- Joined
- Mar 10, 2010
- Messages
- 11,878 (2.20/day)
- Location
- Manchester uk
System Name | RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II |
---|---|
Processor | Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H |
Motherboard | Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus |
Cooling | 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK |
Memory | Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB |
Video Card(s) | Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060 |
Storage | Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme |
Display(s) | Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter |
Case | Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2 |
Audio Device(s) | Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset |
Power Supply | corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock |
Mouse | Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless |
Keyboard | Roccat Aimo 120 |
VR HMD | Oculus rift |
Software | Win 10 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506 |
Im not here to back his word on it ,i get you and him, I was just adding my opinion.All of this is true, but, again, @juiseman was implying that because Intel fucked up the engineering of 10nm, that intel would therefore be incapable of implementing PCI-E 5.0 on time.
Would you, @theoneandonlymrk, please like to explain to me, exactly how juiseman's point is true, bearing in mind that:
1 - designing a controller to implement an existing standard is nowhere near as complicated as building a new semiconductor manufacturing process from scratch
2 - PCI-SIG doesn't release standards that aren't ready to be implemented, whereas Intel *did* announce a 10nm technology that was nowhere near implementation.
Which was that Intel's reluctance to advance their architecture is clear to see and detrimental to their profit line.
But why, ask that question, they have not even upped lane count though they are changing the designs ,adding cores , security and even increasing the Gpu capabilities.
Amd did a lot of work to get to zen, The pciex 4 support work should have been mirrored by intel, probably lead by, but no ,they NEED the die space to get anywhere near competitive on core counts which likely has constrained their design, I think 2022 is a pipe dream though because they're going to be too busy and constrained to bring pciex5 to consumer's.
ImHo it will take Intel's new Arch on 7nm euv to make room for that and I don't see that coming before 2023-4.
Just my opinion though feel free to disagree.