- Joined
- Aug 21, 2013
- Messages
- 2,207 (0.51/day)
- Location
- Estonia
System Name | DarkStar |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master 1.0 (BIOS F39g) |
Cooling | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm AIO (rev4) |
Memory | 4x8GB Patriot Viper DDR4 4400C19 @ 3733Mhz 14-14-13-27 1T |
Video Card(s) | Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB GDDR6 @ 3400Mhz Core/22Gbps Mem |
Storage | 1TB Samsung 990 Pro (OS);2TB Samsung PM9A1;4TB XPG S70 Blade (Games);14TB WD UltraStar HC530 (Video) |
Display(s) | 27" LG UltraGear 27GS85Q-B @ 2560x1440 @ 200Hz, Nano-IPS |
Case | be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900 Rev.2 |
Audio Device(s) | SteelSeries Arctis Nova Pro Wireless |
Power Supply | 1000W Seasonic PRIME Ultra Titanium;600W APC SMT750i UPS |
Mouse | Logitech G604 |
Keyboard | Logitech G910 Orion Spark |
Software | Windows 11 Pro x64 24H2 (Build 26100.4351) |
Non-existant product that passed certification. Yeah seems really non-existant to me for AMD submit something that does not exist.Do you, guys, realize that you are arguing over a non-existent product?
Rumors of "Big Navi" have been debunked some time ago, and "Arcturus" is a made-up name that someone came up with almost 2 years ago and everyone still uses it (even though it's not a thing).
Having a 225W RX5700XT is already a good-enough sign that consumer cards are near the upper TDP cap, so the most we could actually hope for is a 48CU Navi card, maybe on 7nm+ process.
Also, the majority of consumer GPU market segments are covered already, and as with Polaris, there's no need to rush for that 0.01% that'll give up their 2080Ti in favor of marginally faster AMD flagship.
I would like to read those debunkings about big navi. Who said it and when. Even Lisa Su said you can expect a 4K capable card this year. And i doubt she meant running 4K 30 or 4K low.
That's as official as it gets. We will learn more next month during AMD's Financial briefing.
Codenames are irrelevant and often wrong. So what if Arcturus is not a name they will use? The product (MI100) still exists.
The only reason why we have a 225W RDNA right now is that it's the first generation. I have no doubt AMD will improve power efficiency with RDNA 2.0. Problably lower clocks and fitting a 80 CU card inside 300W limit is not a big deal. Plus IPC increase from architectural improvements.