• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD's Initial Production Run of Radeon VII Just 5,000 Pieces, Company Denies it

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,166 (7.56/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
More news coming in on AMD's upcoming high-end graphics card, the Radeon VII, with Chinese media reporting that AMD's initial production run for the card is set to ship just 5,000 pieces worldwide. This comes hot on the heels of another report that the Radeon VII won't come in custom-designs by AMD's add-in board (AIB) partners, and that only the reference design will be repackaged and sold by them. What's worse, the source which leaked this production size also revealed that AMD is selling the card below cost-price, i.e., with each card sold, AMD is losing money. This probably explains Wall Street's cold response to the Radeon VII launch, but with a batch size of just 5,000 (roughly $3.5 million in sales at $699 a piece), this card has a negligible impact on AMD's bottom-line.

AMD posted a swift denial to both pieces of news, the size of its production run and the product's profitability. In a statement to MyDrivers, AMD said (translated): "We will not release production figures, but when released on February 7, AMD.com official website and AIB vendor partners will have products on sale, and we expect the supply of Radeon VII to meet the needs of gamers." In short, Radeon VII is shaping up to be the card you'd want to buy if you've sworn a blood-oath never to buy an NVIDIA product, and you need something to play games in 2019 at 4K with.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
64 (0.01/day)
Location
U.A.E Dubai
Processor I9 13900k
Motherboard Asus z690 hero
Cooling Next Kraken X72
Memory 32GB gskill 6000
Video Card(s) xfx 7900xtx black
Storage Intel P5800X 800GB / sabrent rocket 4 plus 4tb
Display(s) Asus PA32DC
Case ASUS TUF GT502
Audio Device(s) Sony TA-ZH1ES & Sony Z1R
Power Supply Corsair 1500i
Selling at lost. Long live hbm2
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,699 (0.55/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
No way any GPU sold at over $500 is causing any money loss, apart for an ultra big die, which surely isn't the case here. If Vega 56 was sold at $400-450 back at the time of its launch and before the crypto craziness bulit up, this one which is also a cut version of the full Vega 20, will be surely profitable. And I think that AMD has put the price up there in order to be able to lower it IF nVidia lowers tha 2080's price. I am positive that they can sell it even at $600 at profit. 16GB HBM2 can cost up to $200 max (probaly closer to $150) and the die is relatively small at 330mm2. A small batch at first (not only 5000 units though) might exist just to not be found with a big stock in their hands in 1-2 months if the gaming community isn't fond of it after the reviews. They need to be precautious after all as the small player in this market, especially for an expensive product.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
3,595 (1.18/day)
Fairly common practice - product released for shareholders, not clients. Yes, we can deliver 7nm GPUs. Sit tight and wait till we make it profitable (well... until TSMC does that).

Also, AMD will be able to use a "first consumer 7nm GPU" headline.
Looking at all the R&D and manufacturing struggle, 7nm could be the last silicon node for mainstream GPUs ever.

No way any GPU sold at over $500 is causing any money loss
And this statement is based on what...? :)

AMD marketing strategy lately is all about being first to 7nm in CPUs and GPUs (after they took the lead in core count). Having such a limited, flagship product makes a lot of sense for AMD, so TSMC could have asked any price they wanted.

Even if this whole move costs them $3.5mln (as much as the revenue), it's still less than 30s commercial during superbowl.
 
Low quality post by Gasaraki
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
669 (0.23/day)
System Name Unimatrix
Processor Intel i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard ASRock x390 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ RGB DDR4 @ 3400MHz 14-14-14-32
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 with Heatkiller Water Block
Storage 2x Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 SSD in RAID 0, 1x WD Blue 1TB M.2 SSD
Display(s) Alienware 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case CoolerMaster P500M Mesh
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
Keyboard Corsair K75
Benchmark Scores Really Really High
No way any GPU sold at over $500 is causing any money loss, apart for an ultra big die, which surely isn't the case here. If Vega 56 was sold at $400-450 back at the time of its launch and before the crypto craziness bulit up, this one which is also a cut version of the full Vega 20, will be surely profitable. And I think that AMD has put the price up there in order to be able to lower it IF nVidia lowers tha 2080's price. I am positive that they can sell it even at $600 at profit. 16GB HBM2 can cost up to $200 max (probaly closer to $150) and the die is relatively small at 330mm2. A small batch at first (not only 5000 units though) might exist just to not be found with a big stock in their hands in 1-2 months if the gaming community isn't fond of it after the reviews. They need to be precautious after all as the small player in this market, especially for an expensive product.


