• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 5 3000 Series Lineup Detailed

Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.07/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
I said the specs are there, and "supposed" doesn't change that.
Well yes, it makes a big difference as to a statement being fact or not, which was my point that wasn't aimed at you in the first place anyway though you felt the need to make it yours
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.77/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,756 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
Pics or didn't happen.
Cinebench R20:


Single-thread boost clocks:
9700K 4.9 GHz
3700X 4.4 GHz +1%
9900K 5.0 GHz +2%
3800X 4.5 GHz +3%
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
2,117 (0.75/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo

Attachments

  • D1E0BA95-2DDC-431D-B037-B47A16D52F2A.jpeg
    D1E0BA95-2DDC-431D-B037-B47A16D52F2A.jpeg
    38.9 KB · Views: 158
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Interesting to see all the bile and spite thrown at AdoredTV (pretty much the only tech journalist left that's not living cosily in the pocket of a tech company) here. It's very interesting to note that he has ALWAYS said to take the 5GHz info with a bucket of salt, and doubted it highly, but that does not stop the Intel police from losing their minds over what AMD has just achieved. Infact I would say it's even better that a lower clocked AMD part can beat a higher clocked Intel part, adds a little more venom to the bite, does it not? lol

I'm currently running an i7 4770k, after being a loyal Intel customer for more than 12 years. Not any longer, especially as I've lost more than 20% (nearly a whole CPU core) of the IPC my CPU can give, due to Intel's security leaks. Intel offers nothing that is competitive for my wallet.

I, for one, are looking forward to jumping ship.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.77/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Edit: Ninja’d by londsite.
Ah that's what you meant,I get it now.I thought it can match it core for core across the board,gaming included.That's brute forcing higher cinebench scores with more cores.
What is 3800x core config? 8c or 10c?
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
3,756 (1.32/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WIFI
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Flare X5 DDR5-6000 CL36 (F5-6000J3636F16GX2-FX5)
Video Card(s) INNO3D GeForce RTX™ 4070 Ti SUPER TWIN X2
Storage 2TB Samsung 980 PRO, 4TB WD Black SN850X
Display(s) 42" LG C2 OLED, 27" ASUS PG279Q
Case Thermaltake Core P5
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ Platinum 760W
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB Pro SE
Keyboard Corsair K100 RGB
VR HMD HTC Vive Cosmos
The 9900K runs at 4,7 GHz turbo all core.
Depends on testing conditions. It should definitely not run Cinebench R20 (with AVX2) at this high frequency.
Ah that's what you meant,I get it now.I thought it can match it core for core across the board,gaming included.That's brute forcing higher cinebench scores with more cores.
What is 3800x core config? 8c or 10c?
8c/16t.
The bunch of graphs on the left are single-core results (supposedly with maxed boost clocks).
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,449 (0.36/day)
Depends on testing conditions. It should definitely not run Cinebench R20 (with AVX2) at this high frequency.
You're right. I was trying to point out that the 9900K couldn't run at 5 GHz all core, but like you say, it's probably lower than that.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.77/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Depends on testing conditions. It should definitely not run Cinebench R20 (with AVX2) at this high frequency.
8c/16t.
The bunch of graphs on the left are single-core results (supposedly with maxed boost clocks).
Then it's really good.
Although I just checked 2700x vs 9900k and tpu shows 9900k only 5 percent faster,that'd make 3800x 8 percent faster than 2700x
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 26, 2016
Messages
1,789 (0.61/day)
Location
BGD
System Name Minotaur
Processor Intel I9 7940X
Motherboard Asus Strix Rog Gaming E X299
Cooling BeQuiet/ double-Fan
Memory 192Gb of RAM DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) 1)RX 6900XT BIOSTAR 16Gb***2)MATROX M9120LP
Storage 2 x ssd-Kingston 240Gb A400 in RAID 0+ HDD 500Gb +Samsung 128gbSSD +SSD Kinston 480Gb
Display(s) BenQ 28"EL2870U(4K-HDR) / Acer 24"(1080P) / Eizo 2336W(1080p) / 2x Eizo 19"(1280x1024)
Case NZXT H5 Flow
Audio Device(s) Realtek/Creative T20 Speakers
Power Supply F S P Hyper S 700W
Mouse Asus TUF-GAMING M3
Keyboard Func FUNC-KB-460/Mechanical Keyboard
VR HMD Oculus Rift DK2
Software Win 11
Benchmark Scores Fire Strike=23905,Cinebench R15=3167,Cinebench R20=7490.Passmark=30689,Geekbench4=32885
Do you guys think that AMD potentially could pull out from the hat also a 10 core Ryzen 3000 cpu?
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2018
Messages
1,227 (0.51/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero WiFi
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420
Memory 32Gb G-Skill Trident Z Neo @3806MHz C14
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX2070
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 1TB
Display(s) Samsung G9 49" Curved Ultrawide
Case Cooler Master Cosmos
Audio Device(s) O2 USB Headphone AMP
Power Supply Corsair HX850i
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Cherry MX
Software Windows 11
Do you guys think that AMD potentially could pull out from the hat also a 10 core Ryzen 3000 cpu?
Struggling to see the point... But I would think it's technically possible...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,703 (0.54/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Do you guys think that AMD potentially could pull out from the hat also a 10 core Ryzen 3000 cpu?
Ofc not since they will use 6 or 8 cores per chiplet as already shown by their line up.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,568 (0.65/day)
Location
London, UK
...with 15% IPC lift and at 65W. They are matching Intel 5.0 GHz with 4.4GHz. And the 3900X boosts to 4.6GHz at 105W.

