ti WindForce OC w/ bios update... Don't feel like I have the best performing 8700k, delidded and taking massive voltage for 5200mhz... EVGA DDR4-3200 may be holding me back a little as well, atleast that is what I am seeing from my TimeSpy benches.

 

[fullinfusion]

Runs WAY better on Windows 7(as opposed to 10) for me. A run with the same settings on 10 doesn't even score 1/2 as high. Unless...you know how to fix the timer bug(requires a little dab of the secret sauce). But...that only worked with my 280X...for some stupid reason. Speaking of which, would you mind updating my score with that? Thanks! I appreciate it! Anyway, I messed around for days trying to get it to work with my Vega 64. Total waste of time. Shoulda gave up and tried 7 instead MUCH sooner.

View attachment 106325

Spoiler: How bad can it possibly be?

VERY BAD!!! NO JOKE!!!
View attachment 106326

I call this BUNK! either you don't know what your doing or your system took a shit.. My V56 mildly overclocked is pretty much in line with 10k

So your idea of W7 vs W10 is way off base mate

 

[Nuckles56]

Lets just say that if I want to play this game on my rig, I need a CPU upgrade, as a i5 6500 is a massive bottleneck on a 1080ti as it is almost 50% lower scoring than most of the 1080ti's on the board already. I also tested it with my brother's rig, which has a Ryzen 5 1500X @3.9 GHz and 2933MHz RAM and it scored 50% higher than my 6500 (neither run used any GPU overclocking beyond what precision boost 3.0 would do which is about 2060MHz )

 

[johnspack]

Have to update... even if it only brings me up one score. I have 2 weird modded bioses on this card, still figuring out how to max them out. Bumped up my volts and power a bit and I got a bit higher boost... I am running quality texture mode for this....

 

[T4C Fantasy]

another round of tweaking on the 8700k / GIGABYTE RTX 2080 Ti WindForce OC w/ bios update... Don't feel like I have the best performing 8700k, delidded and taking massive voltage for 5200mhz... EVGA DDR4-3200 may be holding me back a little as well, atleast that is what I am seeing from my TimeSpy benches.
View attachment 109431

needs to be fullscreen

Lets just say that if I want to play this game on my rig, I need a CPU upgrade, as a i5 6500 is a massive bottleneck on a 1080ti as it is almost 50% lower scoring than most of the 1080ti's on the board already. I also tested it with my brother's rig, which has a Ryzen 5 1500X @3.9 GHz and 2933MHz RAM and it scored 50% higher than my 6500 (neither run used any GPU overclocking beyond what precision boost 3.0 would do which is about 2060MHz )

View attachment 109442

full screen please

 

[AnomalouS]

needs to be fullscreen

My bad.... back to the drawing board, I'll see what I can do next week sometime.

 

[Nuckles56]

My bad @T4C Fantasy, here's a run with full screen

 

[johnspack]

Sorry, crawling my way up... quality texture settings again... just more boost:

 

[FreedomEclipse]

Is there anyone with an X79/3930k@4.5 or 4.6GHz or similar Xeon setup with a 1080Ti kind enough to humor me and run this bench?

Id like to know how my 3930k would of bottlenecked an 1080Ti

 

[Nuckles56]

Is there anyone with an X79/3930k@4.5 or 4.6GHz or similar Xeon setup with a 1080Ti kind enough to humor me and run this bench?

Id like to know how my 3930k would of bottlenecked an 1080Ti

Not as bad as my i5 6500

 

[FreedomEclipse]

Not as bad as my i5 6500

Sorry, your post just made me oddly curious

Its more a sense of nostalgia as my X79 setup no longer exists but id like to know that if I was still running it then it would of done me proud with my recent 1080Ti purchase.

 

[Nuckles56]

Well I think we can say it would have done quite alright , just have a look at Tomgang's score and that's a few generations older than your CPU

 

[GamerGuy]

I tried the benchmark for fun, one at Standard Quality setting, the other High Quality setting. At the former setting, I have a CPU bottleneck but benching it at High eliminated some of that.....I think, may still be bottlenecked though.

And below is at High Quality setting...

Whatever the case, I think if I were to run the game at 3440x1440, at highest possible setting, my i7 3960X @ 4.1ghz shoiuld do fine since my GPU would be thoroughly stressed,