Xeon Owners Club

[Zyll Goliat]

 

[Edwired]

It was 20 years ago. Use a different email and use a nick name, DON'T give them your SSN. Easy. Unless you live at the same house with the same phone number, they're not going to know it's you. Legally they can't ban you for life.

I was thinking the same thing jeez why a lawsuit against ebay?

He surely lost his marbles

 

[stinger608]

It was 20 years ago. Use a different email and use a nick name, DON'T give them your SSN. Easy. Unless you live at the same house with the same phone number, they're not going to know it's you. Legally they can't ban you for life.

Yeah, I suppose I could give it a shot.

 

[Edwired]

I have beginning to notice something going on with cinebench r20 the max score i got was topped out 1890cb and when to check it after the latest os update came the other day i lost points as it went down to 1882 can anyone do the comparison of what they had before and after result. What was stranger is that from 1890cb after a couple of restart it kept losing 1cb each time. Was concerned about it since

 

[lexluthermiester]

I have beginning to notice something going on with cinebench r20 the max score i got was topped out 1890cb and when to check it after the latest os update came the other day i lost points as it went down to 1882 can anyone do the comparison of what they had before and after result. What was stranger is that from 1890cb after a couple of restart it kept losing 1cb each time. Was concerned about it since

Looks like a statistical margin of error to me.

 

[Zyll Goliat]

I have beginning to notice something going on with cinebench r20 the max score i got was topped out 1890cb and when to check it after the latest os update came the other day i lost points as it went down to 1882 can anyone do the comparison of what they had before and after result. What was stranger is that from 1890cb after a couple of restart it kept losing 1cb each time. Was concerned about it since

Totally normal as @lexluthermiester said probably just a margin of error but also most likely sometimes depends of your background apps in system/win as I notice the best scores I get in general are soon as system is up and before I did anything else.......

 

[Edwired]

I dont know know kinda strange reallly same thing happened in cinebench r15

 

[Mr.Scott]

I dont know know kinda strange reallly same thing happened in cinebench r15

That makes sense, they are pretty much the same rendering engine.
FWIW, as a competitive bencher, I bench these all the time. Best runs are always the first run on a fresh cold boot. Every run after produces an increasingly less score.
Not abnormal at all IMO.

 

[Edwired]

That makes sense, they are pretty much the same rendering engine.
FWIW, as a competitive bencher, I bench these all the time. Best runs are always the first run on a fresh cold boot. Every run after produces an increasingly less score.
Not abnormal at all IMO.

Suppose you right about that. I noticed in both cinebench it said xeon x5650 is 12 cores 12 threads unless that be the dual cpu setup???

 

[Zyll Goliat]

Suppose you right about that. I noticed in both cinebench it said xeon x5650 is 12 cores 12 threads unless that be the dual cpu setup???

That's dual CPU score.......

 

[Edwired]

Cool quite an unfair advantage to the single cpu lol

 

[Mr.Scott]

 

[lexluthermiester]

Nice OC.

 

[Edwired]

Look like he got good bin cpu and ram

@lexluthermiester Just wondering does lengthen trfc helps with solving memory management error?

 

[lexluthermiester]

Look like he got good bin cpu and ram

@lexluthermiester Just wondering does lengthen trfc helps with solving memory management error?

I would leave it be(default), stick with SPD or XMP profiles settings.

 

[Caring1]

Look like he got good bin cpu and ram

@lexluthermiester Just wondering does lengthen trfc helps with solving memory management error?

I believe it can.
@TheLostSwede
Your input?

 

[Edwired]

In cpuid memory is listed 9-9-9-24-88-t2
@lexluthermiester I had to set it manually as it wont boot once i bump up the bclk pass certain number cant remember exactly it throws memory manaagment error bsoc

 

[lexluthermiester]

In cpuid memory is listed 9-9-9-24-88-t2
@lexluthermiester I had to set it manually as it wont boot once i bump up the bclk pass certain number cant remember exactly it throws memory manaagment error bsoc

Ah ok, I see what you are doing. In that case, relaxing the the tRFC might help with RAM stability if it's the RAM giving you issues. What might be better is to relax the timings to 10-10-10-28-96-t2. If you're trying the OC I think you are(205mhz+BCLK), those timings will not reduce RAM bandwidth by anything you'll notice, but will give the rest of the components on the board and the CPU memory controller a little bit of "wiggle" room.

