• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 5 3000 Series Lineup Detailed

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,194 (7.56/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 8GB G.Skill Sniper X
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
AMD at its 2019 Computex keynote unveiled its Ryzen 3000 series desktop processors with the more glamorous Ryzen 7 and Ryzen 9 SKUs while glossing over its more high-volume Ryzen 5 3000 series. It turns out that AMD will launch even these chips on the 7th of July. The Ryzen 5 lineup includes the 3600X and 3600. Both these chips are 6-core/12-thread, and AMD is taking the fight to Intel's 9th generation Core i5 series by not touching the core-count and instead focusing on higher IPC and clock-speeds than Intel's offerings.

The Ryzen 5 3600X ticks at 3.80 GHz, with a boost frequency of 4.40 GHz, which is among the highest in the lineup. Its TDP is rated at 95W. The Ryzen 5 3600 is the 'cooler' offering of the two, with 3.60 GHz nominal and 4.20 GHz boost clocks, and 65W TDP. You get the same 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache, as the 8-core Ryzen 7 series offerings. AMD is expected to price the two along expected lines, with the 3600X going for roughly USD $239, and the 3600 at $199.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,732 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Is the next news snippet about Ryzen 7 and then for Ryzen 9 series?
You can consolidate information into one piece you know. Especially if it is already there in a single one.

How about a table with both current and upcoming Ryzen 5 specs:
Ryzen 5 3600X | 6 cores / 12 threads | 3.8/4.4 GHz | 95W | $249
Ryzen 5 3600 | 6 cores / 12 threads | 3.6/4.2 GHz | 65W | $199
Ryzen 5 2600X | 6 cores / 12 threads | 3.6/4.2 GHz | 95W | $229
Ryzen 5 2600 | 6 cores / 12 threads | 3.4/3.9 GHz | 65W | $199
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
482 (0.16/day)
So like me and a few other sensible posters had been saying, only to be derided, the AdoredTV hype train chart from December that everyone was whipped up into a frenzy about was total BS.

The sanity check should have been applied when this 'leaker' (did Adored make it up himself?) revealed that the 12-core had a 4.2Ghz BASE clock and the 16-core had a 4.3Ghz base clock. It turns out the purported (fanfiction) base clock of the 12-core was only 400Mhz lower than it's real BOOST clock!

- His SKUs were all wrong, core counts weren't moved down a stack
- APU info was totally wrong, prices were off massively (there is no miracle $99 6-core, there is one that is just...double that price)
- Clocks are not just slightly lower but 400Mhz off in base and boost in some cases...
- And to round it all off, his info on Navi from the same hype December video was completely wrong.

Ban Adored as a credible news source from now on please TPU, or at least, please do not make news stories on his info. Thanks

The Ryzen 9 3900X will have a suggested e-tail price of $499, and it will come with a cooler (more details in the coming weeks). AMD compared this processor in its presentations to Intel’s 12-core HEDT processor, the Core i9-9920X, which has an MSRP of $1199 and doesn’t come with a cooler.

In this comparison, AMD provided Cinebench R20 performance data comparing the two processors (it should be noted that we can’t confirm these results at this time). AMD states that in single thread performance, the 3900X beats the 9920X by +14%, and also wins in multi-threaded performance by 6%, all while having a lower TDP (165W vs 105W).

This is a monster. Totally wipes the floor with the only Intel equivalent.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,421 (0.35/day)
I made an updated AdoredTV table, in case anyone is interested. :)
123840
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,523 (2.40/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
@Shatun_Bear FYI, AMD didn't even tell the motherboard makers what the launch lineup would be.
The leaks had a lot of correct information, but the SKU names and pricing obviously changed, as well as some clocks.
Since when are leaks every considered fact?
I knew a bunch of details since the end of last year, but not everything ended up being exactly as what I knew.
In fact, AMD seeded different CPU SKUs to the motherboard makers to test.
You can't say that the leaks were incorrect at the time the information what released.
I know for a fact that AMD has a lot more coming, as to why they only launched what they did today, I can't say.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
482 (0.16/day)
@Shatun_Bear FYI, AMD didn't even tell the motherboard makers what the launch lineup would be.
The leaks had a lot of correct information, but the SKU names and pricing obviously changed, as well as some clocks.
Since when are leaks every considered fact?
I knew a bunch of details since the end of last year, but not everything ended up being exactly as what I knew.
In fact, AMD seeded different CPU SKUs to the motherboard makers to test.
You can't say that the leaks were incorrect at the time the information what released.
I know for a fact that AMD has a lot more coming, as to why they only launched what they did today, I can't say.

I'm sorry but you've lost some credibility too by trying to defend him. The only things he got right were guesses like the R9 (of course AMD would copy Intel) and core count (again, of course they would offer more than 8-cores).

