- Joined
- Nov 25, 2020
- Messages
- 120 (0.08/day)
System Name | Howling_Fjord |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Xeon E5 2640 v3 @ 3398.39 MHz |
Motherboard | Huananzhi X99-F8 |
Cooling | Cooler Master MasterAir MA410P, Fans Corsair AF120 |
Memory | 16Gb (2x8) Micron Technology + 32Gb (2x16Gb) P/N: atermiter |
Video Card(s) | AMD Sapphire TOXIC R9 280X OC, EVGA GTX 1070 SC ACX 3.0 |
Storage | SSD NVMe 250Gb +NVMe 1Tb + 2x 2Tb HDD+ SSD 1TB KingDian +SSD 240Gb |
Display(s) | Samsung 7.2 inches (18.3 cm) / 1280 x 720 pixels @ 23-60 Hz |
Case | Mymax Full Tower Horus black |
Audio Device(s) | - |
Power Supply | Cougar Gx 800W 80Plus Gold |
Mouse | - |
Keyboard | - |
Software | Microsoft Windows 10 (10.0) Enterprise LTSB 64-bit |
Benchmark Scores | https://valid.x86.fr/h7nzby https://gpuscore.top/furmark/show.php?id=328097 |
man, i caught this information on the user's manual of his mobo, it clearly says that the M2_2 supports only PCIe 2.0 and M2_1 supports both PCIe and SATAYou're reading that wrong.
As I already mentioned, the primary slot is NVMe, the M2_2 slot is SATA
here is the link if you want to check it
yep, with that i agree, Sata m2 is just not worth it, regular Sata SSDs do the same job as good as the m.2 and it only takes a sata port instead of a m.2If it’s sata m2, then it’s just clutterless installation. If it’s nvme, then speed difference is huge.