AMD Computex 2019 Lisa Su CEO Keynote: Live Blog

[chaosmassive]

Don't worry, you can get the 9900KS at 300W for 5 ghz

I just get FX 9590 flashback, oh god

CPU's are impressive! Kind of lost hope in replacing my GTX 1080 with an AMD card this year unfortunately.

arent we all excited for AMD CPU only? as its common knowledge that AMD no longer fight Nvidia at flagship grade GPU since RX 400 series

 

[TheGuruStud]

Considering the competition has less cores & less IPC, though higher clocks, I can't see who's AMD milking?

He's just mad he's bent over for intel all these years and can't handle the AMD value. $850 bucks for 7900x that's going to be rofl stomped vs $500 3900x. He's panicking.

 

[Mussels]

What stands out to me is the wattage difference from 3700x to 3800x, 65W to 105W for only 300Mhz more base clock
Is this just where the power creep sets in (3.5GHz) and it becomes less cost effective to clock up, or is there something else behind the wattage increase? (better turbos, etc)

3700x looks like a low wattage power house for gamers

 

[EarthDog]

These look to be solid CPUs!

So...... what did Adored say versus what came out?

Is anyone else happy we didn't see a 16c/32t part on mainstream? hehe!

 

[Hellfire]

What stands out to me is the wattage difference from 3700x to 3800x, 65W to 105W for only 300Mhz more base clock
Is this just where the power creep sets in (3.5GHz) and it becomes less cost effective to clock up, or is there something else behind the wattage increase? (better turbos, etc)

3700x looks like a low wattage power house for gamers

For the speed, wattage and price it's s very impressive CPU, if that's their entry level example too, no more 4/6 cores?

 

[R0H1T]

What stands out to me is the wattage difference from 3700x to 3800x, 65W to 105W for only 300Mhz more base clock

Higher base clock & higher all core turbo.

 

[Hellfire]

These look to be solid CPUs!

So...... what did Adored say versus what came out?

Is anyone else happy we didn't see a 16c/32t part on mainstream? hehe!

As mostly a gamer, I don't see what 16c/32t would have offered me, I'm pretty happy with what was announced, I'm sure higher speed chips will come soon ie 3950x etc but not too fussed for the 16c right now.

 

[ViperXTR]

R5 3600 where? My target cpu, hopefullly an RX 5800 as well

 

[TheGuruStud]

What stands out to me is the wattage difference from 3700x to 3800x, 65W to 105W for only 300Mhz more base clock
Is this just where the power creep sets in (3.5GHz) and it becomes less cost effective to clock up, or is there something else behind the wattage increase? (better turbos, etc)

3700x looks like a low wattage power house for gamers

Probably like the previous gen. All core boost is -200 from single core boost on 2700x and 65W tdp chip only goes to +200 over base.

The ceiling doesn't look great, but it's not that compact. They must be heavily binning, so everything below 3900X has junk dies, but I guess we'll see. AMD notoriously overvolts.

 

[Zubasa]

These look to be solid CPUs!

So...... what did Adored say versus what came out?

Is anyone else happy we didn't see a 16c/32t part on mainstream? hehe!

It is just a matter of time for the 16-cores anyway.

 

[phanbuey]

oh my my... thank god i bought a crapton of amd stock.

As mostly a gamer, I don't see what 16c/32t would have offered me, I'm pretty happy with what was announced, I'm sure higher speed chips will come soon ie 3950x etc but not too fussed for the 16c right now.

100% agree... Intel's only advantage right now is clock speed and latency. AMD has already crushed them in $/multicore performance.

 

[dicktracy]

With the core-to-price bracket remaining the same, there's really no hope for a 64 cores Threadripper.

 

[Wavetrex]

That price per core of the 12-core is great !

Not 5 Ghz like some people have "predicted", but still dam' close ... 4.6 is not bad at all!
What a monster of a CPU, for the same introductory price as the 1800X just 2 years ago.

100% getting one + X570 + some future PCI-e 4 NVME SSD !

 

[Metroid]

AMD had the perfect time, perfect reason, 50 years, back on track after so many years behind. AMD had everything and yet they preferred to kill the hype train while they could hehe

I will still buy the 12 cores as I planned few months ago, even though I will have to pay $170 more for the 12 cores.

 

[R0H1T]

I wonder if there'd be non X variants on Ryzen 9 or low(er) power versions

AMD had the perfect time, perfect reason, 50 years, back on track after so many years behind. AMD had everything and yet they preferred to kill the hype train while they could hehe

You do realize they do have Rzyen 2xxx & TR2 to sell right

 

[Fatalfury]

What stands out to me is the wattage difference from 3700x to 3800x, 65W to 105W for only 300Mhz more base clock
Is this just where the power creep sets in (3.5GHz) and it becomes less cost effective to clock up, or is there something else behind the wattage increase? (better turbos, etc)

3700x looks like a low wattage power house for gamers

Real world TDP will be higher.. 65w does not mean exactly it..
Probably Ryzen 3500 may be 65w

 

[Xzibit]

For the speed, wattage and price it's s very impressive CPU, if that's their entry level example too, no more 4/6 cores?

Remember the Zen+ 5 series came out later as well as the B450 boards. I'm guessing a Quarter apart. July 7 if friendly to Back to School and 5 series/550 might be released by Holiday Season.

 

[L|NK|N]

AMD be like:

 

[Zubasa]

With the core-to-price bracket remaining the same, there's really no hope for a 64 cores Threadripper.

First of all M$ Windows needs to not spontaneously combust with that many cores and threads.

Did anyone else notice the absolutely insane amount of cache on the 3900x?

that should be a BEAST in games.

Every Zen2 CCX has double the L3 cache compare to Zen/+, the 3900X has access to the full amount of L3 on those dies.

 

[phanbuey]

Did anyone else notice the absolutely insane amount of cache on the 3900x?

that should be a BEAST in games.

 

[Fatalfury]

if they show flagships at computex that means Rx 5700 is the best?? ..

 

[Space Lynx]

so the rumors were indeed lies, no 5ghz boost.

I bet overclocked 9700k still beats AMD at 1080p sadly... not that it matters, but just sad... I was hoping for bigger performance jump this round. silicon is just a dying beast is all there is to it.

 

[Deleted member 158293]

Come on Intel, now you need to push AMD to release their 16 core Ryzen!

 

[EarthDog]

I bet overclocked 9700k still beats AMD at 1080p sadly... not that it matters, but just sad... I was hoping for bigger performance jump this round. silicon is just a dying beast is all there is to it.

15% IPC increase is notable, considering.

Come on Intel, now you need to push AMD to release their 16 core Ryzen!

LOL, pound sand. Nobody wants that on the mainstream!!!

 

[phanbuey]

Come on Intel, now you need to push AMD to release their 16 core Ryzen!

80 MB cache 16 core/32 @ 130W :{}

They better do something, they are in trouble lol.

15% IPC increase is notable, considering.

LOL, piss off. Nobody wants that on the mainstream!!!

NO ONE NEEDS MOAR THAN 640K!

so the rumors were indeed lies, no 5ghz boost.

I bet overclocked 9700k still beats AMD at 1080p sadly... not that it matters, but just sad... I was hoping for bigger performance jump this round. silicon is just a dying beast is all there is to it.

I think you're really underestimating the amount Cache plays into games. These chips are going to be buttery.