The rest, both Ryzen 3000 and Navi are only about...98% wrong. So we now know that his list of every SKU, specs and prices from December was basically made up or guesses. Don't give me this cr*p 'these were targets only'. If those specs of his were targets, then AMD have had a huge failure as they missed clockspeeds by 400Mhz!! So yeah, that's totally not the case, they weren't targets, they were made up and there's no way Adored or a leaker would be privy to all that info 8 months before release. Give it up and at least distance yourself from his BS.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,523 (2.40/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
I'm sorry but you've lost some credibility too by trying to defend him. The only things he got right were guesses like the R9 (of course AMD would copy Intel) and core count (again, of course they would offer more than 8-cores).

The rest, both Ryzen 3000 and Navi are only about...98% wrong. So we now know that his list of every SKU, specs and prices from December was basically made up or guesses. Don't give me this cr*p 'these were targets only'. If those specs of his were targets, then AMD have had a huge failure as they missed clockspeeds by 400Mhz!! So yeah, that's totally not the case, they weren't targets, they were made up and there's no way Adored or a leaker would be privy to all that info 8 months before release. Give it up and at least distance yourself from his BS.

Why would I distance myself from something that was most likely correct at the time? I have known about much of what's coming since early October last year. You don't seem to care about that. The motherboard makers were given 5GHz parts just a few weeks ago. I don't know why AMD went conservative and didn't launch them, nor the 16 core parts which are also with the board makers.
I don't work for AMD, so I can't tell you why they did what they did, but I guess they feel the launch parts are good enough for now.

This is for you...

 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
482 (0.16/day)
Why would I distance myself from something that was most likely correct at the time? I have known about much of what's coming since early October last year. You don't seem to care about that. The motherboard makers were given 5GHz parts just a few weeks ago. I don't know why AMD went conservative and didn't launch them, nor the 16 core parts which are also with the board makers.
I don't work for AMD, so I can't tell you why they did what they did, but I guess they feel the launch parts are good enough for now.

Just stop. There are no 5Ghz parts, why would they hide 400Mhz? I'm putting you on ignore if you persist with this BS.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
2,258 (0.39/day)
System Name Budget AMD System
Processor Threadripper 1900X @ 4.1Ghz (100x41 @ 1.3250V)
Motherboard Gigabyte X399 Aorus Gaming 7
Cooling EKWB X399 Monoblock
Memory 4x8GB GSkill TridentZ RGB 14-14-14-32 CR1 @ 3266
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX Vega₆⁴ Liquid @ 1,800Mhz Core, 1025Mhz HBM2
Storage 1x ADATA SX8200 NVMe, 1x Segate 2.5" FireCuda 2TB SATA, 1x 500GB HGST SATA
Display(s) Vizio 22" 1080p 60hz TV (Samsung Panel)
Case Corsair 570X
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic X Series 850W KM3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I'm sorry but you've lost some credibility too by trying to defend him. The only things he got right were guesses like the R9 (of course AMD would copy Intel) and core count (again, of course they would offer more than 8-cores).

The rest, both Ryzen 3000 and Navi are only about...98% wrong. So we now know that his list of every SKU, specs and prices from December was basically made up or guesses. Don't give me this cr*p 'these were targets only'. If those specs of his were targets, then AMD have had a huge failure as they missed clockspeeds by 400Mhz!! So yeah, that's totally not the case, they weren't targets, they were made up and there's no way Adored or a leaker would be privy to all that info 8 months before release. Give it up and at least distance yourself from his BS.

My AMD source didn't really nail anything down till 3-4 months ago. Even then, he was telling me clocks weren't where they really wanted them to be due to power limits. Basically, thermal density was just too high. AMD was going for that 65W limit.

So I can see where you are coming from here but... my source also said they kept everything fluid because they didn't know what Intel had. So the final decisions on clocks etc.. were made about 2 months ago. As for pricing, my source told me nothing until about 10 hours before the event. My guess was $799 for the 12-core part. But he flat out said... $499. The thing with Adored, and I don't understand it is this.. He releases a bunch of information and I would think... over time.. his sources will be discovered and silenced. Oh well... I just hope my AMD source is right on Threadripper 3rd Gen. (He says its still on the table.. just gonna be later than expected.. )
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
1,784 (0.61/day)
Location
BGD
System Name Minotaur
Processor Intel I9 7940X
Motherboard Asus Strix Rog Gaming E X299
Cooling BeQuiet/ double-Fan
Memory 192Gb of RAM DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) 1)RX 6900XT BIOSTAR 16Gb***2)MATROX M9120LP
Storage 2 x ssd-Kingston 240Gb A400 in RAID 0+ HDD 500Gb +Samsung 128gbSSD +SSD Kinston 480Gb
Display(s) BenQ 28"EL2870U(4K-HDR) / Acer 24"(1080P) / Eizo 2336W(1080p) / 2x Eizo 19"(1280x1024)
Case NZXT H5 Flow
Audio Device(s) Realtek/Creative T20 Speakers
Power Supply F S P Hyper S 700W
Mouse Asus TUF-GAMING M3
Keyboard Func FUNC-KB-460/Mechanical Keyboard
VR HMD Oculus Rift DK2
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike=23905,Cinebench R15=3167,Cinebench R20=7490.Passmark=30689,Geekbench4=32885
IPC imporovments on new Ryzen 3000 looks GREAT also power consumption is significantly reduced.....tho' price could be a bit better but to be honest that is kind of expected as they have a lot of "old" stock of previous Ryzens to sell....
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,523 (2.40/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Just stop. There are no 5Ghz parts, why would they hide 400Mhz? I'm putting you on ignore if you persist with this BS.
Why wouldn't I persist about something that's true? I've seen it. But whatever...

