1000hz isn't perfectly stable? yet it is highly recommended? why would i drop 80 on this if it isn't stable...
I was very doubtful about this, and been thinking about it for a few days straight, and I came to the conclusion that I'd still recommend it. I knew it's gonna be controversial, but I stand by it.
There are some companies out there who produce "eSports-grade" mice that are locked to 500 Hz for stability reasons. This mouse isn't, but it takes two clicks to get it down to that value, and after that it works as intended. And again, I was able to measure, but unable to actually feel this unstableness in multiple games, on a 144 Hz monitor with high FPS counts. It's a more casual-gamer-friendly product with its features to be honest, and I'm pretty sure a casual gamer won't care about some spikes on a graph if they can't feel its downsides in-game.
On the other hand the mouse is straight up fantastic when it comes to its materials, build quality, main buttons, cable, etc.
Or 110g mouse. Or that badly shaped.
Shape is always up to personal preference, it might not work for you but it can easily be the best one for some people with a different hand size/grip style. I agree on the weight part.
Looks almost like a Logi G502 clone with a few changes to stay within the law.
It's very far off actually.