• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Toshiba and Western Digital Readying 128-layer 3D NAND Flash

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,296 (7.53/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Toshiba and its strategic ally Western Digital are readying a high-density 128-layer 3D NAND flash memory. In Toshiba's nomenclature, the chip will be named BiCS-5. Interestingly, despite the spatial density, the chip will implement TLC (3 bits per cell), and not the newer QLC (4 bits per cell). This is probably because NAND flash makers are still spooked about the low yields of QLC chips. Regardless, the chip has a data density of 512 Gb. With 33% more capacity than 96-layer chips, the new 128-layer chips could hit commercial production in 2020-21.

The BiCS-5 chip reportedly features a 4-plane design. Its die is divided into four sections, or planes, which can each be independently accessed; as opposed to BiCS-4 chips that use a 2-plane layout. This reportedly doubles the write performance per unit-channel to 132 MB/s from 66 MB/s. The die also reportedly uses CuA (circuitry under array), a design innovation in which logic circuitry is located in the bottom-most "layer," with data layers stacked above, resulting in 15 percent die-size savings. Aaron Rakers, a high-technology industry market analyst with Wells Fargo, estimates that Toshiba-WD's yields per 300 mm wafer could be as high as 85 percent.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
If the 128L TLC effective capacity is as close to 96L QLC's as the graphs suggests, that likely implies that the lower yields of QLC are going to cause TLC to remain the mainstream flash for a while yet, while QLC's kinks are further ironed out.

Those graphs are also a bit misleading... 96L TLC numbers for the other manufacturers aren't included, and if you compare the most common listed flash between all of them (256Gb TLC), WD/Toshiba actually comes in last in TB/wafer, which means that the other manufacturers' yields on 128L should be still higher. That said, WD/Toshiba were the first to market with a 96L product in November last year already, while the others have announced they have 96L flash but haven't yet shipped 96L products.

Also, look at those MLC TB/wafer figures compared to TLC, holy hell.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,821 (1.33/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Love the 50% yield link-chain that goes back through 2 TPU snippets to Tweaktown and back to end of August.
Is QLC NAND Flash produced separately? Cannot it just binned from the same dies?
Those graphs are also a bit misleading... 96L TLC numbers for the other manufacturers aren't included, and if you compare the most common listed flash between all of them (256Gb TLC), WD/Toshiba actually comes in last in TB/wafer, which means that the other manufacturers' yields on 128L should be still higher.
The graph is not yields (it's given at iso-85% yield rate) but density. 256Gb TLC seems to be the only reasonable comparison point:
22.1 - SK Hynix (256Gb 72L TLC 3D)
27.0 - Intel/Micron (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)
20.9 - W.Digital/Toshiba (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)
24.8 - Samsung (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)
Also, look at those MLC TB/wafer figures compared to TLC, holy hell.
In addition to an additional bit there has been additional density and endurance brought to TLC (well, technically MLC as well) by 3D NAND.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
The graph is not yields (it's given at iso-85% yield rate) but density. 256Gb TLC seems to be the only reasonable comparison point:
22.1 - SK Hynix (256Gb 72L TLC 3D)
27.0 - Intel/Micron (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)
20.9 - W.Digital/Toshiba (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)
24.8 - Samsung (256Gb 64L TLC 3D)

You're correct, I wrote "yields" when I meant "density".
 
Joined
Jan 25, 2017
Messages
49 (0.02/day)
If this achievement increases the storage capacity of nand devices while lowering or maintaining current price levels, I'm happy.
 
Top