Dude. Don't say stuff you are not 100% sure about. It costs around $750 to make the Radeon7/Vega 20/Instinct card.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,259 (4.48/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2021
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (65w eco profile)
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Mugen (rev 5)
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-3200 32 GiB
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Storage Samsung 980 Pro, Seagate Exos X20 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay + USB 3.2 (A+C) 3.5" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse Nixeus REVEL-X
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
There is absolutely no way Radeon VII is priced below cost. They wouldn't bring it to market if that were the case (would have kept selling them as MI50).

I get the distinct impression from the OP that there's a smear campaign in the works. All of these things said target lowering AMD's stock valuation.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,292 (6.02/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
3,984 (1.13/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
Dude. Don't say stuff you are not 100% sure about. It costs around $750 to make the Radeon7/Vega 20/Instinct card.

How do you know it costs $750 to make with 100% certainty?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.44/day)
Location
So. Cal.
Chinese media = Nvidia dis-information.

How many Radeon MI60 Instinct Professional units would we think AMD produce/sells? How many chips on a 7nm wafer? How many on a wafer are just bad can't be salvage for anything? Then what's the mix of full MI60 (4096SP), MI50/Vega7 (3840SP), and I might say there possibly could be a 56CU/3584SP part being binned. That could point to how many parts AMD would have to play with.

As to price the existing Vega 64 has been down to $400... what's different? The 7nm wafer TSMC is charging more, although you get more per wafer, also remember the V64 was a full chip. This is a gelding so per chip could be slightly more, but I could say similar? Cost for 8Gb "more" HBM2, I might say $80. The interposer and assembly is same if not getting better so that's similar. There is plenty of money left in the BOM to provide profit, that's bunk!

Lastly, AIB's... We don't think existing Vega 64 design don't easily "port-over"? Everything is on the interposer, so the power section might need nothing as isn't the MI50 300 TDP while I thought Vega 7 isn't suppose to be that high. AIB's have existing PCB and coolers that should not have an issue flipping from their existing Vega 64 customs to this interposer that in all probability a "pin-for-pin" drop-in interposer and nothing more.

Logically this Chinese media report is not based on factual consideration.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
287 (0.06/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus Prime X570 Pro
Cooling Deepcool LS-720
Memory 32 GB (4x 8GB) DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon RX 7900 XTX Red Devil
Storage Samsung PM9A1 (980 Pro OEM) + 960 Evo NVMe SSD + 830 SATA SSD + Toshiba & WD HDD's
Display(s) Samsung C32HG70
Case Lian Li O11D Evo
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster Zx
Power Supply Seasonic 750W Focus+ Platinum
Mouse Logitech G703 Lightspeed
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex Pro
Software Windows 11 Pro
In short, Radeon VII is shaping up to be the card you'd want to buy if you've sworn a blood-oath never to buy an NVIDIA product, and you need something to play games in 2019 at 4K with.
Seriously @btarunr ? How biased can you be? You're actually blatantly saying on TPU frontpage that only reason anyone would buy Radeon VII is some oath never to buy NVIDIA?
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
225 (0.05/day)
Seriously @btarunr ? How biased can you be? You're actually blatantly saying on TPU frontpage that only reason anyone would buy Radeon VII is some oath never to buy NVIDIA?

Even if his quote is brutal an non-professional, I don't think he's wrong. I defended AMD all these years for what they were for : good performance/$ with enough performance to play.

But let's face it, the Radeon VII is nothing more that an attempt to fill the high-end user case.
And for that, there's the 2060, and nobody can deny it's performance on actual games. Three weeks ago I thought this card (2060) would be a very slow version of RTX cards, but it's not the case and I revised my point of view.

Slight problem is Win 10 with Fall update... Quite hard to in.
 
Joined
Oct 6, 2009
Messages
2,825 (0.51/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name My Gaming System
Processor Intel i7 4770k @ 4.4 Ghz
Motherboard Asus Maximus VI Impact (ITX)
Cooling Custom Full System Water cooling Loop
Memory G.Skill 1866 Mhz Sniper 8 Gb
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780 ti SC
Storage Samsung SSD EVO 120GB - Samsung SSD EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS W246H - 24" - widescreen TFT active matrix LCD
Case Bitfenix Prodigy
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Home Primeum
Seriously @btarunr ? How biased can you be? You're actually blatantly saying on TPU frontpage that only reason anyone would buy Radeon VII is some oath never to buy NVIDIA?

I really don't see how this is a blast on AMD or NVidia. Just saying. Someone's a little easily offended. It's just a video card.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2018
Messages
127 (0.06/day)
The truth is AMD hasn't developed high end GPU for gamers, period. They have some Instinct MI50 GPUs with a defective compute unit or two and decided to push them to AMD gaming fan boys for free advertising purposes. R7 will sadly be collectors edition GPU and nothing more.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.94/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
I wonder which TPU member will be the first to unbox and bench one of these, well minus W1zzard of course.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
2,699 (0.68/day)
Location
Alabama
Processor Ryzen 2600
Motherboard X470 Tachi Ultimate
Cooling AM3+ Wraith CPU cooler
Memory C.R.S.
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Software Linux Peppermint 10
Benchmark Scores Never high enough
Seriously @btarunr ? How biased can you be? You're actually blatantly saying on TPU frontpage that only reason anyone would buy Radeon VII is some oath never to buy NVIDIA?

I'm not so sure it's actual bias, more like a certain unfortunate truth stated and yes you do have folks like that out there - Same with AMD vs Intel, we've seen more than enough biased comments here and elsewhere to prove the truth of that statement.

No real bias here, I have both brands onhand for my use and just grabbed a GTX 780 for my DD, not the newest by any means but enough it serves the needs I have. Also have a R9 380X I run sometimes, it's a good card too so in truth either one can and will do for me. Only difference is what would run what I'm currently wanting to do best and that's it.

Same with AMD vs Intel, currently running a 7350K in this setup and before that it was a FX-8300, what I have runs along the fence and honestly I haven't seen enough difference to make me want to prefer one over the other, be it a card or CPU.

If it works and does the job to make you happy, go for it.
I do.
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
7,492 (1.47/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 9 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling 2x 360 + 280 rads. 3x Gentle Typhoons, 3x Phanteks T30, 2x TT T140 . EK-Quantum Momentum Monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB F4-4133C19D-16GTZR 14-16-12-30-44
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 7900XTX. Water block. Crossflashed.
Storage Optane 900P[Fedora] + WD BLACK SN850X 4TB + 750 EVO 500GB + 1TB 980PRO+SN560 1TB(W11)
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic EVO
Audio Device(s) SMSL RAW-MDA1 DAC
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software FEDORA 41
The main question is. Can you even order pancackes at TSMC at such amount. Considering how complex it is to set it up?

I call this bollox.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.44/day)
Location
So. Cal.
Knowing Apple's lackluster iPhone/iPad sales numbers, I wonder if TSMC could have some 7nm Wafer capacity that underutilized?

While "The data center accelerator market is expected to grow from 2.84 billion by 2018 to USD 21.19 billion by 2023"
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-rel...l-computing-in-ai-data-centers-300705003.html


Some would want to think AMD could do perhaps 500,000 GPUs to Data Center and Deep Learning HPC over the next 2-3 years I personally think that's low-ball.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4103435-china-catalyst-amds-radeon-instinct-ai-processors
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.22/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Chinese media = Nvidia dis-information.

How many Radeon MI60 Instinct Professional units would we think AMD produce/sells? How many chips on a 7nm wafer? How many on a wafer are just bad can't be salvage for anything? Then what's the mix of full MI60 (4096SP), MI50/Vega7 (3840SP), and I might say there possibly could be a 56CU/3584SP part being binned. That could point to how many parts AMD would have to play with.

As to price the existing Vega 64 has been down to $400... what's different? The 7nm wafer TSMC is charging more, although you get more per wafer, also remember the V64 was a full chip. This is a gelding so per chip could be slightly more, but I could say similar? Cost for 8Gb "more" HBM2, I might say $80. The interposer and assembly is same if not getting better so that's similar. There is plenty of money left in the BOM to provide profit, that's bunk!

Lastly, AIB's... We don't think existing Vega 64 design don't easily "port-over"? Everything is on the interposer, so the power section might need nothing as isn't the MI50 300 TDP while I thought Vega 7 isn't suppose to be that high. AIB's have existing PCB and coolers that should not have an issue flipping from their existing Vega 64 customs to this interposer that in all probability a "pin-for-pin" drop-in interposer and nothing more.

Logically this Chinese media report is not based on factual consideration.

Agreed , Hype and drama for what.
Seriously @btarunr ? How biased can you be? You're actually blatantly saying on TPU frontpage that only reason anyone would buy Radeon VII is some oath never to buy NVIDIA?

A bit like the one before with its salty BS, hype drama and certainly ,I remember TPU's covergage of Nvidias Founders edition announcment with no such saltiness for what was the same thing, hype drama, no need their will be enough drama and hype on TPU Radeon 7 review day, Also if this were about Nvidia the site might find itself without review samples like some neg V bloggers did recently with its predetermined attitude.


ALSO WORTH NOTING A LOT ON HERE WERE VERY HAPPY WITH 10% improvement for years even lauding its greatness ,vega 7 is 25%+ better then vega64 i have one , it games at 1680Mhz for no more then 240 watts but typically around 180 watts @4k,, Vega 7 runs Upto 300 watts , i very much doubt it runs that high in any game and its priced about the typical 2080 price point here in the uk with 2080's going for between 650 and 800 dependant on variant, of which there are two , one a bit shitter then the other in silicon terms, that alone gets AMD the sale for me , they are not being deceptive, but im not buying tbh waterblocked cards need using for longer to recoup costs, shame.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
1,064 (0.17/day)
Location
Montreal
System Name Aryzen / Sairikiki / Tesseract
Processor 5800x / i7 920@3.73 / 5800x
Motherboard Steel Legend B450M / GB EX58-UDP4 / Steel Legend B550M
Cooling Mugen 5 / Pure Rock / Glacier One 240
Memory Corsair Something 16 / Corsair Something 12 / G.Skill 32
Video Card(s) AMD 6800XT / AMD 6750XT / Sapphire 7800XT
Storage Way too many drives...
Display(s) LG 332GP850-B / Sony w800b / Sony X90J
Case EVOLV X / Carbide 540 / Carbide 280x
Audio Device(s) SB ZxR + GSP 500 / board / Denon X1700h + ELAC Uni-Fi 2 + Senn 6XX
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME GX-750 / Corsair HX750 / Seasonic Focus PX-650
Mouse G700 / none / G602
Keyboard G910
Software w11 64
Benchmark Scores I don't play benchmarks...
btarunr said:
AMD's Initial Production Run of Radeon VII Just 5,000 Pieces, Company Denies it

Do we no longer care how language works?
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,389 (3.29/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
The main question is. Can you even order pancackes at TSMC at such amount. Considering how complex it is to set it up?

I call this bollox.

AMD gets wafers with Vega 20s on them in X quantities, TSMC doesn't care nor do they have any control over what happens with them after that. These 5000 units or whatever wont change anything with regards to how much TSMC charges AMD.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2011
Messages
2,198 (0.44/day)
Location
So. Cal.
I suppose the 5000 unit allocation has some merit. As that would mean AMD figures initially gifting 1% of production (if looking at the 500,000 above) as Vega 7 at $700, instead of the $5000 they can probably get as a Instinct MI50. I suppose if FP64 was some "flaw" that they use to "bin" a Vega 7 but doubt that and why only 1% initially. For Vega 7 it's probably more about meeting power envelope, and less on shader count. So does that mean their 7nm production has little to no terrible chips once actual yield of unusable/bad parts are weeded out?


Agreed , Hype and drama for what
Jensen Huang cronies still looking to bad mouth.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,601 (6.53/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
Dude. Don't say stuff you are not 100% sure about. It costs around $750 to make the Radeon7/Vega 20/Instinct card.
That $750 number is made up as well. So.....
 
Top