By the by, that chipset diagram hasn't been posted anywhere until today. If you look closely, you'll see there's a x8 CPU link option too...
Did AMD mention that?

@Flyordie afaik, it's still on the table. AMD hasn't told the board makers to stop working, so something must be coming out, the question is when.
 
Last edited:

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,421 (0.35/day)
I don't really care if AdoredTV lied, or if Lisa Su would step in and confirm that his specs were correct at one point in time.
And no, I don't think he lied.

It doesn't matter now, because almost nothing he said back then matches the reality today. We have no use of such leaks, even if they valid at the time.

All we can do is remember this hype train to the next time. (..yeah, as if it never happened before. :roll: )
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2010
Messages
1,632 (0.30/day)
Location
Azalea City
System Name Main
Processor Ryzen 5950x
Motherboard B550 PG Velocita
Cooling Water
Memory Ballistix
Video Card(s) RX 6900XT
Storage T-FORCE CARDEA A440 PRO
Display(s) MAG401QR
Case QUBE 500
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z623
Power Supply LEADEX V 1KW
Mouse Cooler Master MM710
Keyboard Huntsman Elite
Software 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/damric/
I'm guessing they are sandbagging the full 16 core part for later. They are a 8 cores per cluster, so the 12 core part must have disabled cores. They probably were expecting Intel to have something better, but it turns out they can beat them with the 12 core part, so why not hold the ace in their sleeve for later. If these are indeed just TDP limited then we should have good headroom to play with overclocking. What a great year for pc builders!
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.08/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Just stop. There are no 5Ghz parts, why would they hide 400Mhz? I'm putting you on ignore if you persist with this BS.
Mate you're embarrassing yourself, for a start tpu have never quoted adoredtv as fact or news so stop throwing around libellous accusations stating that they have, for another thing you don't know what amd are going to release on 7th July along with the rest of us so stop attacking other members who quite frankly seem to be in the know a lot more than you are, though you can't seem to see that. Put the phone down, turn off the pc and go for a walk outside and stop throwing rants at people on the Internet
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,421 (0.35/day)
tpu have never quoted adoredtv as fact or news
I'm not so sure aboout that.

"The infamous Adored TV leaks that drew the skeleton of AMD's 3rd generation Ryzen roadmap, referenced two desktop Ryzen 9 parts, the Ryzen 9 3800X and Ryzen 9 3850X. The 3800X is supposed to be clocked at 3.90 GHz with 4.70 GHz boost, with a TDP rating of 125W, while the 3850X tops the charts at 4.30 GHz base and a staggering 5.10 GHz boost. The rated TDP has shot up to 135W. "
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
184 (0.07/day)
System Name Linotosh
Processor Dual 800mhz G4
Cooling Air
Memory 1.5 GB
I hope there is an option in the bios to enable the disabled cores. I'm sure there will be some processors that have fully functional cores disabled like they did in the days of the phenom x3. I had one that was an x3 with the 4th core disabled and was able to enable it in bios and run the full 4 cores without an issue. I'm sure they won't allow that this time, but one can dream.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.08/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
I'm not so sure aboout that.

"The infamous Adored TV leaks that drew the skeleton of AMD's 3rd generation Ryzen roadmap, referenced two desktop Ryzen 9 parts, the Ryzen 9 3800X and Ryzen 9 3850X. The 3800X is supposed to be clocked at 3.90 GHz with 4.70 GHz boost, with a TDP rating of 125W, while the 3850X tops the charts at 4.30 GHz base and a staggering 5.10 GHz boost. The rated TDP has shot up to 135W. "
Supposed... You see that?
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,079 (0.74/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
Ryzen 3000 does what it needs to do. The products match/beat the equivalent Intel chips and are more efficient in the process, sometimes largely so. To say the launch products are running at the limits of the architecture is an assumption we can’t make. We have no idea what clocking headroom there is left, but we sure do have a good idea that the 3900X could have those last two CPU cores enabled.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.79/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
4.4 boost? That's not great.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.08/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Yeah, but now we're splitting hairs. :D
TPU did quote specs from AdoredTV, "supposed"/"possibly"/"maybe" or not.

I'd rather they didn't at all.
No it literally said supposed, there's no ifs or buts about it, do you really need that explaining
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,079 (0.74/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
4.4 boost? That's not great.
...with 15% IPC lift and at 65W. They are matching Intel 5.0 GHz with 4.4GHz. And the 3900X boosts to 4.6GHz at 105W.

Also, EPYC is likely eating all the best chiplets right now anyway. Better margins there, I’m sure.
 
Top