Also, EPYC is likely eating all the best chiplets right now anyway. Better margins there, I’m sure.

We still need to see reviews that confirm that, one thing to consider, you said that amd is matching intel 5ghz with 4.4ghz, that is 600mhz difference, that is 15% and yet amd released a chart stating 1 to 4% faster single thread performance. If all you said turns out to be true in july 7 then we can see a 16% better single thread performance if we compare 3700x x 9700k at this moment.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,653 (2.41/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
Do you guys think that AMD potentially could pull out from the hat also a 10 core Ryzen 3000 cpu?

Could yes, will, maybe not. A 16 core part will be available at some point, as that's been seeded to the board makers.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.24/day)
So like me and a few other sensible posters had been saying, only to be derided, the AdoredTV hype train chart from December that everyone was whipped up into a frenzy about was total BS.

The sanity check should have been applied when this 'leaker' (did Adored make it up himself?) revealed that the 12-core had a 4.2Ghz BASE clock and the 16-core had a 4.3Ghz base clock. It turns out the purported (fanfiction) base clock of the 12-core was only 400Mhz lower than it's real BOOST clock!

- His SKUs were all wrong, core counts weren't moved down a stack
- APU info was totally wrong, prices were off massively (there is no miracle $99 6-core, there is one that is just...double that price)
- Clocks are not just slightly lower but 400Mhz off in base and boost in some cases...
- And to round it all off, his info on Navi from the same hype December video was completely wrong.

Ban Adored as a credible news source from now on please TPU, or at least, please do not make news stories on his info. Thanks



This is a monster. Totally wipes the floor with the only Intel equivalent.
If you wait a performance based on a leaker based on rumours, it's your problem. :)

3700X with 9700K and 3800X with 9900K gaming performance for less power consumption and $100 cheaper, that is very very nice.
 

TheLostSwede

News Editor
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
17,653 (2.41/day)
Location
Sweden
System Name Overlord Mk MLI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X670E Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 SE with offsets
Memory 32GB Team T-Create Expert DDR5 6000 MHz @ CL30-34-34-68
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 4080 Phantom GS
Storage 1TB Solidigm P44 Pro, 2 TB Corsair MP600 Pro, 2TB Kingston KC3000
Display(s) Acer XV272K LVbmiipruzx 4K@160Hz
Case Fractal Design Torrent Compact
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 12 M 850 W
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Corsair K70 Max
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/yfsd9w
And here are some 16 core details... Yes, more rumours if you'd like...
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
274 (0.06/day)
lol someone is salty by adoredtv. Calling it a 'news source' is laughable. It was rumor and speculation, it was said numerous times take it with a grain of salt. Anyone triggerd and bitter and calling 'hype train' and calling for a ban (lol) is maybe a little too emotionally invested.
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,449 (0.36/day)
And here are some 16 core details... Yes, more rumours if you'd like...
I fail to see the reasoning behind the model numbers. 3700X and 3800X are both 8C, 3900X is 12C, which doesn't leave much room for the 16C.
The two 8C is farther apart than the 12C and the 16C, in numbers. It should have been 3700X & 3750X, 3800X, and 3900X.

