Autumn Equinox AIDA64 Cache and Memory Benchmark Competition

[Woomack]

These 3 for now.

TR 1920X / ASRock X399M Taichi / DDR4-3726 CL14-14-14-32 1N (4x Samsung / quad channel)

8086K / ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming ITX/ac / DDR4-4500 CL17-17-17-37 2N (2x Samsung / dual channel)

i9-7900X / ASRock X299 Professional XE / DDR4-3800 CL20-23-23-45 2N ( 8x Micron / quad channel)

 

[infrared]

I guess I'm at the point of diminishing returns here on this first gen Ryzen..

Benchmark settings:

Daily settings:

I'll compare to a 3700X when I get one Not sure if it'll let me go further on the RAM on this C6H, hopefully it will.

 

[agent_x007]

Slowest rig with second best extreme CPU for the platform (not sure how "slowest rig" works, but I still can try right ?)

It's interesting how my RAM wtih 4960X is faster than L1 cache in this test
Also, NVMe RAID0 can get in the around the same bandwidth as RAM of this platform
^That, is what I call progress.

 

[JorgeRod]

 

[storm-chaser]

Thanks for the submissions guys! Leaderboards will be updated this afternoon!

 

[PolRoger]

These two runs were recently post here on the TPU Forum in other threads...

Dual channel DDR4-3866C16 for latency score:

Quad channel DDR3-2333C7 for bandwidth:

 

[storm-chaser]

PS. How does slowest rig work ?

Slowest rig is simply that, lowest clock speed and lowest memory speed is what we are looking for. Vintage machine will likely win out here.

 

[delshay]

Slowest rig is simply that, lowest clock speed and lowest memory speed is what we are looking for. Vintage machine will likely win out here.

I take it your not allowed to underclock. If you want to be slow just add some really rubbish memory with poor timing.. ie don't fit PC-3200, find some old 100MHz DDR.

EDIT: Run single channel with very low memory 128MB or lower so that windows comes to a crawl & don't forget to add a very old slow hard drive from the 70's or better still use a tape drive.

Same applies to standard SDRAM & 72 pin simms (80ns or worse).

Your not cheating because your running at standard specification, "no underclocking" including memory

 

[agent_x007]

I know what you mean :

 

[Final_Fighter]

i wounder how high i can get the latency on a ryzen? is there a category for slowest mem latency?

 

[Regeneration]

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark is a bit flawed since the RAM bandwidth test runs on a single core.

You'll get better results with C-states on and/or Turbo boost on. Something like 10 percent.

Perhaps @W1zzard can make a few adjustments to MemTest64 and release it as MemBench64

 

[storm-chaser]

i wounder how high i can get the latency on a ryzen? is there a category for slowest mem latency?

Sure we can add that category... have a little patience here as I'm busy with a few things from work for the next couple hours, but yeah we will get something going for sure... for slowest memory latency I'm going to sub my T61p but Agent_x007 still has me beat... for now

 

[Final_Fighter]

It will be interesting to see because im sure the oldest system will win but exactly how old can you go back and still run aida64 i dont know. we need to get the Nostalgic Hardware club involved.

 

[storm-chaser]

It will be interesting to see because im sure the oldest system will win but exactly how old can you go back and still run aida64 i dont know. we need to get the Nostalgic Hardware club involved.

I'm thinking something like this might give the nostalgic guys a run for their money...

But... is it real?

 

[er557]

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark is a bit flawed since the RAM bandwidth test runs on a single core.

You'll get better results with C-states on and/or Turbo boost on. Something like 10 percent.

Perhaps @W1zzard can make a few adjustments to MemTest64 and release it as MemBench64

Maybe so, but the additional memory read benchmark and for example the ray tracing fp64 benchmarks in aida64 don't seem to be running on one core, and represent real world performance

 

[storm-chaser]

yup, that was an easy one...

Question is, do you have a response for Woomack's powerhouse submission? You are only a few thousand megabytes R/W/C away!

 

[er557]

I can live with that, being that my cpu scores are about four times than that rig....
I hope once I get my corsair rgb 128gb kit the latencies shall improve a bit...

 

[storm-chaser]

Lenovo T61p with x9000 Core 2 Extreme CPU (stock speed, undervolted)

*Leaderboards Updated*

 

[freeagent]

Nothing too crazy, but still snappy.

 

[PolRoger]

@storm-chaser: You missed my post #31 submissions...



Triple channel update using GSkill kit with Elpida BBSE ic.

DDR3-2175C8:

DDR3-2275C9:

***Edit***
Slow rig submissions...

Socket 370 Celeron 466Mhz (Mendocino) single channel PC100:

Socket 370 Pentium III 933MHz (Coppermine) single channel PC133:

 

[Woomack]

Little update on TR4 rig:

TR 1920X / ASRock X399M Taichi / DDR4-3726 CL14-14-14-28 1N (4x Samsung / quad channel)

This one was on Micron SODIMM some time ago.

 

[PolRoger]

Red Lantern (slow rig) AMD...

Athlon XP 2500+ Barton, Socket A (unlocked) DDR333 single channel:

 

[DR4G00N]

Figured I'd give it a shot on my Slot 1 system, had to use a 66MHz FSB cpu of course to get the slowest mem speed. Almost 1/3 sec of latency. (edit: Wait, that's not quite right.)
Tried to activate it but it didn't want to work even with my legit Aida key.

PII 300MHz 4.5x66MHz
128MB PC133 3-3-3 @ PC66 3-3-3
Abit BH6 V1.01

 

[MrGenius]

Single Channel DDR200 SDRAM (3-4-4-6 CR2)

 

[johnspack]

Here's old Sandy Bridge xeon trying... I must try to oc this ram at some point....