Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores Part 2

[Enterprise24]

i7-8700K @ 5.3GHz + GTX 1080 Ti @ 2177/1586 = 4441

 

[mouacyk]

Congrats for eking past. My GPU does not like 2177... what temperatures are you getting?

 

[MrGenius]

I'm expanding these threads(Valley too) to include 1440p scores.

1st up...ME!

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz + RX Vega 64 @ 1653/1190 = 1635

A little 1680x1050 action as well.

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz + RX Vega 64 @ 1654/1190 = 2820

 

[trog100]

i still cant get the fullscreen screenshot to work.. it has worked in the past but wont now for reasons unknown to me.. it just minimizes and give me a black screen.. he he..

trog

 

[ArbitraryAffection]

Hihi.

I ran the test at 1440p. My GPU clocks are 1520 MHz (in this bench) and HBM at 880 MHz. It's an RX Vega 56, and this is my 'optimised' setting for daily gaming. I can get the GPU to run higher frequencies but I really don't feel the need to push higher scores.

I'm using VSR to do 1440p because my monitor is only 1080p.

I also did the run at 1080p:

Same clock speeds.

 

[trog100]

heaven at 1440.. camera pic cos i still cant get a fullscreen save to work..

cpu 8700K at 4.9g 2080ti at 1489 core 1937 memory..

trog

 

[Enterprise24]

Congrats for eking past. My GPU does not like 2177... what temperatures are you getting?

Thanks. 38C full load with 28C ambient temp.

 

[infrared]

My 1440P result

R7-1800X | 4.2GHz | GTX 1080 Ti | 2101/1552 | 2616 | infrared

View attachment 111094

From the Valley thread dunno how I didn't notice!

 

[trog100]

heaven at 1440 cpu 8700K at 4.9g.. 2080ti at 1489 core 1937 memory..

trog

 

[fakeen]

Xeon e3-1240
Sapphire Pulse itx rx 570 core 1400 mem 1750

 

[agent_x007]

E5-1680 v2 @ 4.3GHz + GTX 580 3GB @ 772/1002 (stock) = 1080p : 695 + 1440p : 427

 

[Vayra86]

i still cant get the fullscreen screenshot to work.. it has worked in the past but wont now for reasons unknown to me.. it just minimizes and give me a black screen.. he he..

trog

Use RTSS instead, and set it up generically for every game. Saves a lot of hassle Fixed key, fixed destination folder.

 

[ArbitraryAffection]

I just got given a Vega 64 Red Devil by a friend, so I flashed my Vega 56 Pulse to the 64 NITRO+ BIOS (it works, I did it before) and now I have two Vega 64's in crossfire... except one has 56 CU not 64 XD

Anyway when I have time later I will do a Heaven run and see how well they scale. ^_^

 

[maxtherox]

MY R7 370 2 GB with overclock
base clock > 985MHz| overclocked > 1135 MHz
Memory base clock > 1425 | overclocked > 1515
CPU > I5 4460 3.2 GHz
16 GB RAM

 

[Malik Sajid]

The first RX 570 is here..
i7-950 @ 3.0GHz + Rx 570 8Gb @ 1540/2250 = 1436

 

[MrGenius]

One more with the 3570K + RX Vega 64...because I can.

i5-3570K @ 5.0GHz + RX Vega 64 @ 1647/1190 = 2467

 

[Fizban]

I decided to give it a go on my laptop.

That's with a 200 mhz overclock on the GPU. It got as high as 1890 mhz during the benchmark, cpu is not overclocked.

 

[Enterprise24]

1440p result.
i7-8700K @ 5GHz + GTX 1080 Ti @ 2190/1586 = 2759

 

[MrGenius]

i7-3770K @ 5.3GHz + RX Vega 64 @ 1653/1190

i7-3770K @ 5.3GHz + RX Vega 64 @ 1654/1190

 

[Malik Sajid]

[Update] i7-950 @ 4.0GHz + RX 570 @ 1540/2250 = 1459

I've noticed that Trixx allows to add +200mv unlike Msi AB which only allows +100mv, so would it be safe to go to 1.3v to bench @1600mhz not for daily use ofc? and is there anyway to make AB able to push those 200mv like trixx?

