• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Benchmarks Surface for AMD Ryzen 4700G, 4400G and 4200G Renoir APUs

Raevenlord

News Editor
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,755 (1.23/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Renowned leaker APISAK has digged up benchmarks for AMD's upcoming Ryzen 4700G, 4400G and 4200G Renoir APUs in 3D Mark. These are actually for the PRO versions of the APUs, but these tend to be directly comparable with AMD's non-PRO offerings, so we can look at them to get an idea of where AMD's 4000G series' performance lies. AMD's 4000G will be increasing core-counts almost across the board - the midrange 4400G now sports 6 cores and 12 threads, which is more than the previous generation Ryzen 5 3400G offered (4 cores / 8 threads), while the top-of-the-line 4700G doubles the 3400G's core-cpount to 8 physical and 16 logical threads.

This increase in CPU cores, of course, has implied a reduction in the area of the chip that's dedicated to the integrated Vega graphics GPU - compute units have been reduced from the 3400G's 11 down to 8 compute units on the Ryzen 7 4700G and 7 compute units on the 4400G - while the 4200G now makes do with just 6 Vega compute units. Clocks have been severely increased across the board to compensate the CU reduction, though - the aim is to achieve similar GPU performance using a smaller amount of semiconductor real-estate.





The 4700G's 8 Vega CUs clocked at 2.1 GHz, as reported by the benchmark suite, achieve 4,301 points in the graphics and 23,392 points in the CPU score, which are respectively 6.65% and 22.3% higher than the 4400G's 4,033 and 19,113 points (achieved with the same 8 Vega CUs clocked at a slower 1.9 GHz and with two fewer cores. The 4700G scores 20% and a whopping 70.6% higher than the 4200G's in the graphics and physics tests respectively - which makes sense, considering the slower-clocked 6 Vega CUs (1.7 GHz) and 4 core / 8 thread configuration of the former. AMD's 4000G series keeps the same 65 W TDp despite higher number of CPU cores and higher-clocked Vega cores, but the company will also have Ryzen 400=GE series which achieve a 35 W TDP, albeit at the cost of reduced CPU clocks (and likely GPU clocks as well).

_rogame, another well-known leaker, found two comparable system configurations running the Ryzen 4200G and 3200G, where the 4200G delivered 57% higher CPU performance, but 7% less GPU performance.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (2.75/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
it's not the Vega part,it's the 8 cu.
this is a very fast cpu paired with a gpu that'll let you run games at 1080p.
run,not play.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.61/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
You can pair them with up to 128 GB DDR4-5400 on select Gigabyte B550 boards.
Or dual channel memory bandwidth of around 80 GB/s which is not bad and you will be able to play select modern games.
 
Last edited:

Cheeseball

Not a Potato
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
2,039 (0.35/day)
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
System Name Titan
Processor AMD Ryzen™ 7 7950X3D
Motherboard ASRock X870 Taichi Lite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 EVO CPU
Memory TEAMGROUP T-Force Delta RGB 2x16GB DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB GDDR6 (MBA)
Storage Crucial T500 2TB x 3
Display(s) LG 32GS95UE-B, ASUS ROG Swift OLED (PG27AQDP), LG C4 42" (OLED42C4PUA)
Case Cooler Master QUBE 500 Flatpack Macaron
Audio Device(s) Kanto Audio YU2 and SUB8 Desktop Speakers and Subwoofer, Cloud Alpha Wireless
Power Supply Corsair SF1000
Mouse Logitech Pro Superlight 2 (White), G303 Shroud Edition
Keyboard Keychron K2 HE Wireless / 8BitDo Retro Mechanical Keyboard (N Edition) / NuPhy Air75 v2
VR HMD Meta Quest 3 512GB
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit 24H2 Build 26100.2605
A 4400G with an updated 11 CU iGPU would’ve been the perfect HTPC/lightweight gaming PC.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Messages
117 (0.06/day)
This is pointless, why would anyone "upgrade" to this if the gpu performance is similar to the previous generation
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
4,670 (2.61/day)
Location
Ex-usa | slava the trolls
This is pointless, why would anyone "upgrade" to this if the gpu performance is similar to the previous generation