Yeah, I don't really care that much, the performance is more important, but still, it's kind of weird.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,536 (1.77/day)
We still need to see reviews that confirm that, one thing to consider, you said that amd is matching intel 5ghz with 4.4ghz, that is 600mhz difference, that is 15% and yet amd released a chart stating 1 to 4% faster single thread performance. If all you said turns out to be true in july 7 then we can see a 16% better single thread performance if we compare 3700x x 9700k at this moment.
15% isn't just for single threaded workloads, also IPC isn't a fixed number ~ it changes with application, processors (same uarch different cache size like 8700k/9900k) & finally HT, in some edge cases memory speeds as well.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,568 (0.65/day)
Location
London, UK
15% isn't just for single threaded workloads, also IPC isn't a fixed number ~ it changes with application, processors (same uarch different cache size like 8700k/9900k) & finally HT, in some edge cases memory speeds as well.

Just to be clear, they said ipc 15% on tests they conducted x zen+. As I said before we will have to wait for reviews to have a broad understanding about it. Single thread performance is what I most care about, if I wanted more cores aka multi-thread i would go for server cpus.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,536 (1.77/day)
Just to be clear, they said ipc 15% on tests they conducted.
Yes & most of them would be MT runs as long as the application supports it, you don't purposefully limit your application to a single core.
Single thread performance is what I most care about, if I wanted more cores i would go for server cpus.
ST or single core? There's a slight difference, I also believe AMD have taken the lead in ST tasks.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,568 (0.65/day)
Location
London, UK
Yes & most of them would be MT runs as long as the application supports it, you don't purposefully limit your application to a single core.
ST or single core? There's a slight difference, I also believe AMD have taken the lead in ST tasks.

There are many old apps and games that are limited to a single core, their exe was never updated to support multicores, most because the engine as a whole has a single thread limitation. So for those apps of games single thread performance is what is important, for example, simulators, I play simcity 4 a lot and that is limited to a single thread performance, billions of cores/threads wont help that.

Also just to clear things up, single core might have one or 2 threads due to hyperthreading or smt, application like the example i gave above, simcity 4 will take just one thread to work with so, hyperthreading wont help it and in many cases will make it worse cause the thread performance has resources shared between the threads, reason why i applaud 9700k, I have no idea how is done on amd, with popularity growing on amd, I hope if they dont have a way yet, a function to disable smt altogether, i really think I should have the choice to choose if I want smt or not.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
482 (0.16/day)
Mate you're embarrassing yourself, for a start tpu have never quoted adoredtv as fact or news so stop throwing around libellous accusations stating that they have, for another thing you don't know what amd are going to release on 7th July along with the rest of us so stop attacking other members who quite frankly seem to be in the know a lot more than you are, though you can't seem to see that. Put the phone down, turn off the pc and go for a walk outside and stop throwing rants at people on the Internet

Don't embarrass yourself, they have used him as a source, just look at the reply to your post.

Interesting to see all the bile and spite thrown at AdoredTV (pretty much the only tech journalist left that's not living cosily in the pocket of a tech company) here. It's very interesting to note that he has ALWAYS said to take the 5GHz info with a bucket of salt, and doubted it highly, but that does not stop the Intel police from losing their minds over what AMD has just achieved. Infact I would say it's even better that a lower clocked AMD part can beat a higher clocked Intel part, adds a little more venom to the bite, does it not? lol

No, NO HE DIDN'T! I can't believe he has so many defenders. He was literally hinting that we should be so excited about Ryzen 3000 because of the 5Ghz+ clockspeeds, he believed it very much, so you're spouting nonsense to defend him.
 
Top