 

[johnspack]

Kept modding my bios, now up to 1513/3900 stable. e5-1650 still at 4.7

 

[MrGenius]

I've noticed that Trixx allows to add +200mv unlike Msi AB which only allows +100mv, so would it be safe to go to 1.3v to bench @1600mhz not for daily use ofc?

I would. I don't know how "safe" it is. But it wouldn't bother me none. So long as temps don't get too crazy...

...and is there anyway to make AB able to push those 200mv like trixx?

There is. But it's a bit convoluted(especially with a non-MSI card). To the point that if it really does work with Trixx...I'd just use that instead. Much easier. You could also mod the BIOS. But that's probably just as much, if not more, of a hassle.

EDIT: If voltage control is working with AB, it's probably got an I2C bus voltage controller. Which would mean you could probably get OverdriveNTool to do +200mV too(right click the header bar, left click Settings, check the Enable I2C box and restart). And/or do a SoftPowerPlay mod. Then you could even use WattMan.

 

[Malik Sajid]

I would. I don't know how "safe" it is. But it wouldn't bother me none. So long as temps don't get too crazy...
There is. But it's a bit convoluted(especially with a non-MSI card). To the point that if it really does work with Trixx...I'd just use that instead. Much easier. You could also mod the BIOS. But that's probably just as much, if not more, of a hassle.

EDIT: If voltage control is working with AB, it's probably got an I2C bus voltage controller. Which would mean you could probably get OverdriveNTool to do +200mV too(right click the header bar, left click Settings, check the Enable I2C box and restart). And/or do a SoftPowerPlay mod. Then you could even use WattMan.

After restarting Overdrive says that's I2C isn't available, My problem with trixx is that I've already tried to do +200mv with it but it doesn't seem to be accurate like AB, it was doing some random scary voltage spikes and bypassing 1.3v to 1.35v I was afraid at this point so I cancelled the process immediately.

 

[MrGenius]

@Malik Sajid We did this whole deal with the AB voltage control before you and I. I'd forgotten who it was that I discussed in thorough detail with. Turns out...IT WAS YOU!

So here's that...again.

Doing a little digging around it looks like it probably has the same NCP81022 voltage controller as the other Sapphire RX 500 series cards(Pulse and Nitro+). Which is on the AMD SVI2 bus(and wouldn't be I2C?). So I wouldn't have a clue what to do with that.

SVI2 Interface

The NCP81022 is design to accept commands over AMD’s SVI2 bus. The communication is accomplished using three lines, a data line SVD, a clock line SVC and a telemetry line SVT. The SVD line can be used not only to set the voltage level of the Main rail and North bridge rail, but can also set the load line slope, programmed offset and also the PSI (power state indicator bits). The SVT line from the NCP81022 communicates voltage, current and status updates back to the processor

https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data Sheets/ON Semiconductor PDFs/NCP81022.pdf

I dunno. That's pretty much all I've got. You're on your own from here kid. Good luck!

 

[Malik Sajid]

@Malik Sajid We did this whole deal with the AB voltage control before you and I. I'd forgotten who it was that I discussed in thorough detail with. Turns out...IT WAS YOU!

So here's that...again.

Doing a little digging around it looks like it probably has the same NCP81022 voltage controller as the other Sapphire RX 500 series cards(Pulse and Nitro+). Which is on the AMD SVI2 bus(and wouldn't be I2C?). So I wouldn't have a clue what to do with that.

https://media.digikey.com/pdf/Data Sheets/ON Semiconductor PDFs/NCP81022.pdf

I dunno. That's pretty much all I've got. You're on your own from here kid. Good luck!

Yeah It was me, What a thread! Actually I checked it out yesterday but I've really got so confused then I thought it's supposed to be a lot easier in this situation since trixx is alread able to do +200mv but I think I'm wrong about that and I guess we got nothing to do with the I2C approach since the voltage controller is using another bus, right?

Ok, I'll give trixx a shot and try to hold my nerve while seeing these +1.3 voltages during 26 loops.