 

[Edwired]

I was at 155 bclk with turbo enabled if i go anywhere near 160 it falls flat on it face. With the previous settings i was getting about 1900 or 1899 points in cinebench r20 but with the turbo disabled i had to push up the bclk it still falls real short of the cinebench r20 points

 

[lexluthermiester]

I was at 155 bclk with turbo enabled if i go anywhere near 160 it falls flat on it face. With the previous settings i was getting about 1900 or 1899 points in cinebench r20 but with the turbo disabled i had to push up the bclk it still falls real short of the cinebench r20 points

Oh wow. Have you tried 200BCLK with a lower multi? If you're talking about the X5675 you mentioned earlier in the thread you should be able to push it 21 x 201mhz bclk(4221mhz). That bclk will run the ram at spec but give a great result. 167mhz bclk should render a similar ram stable spec. The reason the OC has failing at 160 is because the ram is being pushed too far out of spec, IIRC.

 

[Mr.Scott]

My 5675's work better at 187 x 23 than at 205 x 21. Ram speed is about 1866 either way.
200 is the spot to shoot for initially. You can tweak at little either way once you figure out what your setup likes.
If you get up toward 215-220, things get a lot tougher.
Odd multi's are more friendly BTW.

 

[Edwired]

the ram was at 1554mhz that at 155 bclk as it wasnt over the normal specs as it the corsair 1600mhz ram and yes it the x5675 i have

 

[masterdeejay]

I sold the chinese x99 rig, and i build a cheap budget 2x12 core dual cpu system.
only the half of the rams and the motherboard arrived yet. So now i use my motherboard tester cpu. (2620v3 was 14USD aliexpress)
The final setup will be:
Asus Z10PA-D8 (110 usd) ebay (cheaper than the chinese x99 dual socket motherboard and it support 8 channel memory!)
2x 2678v3 (24 cores 48 threads total, 3.3ghz all core hack) was 2x110 usd aliexpress
8x8gb ECC REG Hynix 1Rx4 DDR4 2133 (22usd/stick local store) this cost double than ddr3 ecc reg, but chinese dont make cheap dual 2011v3 with ddr3 so i must use ddr4 for this build
2x Hyper TX3 clone cooler (it dont have space for a Brocken3 cooler) cheap and it is fine for 120w TDP (from my old Dual 1366 system)
Asus Cerberus 1070Ti
5 port usb3 card (motherboard has to few ports)
256gb Samsung 860 and 480gb Kingston hyperX
Old Chieftech case from trash
Superflower platinum 750w (only the one cpu power conneted yet on the picture, but it has 2 so it is support the dual cpu system)

 

[Zyll Goliat]

I sold the chinese x99 rig, and i build a cheap budget 2x12 core dual cpu system.
only the half of the rams and the motherboard arrived yet. So now i use my motherboard tester cpu. (2620v3 was 14USD aliexpress)
The final setup will be:
Asus Z10PA-D8 (110 usd) ebay (cheaper than the chinese x99 dual socket motherboard and it support 8 channel memory!)
2x 2678v3 (24 cores 48 threads total, 3.3ghz all core hack) was 2x110 usd aliexpress
8x8gb ECC REG Hynix 1Rx4 DDR4 2133 (22usd/stick local store) this cost double than ddr3 ecc reg, but chinese dont make cheap dual 2011v3 with ddr3 so i must use ddr4 for this build
2x Hyper TX3 clone cooler (it dont have space for a Brocken3 cooler) cheap and it is fine for 120w TDP (from my old Dual 1366 system)
Asus Cerberus 1070Ti
5 port usb3 card (motherboard has to few ports)
256gb Samsung 860 and 480gb Kingston hyperX
Old Chieftech case from trash
Superflower platinum 750w (only the one cpu power conneted yet on the picture, but it has 2 so it is support the dual cpu system)
View attachment 153177

Nice.....I am eager to see your first benchmarks with that RIG.....

 

[Edwired]

I decided to take out the x5675 to see the ihs if it bow out or bow in using the straight metal ruler and light it appears that the ihs is bow inward so i ended up lapping the cpu the four corners were the high points just wanted to level out the core temps abit as core 2 is the lowest reading