- Joined
- Nov 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,213 (0.71/day)
- Location
- Vietnam
System Name | Gaming System / HTPC-Server |
---|---|
Processor | i7 8700K (@4.8 Ghz All-Core) / R7 5900X |
Motherboard | Z370 Aorus Ultra Gaming / MSI B450 Mortar Max |
Cooling | CM ML360 / CM ML240L |
Memory | 16Gb Hynix @3200 MHz / 16Gb Hynix @3000Mhz |
Video Card(s) | Zotac 3080 / Colorful 1060 |
Storage | 750G MX300 + 2x500G NVMe / 40Tb Reds + 1Tb WD Blue NVMe |
Display(s) | LG 27GN800-B 27'' 2K 144Hz / Sony TV |
Case | Xigmatek Aquarius Plus / Corsair Air 240 |
Audio Device(s) | On Board Realtek |
Power Supply | Super Flower Leadex III Gold 750W / Andyson TX-700 Platinum |
Mouse | Logitech G502 Hero / K400+ |
Keyboard | Wooting Two / K400+ |
Software | Windows 10 x64 |
Benchmark Scores | Cinebench R15 = 1542 3D Mark Timespy = 9758 |
Question as title.
I've been overclocking computers for 25+ years now since the days of the 486 where everything was jumper based and in that time have used TIM from a large number of different companies.
The best for me have been OCZ freeze and MX-4 as they were so easy to work with. The ocz freeze literally just needed a grain of rice and it would spread easily and evenly and give great temps.
The hardest I've worked with is Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut. That stuff is like modelling clay and just refuses to stick to anything without using copious amounts (which defeats the purpose).
CLU is really hard to work with as the tolerance for too much vs. too little is so small, but the results when you get it right are worth it.
I've been overclocking computers for 25+ years now since the days of the 486 where everything was jumper based and in that time have used TIM from a large number of different companies.
The best for me have been OCZ freeze and MX-4 as they were so easy to work with. The ocz freeze literally just needed a grain of rice and it would spread easily and evenly and give great temps.
The hardest I've worked with is Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut. That stuff is like modelling clay and just refuses to stick to anything without using copious amounts (which defeats the purpose).
CLU is really hard to work with as the tolerance for too much vs. too little is so small, but the results when you get it right are worth it.