CPU bottleneck removed by going Zen 2, which improves the overall performance ?
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
1,231 (0.36/day)
finally single chip integrated memory controller and ZEN2. should perform better than 10700K.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2014
Messages
14,170 (3.81/day)
Location
Sunshine Coast
System Name H7 Flow 2024
Processor AMD 5800X3D
Motherboard Asus X570 Tough Gaming
Cooling Custom liquid
Memory 32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s) Intel ARC A750
Storage Crucial P5 Plus 2TB.
Display(s) AOC 24" Freesync 1m.s. 75Hz
Mouse Lenovo
Keyboard Eweadn Mechanical
Software W11 Pro 64 bit
This is pointless, why would anyone "upgrade" to this if the gpu performance is similar to the previous generation
Same reason Intel users upgrade, more cores and faster clock speeds. You don't see them complain their iGPU can't play the latest games, because they don't use it for games.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Messages
117 (0.06/day)
People buy AMD APUs just so they can play games casually without buying discrete gpu. AMD can get away with not including iGPU at all in their processors, because those that buy them get a good graphics card anyway. But APU user expect decent gaming performance out of the box.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
7,563 (1.77/day)
This is pointless, why would anyone "upgrade" to this if the gpu performance is similar to the previous generation
What do you mean similar? It is definitively better than last gen, how much ~ well let's wait for the reviews!
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
1,761 (1.02/day)
The new Renoir APU is actually a compromise as compared to the last gen Picasso. While you get a significant boost in CPU even with the lowest end 4200G, you really lose a lot of graphic power comparing with the Ryzen 5 3400G. Till now, I am still not convinced that it is meaningful to pair the fastest 8CU iGPU with the top end Renoir unless it is cheap. iGPU are typically useful for budget gamers, or people that don't really need fast graphics (which kind of negates the benefit of the faster iGPU in this case). I believe Renoir is also like its predecessor, taking half of bandwidth from the PCI-E 3.0 x16 slot. So for those looking to get a dedicated graphics, this does not make sense.

What do you mean similar? It is definitively better than last gen, how much ~ well let's wait for the reviews!
I actually don't think its similar. Without looking at the top end Renoir, the 4 and 6 core Renoir APUs are likely to see no improvement, if not a regression in GPU performance. The reason why I excluded the top end Renoir is to compare graphics at around the same price point and since there wasn't any Ryzen 7 APUs in the past. CPU wise, there is no doubt the Renoir's Zen 2 will be significantly faster than the Zen+ though. So it really depends on what you are going to use the computer for.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2018
Messages
289 (0.11/day)
People buy AMD APUs just so they can play games casually without buying discrete gpu. AMD can get away with not including iGPU at all in their processors, because those that buy them get a good graphics card anyway. But APU user expect decent gaming performance out of the box.

I disagree. APUs and iGPU are more meant for office use and home use where games do not matter.
iGPU is there to just show something on the screen, not to play. Even tho amd and intel both try to cram better graphics from time to time, it is uselessly increasing cpu power consumption while achieving the similar results.
iGPU are also used for home server builds/NAS.

i've built a pc for my mom using a i5 2500, and it is doing its job just fine. She is playing games like candy crush and alike, no problem.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.41/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
A 4400G with an updated 11 CU iGPU would’ve been the perfect HTPC/lightweight gaming PC.
AMD APU's have so much potential (just look at the PS5 and Xbox), I'm frustrated they are not pushing the concept further. One of these paired with 16 CU's would be so sweet, for mobile or small form factor desktop gaming...
 
Joined
May 29, 2020
Messages
8 (0.00/day)
I think people are a bit tunnel visioned sadly.
Everything isn't gaming there's a lot of workloads out there and certainly AMD don't want to canibalise their low end GPUs either.
I think APUs are a good way to get people on a budget 'in' gaming, kind of getting their feet wet with the option to upgrade to a discrete GPU later on.

Personally I'm super stocked to get my hands on an APU equivalent to a 4900HS because I'll put it in a home server to run VMs, docker, etc without having to break the bank on new server hardware or use old ones that gulp down power (I want my power budget to be around 50W idle at the wall)
I also hope Asrock or someone updates the A300 with a motherboard that will support renoir APUs ..fingers crossed I guess
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.41/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
I think people are a bit tunnel visioned sadly.
Everything isn't gaming there's a lot of workloads out there and certainly AMD don't want to canibalise their low end GPUs either.
I think APUs are a good way to get people on a budget 'in' gaming, kind of getting their feet wet with the option to upgrade to a discrete GPU later on.
A 3TFlop APU would not cannibalize the 5500XT, but would allow basic FHD gaming.

And it's coming, by the way, especially in the laptop market, where it will eat from the geforce mx market share:
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,339 (3.91/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
Are we sure about the 8, 8, and 6 CU counts here? The mobile variants have very different CU counts - Ryzen 7 4700U only getting 7CUs and the baby Ryzen 3 4300U only getting 5CUs.

For the 4700G and even the 4400G to both get more CUs than the mobile variants seems odd, especially where the mobile variants with no way to upgrade to a dGPU later need it more.

I dunno, maybe the IGPs were thrown under the bus in the U-series for the sake of power targets, which is a tragedy because the graphics portion of an AMD APU is what made ultraportables competent at 3D work. If people wanted decent CPU performance and didn't give a damn about graphics, there was always a better Intel laptop option at 15W.

I may have to watch that in its entirety, despite that dude's offensively awful T-shirt.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.41/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
I disagree. APUs and iGPU are more meant for office use and home use where games do not matter.
You know that the PS5 and XBox both have AMD APUS inside with 10 to 12TFlops of graphic computer power? APU's are definitely not for office use only.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2017
Messages
184 (0.07/day)
System Name Linotosh
Processor Dual 800mhz G4
Cooling Air
Memory 1.5 GB
This is pointless, why would anyone "upgrade" to this if the gpu performance is similar to the previous generation
The 8 core is exactly the chip I want in an APU. Sufficient graphics to run multiple monitors for work and great CPU performance. Paired with the right motherboard, I can add a discreet GPU that will allow me to run VR. which is the main reason I'd upgrade the graphics. With the option to buy a zen 3 processor assuming I already have a discreet GPU, this is what I've been waiting for.
 
Joined
May 29, 2020
Messages
8 (0.00/day)
The 8 core is exactly the chip I want in an APU. Sufficient graphics to run multiple monitors for work and great CPU performance. Paired with the right motherboard, I can add a discreet GPU that will allow me to run VR. which is the main reason I'd upgrade the graphics. With the option to buy a zen 3 processor assuming I already have a discreet GPU, this is what I've been waiting for.
Exactly. I personally will use it as a home server that's always on, so likely go the route of the 4700GE.. jonesing for Asrock to make a A300 v2 for it :)
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
711 (0.10/day)
The main limiting factor for APU performance is memory bandwidth and not the CU count. DDR5 might help there but it will still be way less than current mid or high end graphic card.

PS4/5 and Xbox one * have way more memory bandwidth than any pc APU.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
697 (0.41/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
True, but for a 3 TFlop APU, access to 2GB of dual channel 3200MHz DDR4 should suffice.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,440 (1.42/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
The main limiting factor for APU performance is memory bandwidth and not the CU count. DDR5 might help there but it will still be way less than current mid or high end graphic card.

PS4/5 and Xbox one * have way more memory bandwidth than any pc APU.
I don't think you are correct and what you said is a bit of a stretch. CUs are just as important as memory bandwidth. You can't tell me that making the memory twice as fast would result in doubling the APU graphics performance? You would still need more CUs anyway to achieve that. It is more of a balance kinda thing then just memory bandwidth. Besides I'm sure there is no way that the APU will be able to pull of a high end graphics with 10 CU, only by increasing mem bandwidth to ridiculous speeds. You still need processing power anyway. Besides this APU = discrete graphics (even mid range) is not happening anytime soon or even ever.
Looking at a console side of things. You should not compare any console to a PC.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Messages
117 (0.06/day)
If it's not for gaming then why bother with boosting clocks. Then put some low power iGPU in it and sell it as regular CPU just like Intel does.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,440 (1.42/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 32GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
If it's not for gaming then why bother with boosting clocks. Then put some low power iGPU in it and sell it as regular CPU just like Intel does.
There is a lot of different API's or software that use GPU acceleration not being a game. Different resolutions (we are in 4k era and that requires some resources you know) Why everything has to be about games with you?
Why not low power iGPU? Because there's a demand for something with more kick.
 
Top