- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
- Messages
- 22,482 (6.03/day)
- Location
- The Washing Machine
System Name | Tiny the White Yeti |
---|---|
Processor | 7800X3D |
Motherboard | MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi |
Cooling | CPU: Thermalright Peerless Assassin / Case: Phanteks T30-120 x3 |
Memory | 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000 |
Video Card(s) | ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming |
Storage | Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB |
Display(s) | Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440) |
Case | Lian Li A3 mATX White |
Audio Device(s) | Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1 |
Power Supply | EVGA Supernova G2 750W |
Mouse | Steelseries Aerox 5 |
Keyboard | Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II |
VR HMD | HD 420 - Green Edition ;) |
Software | W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC |
Benchmark Scores | Over 9000 |
The costs are normally transferred to the consumers, anyways.
Halo products like Big Navi are very important in order to show to the consumers that the company can in reality make cutting-edge products, not just entry-level and mid-range. Halo is important to keep a recognisable brand reputation and awareness.
Also, it'd have very positive effect on the overall competitiveness and pricing structure. RX 5700 and RX 5700 XT were launched too expensive.
AMD should have launched the Navi 10 with proper voltage at 150-watt, and then build the product stack up and down as the wish.
Instead, there is just super duper expensive Navi 10 cards with crazy overclocks reaching staggering 250-300-watt TDP.
Competition but real one in order to keep the prices in check.
Seriously man just stop talking because every post you try to talk yourself out of your own BS is diggin a deeper hole. It happened with browsers, and its happening here. Why, I wonder... You can also just admit you don't know jack squat and start learning. This forum is full of people ready to educate. But when they do so, you stick to your ideas - with no basis.
Its not like the facade is working either.
At its core you're not wrong about halo product... but the learning point here is about yields and fabs, how they work and why they work like they do. Its great to understand that because chip size and all that are very strong bits of info to gauge what'll happen next, and why companies do what they do. Simple rule of thumb, no matter what news you read: the larger the die, the lower the yield. This in turn automatically, always means that smaller chips are far easier to make cost effectively. Big chips are extremely difficult to make without losing money, or pricing them out of this world. Examples everywhere. 2080ti; Turing pre Super even was expensive across the whole stack. Even the Supers are a result of better yields. That wasnt just lack of competition. It was a series of big dies with little to show for it. This is also why Navi 1st gen was pretty good for AMD. The die wasn't too big. And its why GCN was long overdue for a shrink or overhaul: dies got too large and competitor could do the same with smaller ones. The gap was even large enough that Nvidia could pull a Turing on 12nm and still come out winning.
Seems like the front exhaust will feed the rear fan with hot air. If the fans were on the same side then I guess the heat from the front exhaust would go directly to the CPU area..
View attachment 158066
As I see it, this card will exhaust much like a blower, likely having the usual ventilation holes at the outputs- end of the card, and possibly the opposite end? Like a double radial blower, kind of idea. That makes for two very short paths for air to go through and avoids any sort of turbulence from multiple directions of airflow. Just two separate chambers, really. Given the location of PCB, one of those fans is just there to cool heatsink and the other is blasting away over the die.
Both fans are definitely intakes.
Last edited: