- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 2,995 (0.78/day)
Processor | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ||| Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|
Motherboard | ASUS ProArt B550-CREATOR ||| Asus P9X79 WS |
Cooling | Noctua NH-U14S ||| Be Quiet Pure Rock |
Memory | Crucial 2 x 16 GB 3200 MHz ||| Corsair 8 x 8 GB 1333 MHz |
Video Card(s) | MSI GTX 1060 3GB ||| MSI GTX 680 4GB |
Storage | Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB + 1 TB ||| Intel 545s 512 GB + 256 GB |
Display(s) | Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" ||| Eizo EV2416W 24" |
Case | Fractal Design Define 7 XL x 2 |
Audio Device(s) | Cambridge Audio DacMagic Plus |
Power Supply | Seasonic Focus PX-850 x 2 |
Mouse | Razer Abyssus |
Keyboard | CM Storm QuickFire XT |
Software | Ubuntu |
I believe Threadripper 3 was expected in Q4 or later, so I wouldn't worry to much for it lacking in the short term roadmap.
At least it's not as bad as Intel's double HEDT lineup: Skylake-X and Skylake-W.
The purpose of HEDT is CPUs for workstations, like content creators and developers, which needs a balance between core count and core speed, along with good memory bandwidth etc. Threadripper 2 largely fails as a HEDT platform due to the latency issues which becomes substantial for 2970WX and 2990WX.
Demand is certainly not the problem, but Threadripper requires higher bins than Ryzen, so supply is probably an issue for 7nm.Limited 7nm supply, lack of demand, extremely low-volume product.
TR is something they should make from surplus EPYC dies, but I doubt there are many. The 7nm supply may not be enough to make all the EPYCs they'd like to sell.
Well, they are different markets, so I guess some segmentation makes sense?Also, why not unify under the EPYC brand?
At least it's not as bad as Intel's double HEDT lineup: Skylake-X and Skylake-W.
I would ask the opposite question; why would anyone need 16 cores (for now) without other "HEDT features"? Except for market hype, why does a mainstream system need 16 cores?Is there a need for Threadripper? According to current state of leaks and assumptions, Ryzen 3000 will go up to 16 cores which would cut deeply into the already niche Threadripper. Yes, there will always be uses cases for 4 memory channels and 128 PCI-e lanes but will that justify keeping another platform?
The purpose of HEDT is CPUs for workstations, like content creators and developers, which needs a balance between core count and core speed, along with good memory bandwidth etc. Threadripper 2 largely fails as a HEDT platform due to the latency issues which becomes substantial for 2970WX and 2990WX.