- Joined
- Oct 13, 2016
- Messages
- 165 (0.06/day)
- Location
- Nea Makri, Greece.
System Name | Dark Sith Lord / Fat Boy |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen7 2700X / AMD FX 8350 |
Motherboard | Asus Rog Strix B450-F Gaming / Gigabyte 990XA UD3 R5 |
Cooling | Coolermaster Hyper 212 Turbo LED (2x120mm in push-pull) / Coolermaster HyperX (2x120mm in push-pull) |
Memory | 2x8gb G.Skill TridentZ RGB DDR4 3200MHz / 4x4gb Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866MHz |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6gb / Gainward GTX 950 2gb |
Storage | Crucial P1 NVMe 1tb, 2x Barracuda 2TB, 1x IronWolf NAS 2TB / Samsung 840 Evo 500gb + Samsung F1 1tb |
Display(s) | BenQ GL2450 24'' / Samsung Syncmaster 20'' 2043nw |
Case | CM HAF 932 (CM 200mm [Red Led] front & side intake, Shark Evil Black 140mm exhaust) / NZXT Trinity |
Audio Device(s) | Realtek ALC1220 on Creative Inspire S2 2.1 / Realtek 889 on Creative SBS Vivid 60 2.0 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova B2 750w / Thermaltake Toughpower 700w |
Mouse | Steelseries Rival 110 / Sharkoon Light² 100 |
Keyboard | Bloody B975 (LK brown optical switches) / Philips SPK84 (blue switches) with silicone o'rings mod |
Software | Win10 Pro x64 / Win7 Ultimate x64 |
Stop with this nonsense. 32-bit CPUs/OS' have NOTHING to do with memory capacity.
A 32bit cpu cannot address in 64 bit memory space. And you need 64bit addressing in order to have access in more than 4gigabytes of memory.
There is NO way the memory above 4g to be addressable from a 32bit cpu, not even with virtual memory paging. At least not from an x86 cpu.
Two options that I know of:
- Disable one memory controller and use 128-bit, possibly compensate with faster memory.
- Use an imbalanced memory configuration, like GTX 660/660 Ti.
There is NO way to cover the deficit of one third of cutting the memory bus, with higher clocks, because the GDDR5 memory has limitations on the speeds it can achieve. Thats why i think they are using GDDR6 also for the same model. Because IT MATTERS for this generation, even for middle range. Propably the GDDR6 model will be much faster and maybe with slightly different core config. I guess nvidia knows the GDDR5 is not enough as the core needs its memory to be, but they dont give a damn. Milking the cow is the way for them. You will need 30-35% increase in memory speed to cover the deficit.
It so funny seeing you guys trying to defend something that sucks so hard. Really, some people here should consider a new carreer in comedy (that was a joke).
Last edited: