@cucker tarlson I used the link that
@EarthDog provided in post #267 and disabled the patches and reran the test.
@EarthDog I took a quick look at the "Defrag" option, but said the drives were 0% fragmented, so as I suspected you don't need to defrag a SSD. I did however run the optimization and it went through a series of "passes" and while I did not see anything it obviously was doing something.
Anyway back to the original question, attached below was the scan with the patches turned off... some improvement from the original posted, but not as good as the original.
The one from a couple days ago.
Any insights would be appreciated. Also is what I am looking at really that big of a difference? To me it is just some numbers and obviously 575 is "lower" than 866, but what does that really mean? I am not a gamer or anything, but notice that the performance difference when I am having multiple screens open and the database processing does not seem to be the same as it used to be.
When I first got the machine I would open up a MS product as an example and it would just be there, now I actually see the MS logo for several seconds (maybe 10 seconds) while the program launches, so clearly there is a performance issue, could be those patches?
I am not having any system issues such a freezing or crashing... just seems sluggish.
Thanks again.
Cheers
John