Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[Annihilation]

5.0Ghz all cores

 

[AleXXX666]

Hi,
My little beast lol

View attachment 179539

Back times, i’ve had laptop with 1core celly 540, then upgraded it to pentium t3200, and then to c2d t8100 which slapped those-time new core i3 mobiles

4,3 GHz and the same score in multi like my i5 Haswell @ 2,2 GHz

Yeah old amd apus were surprisingly good in mc but they sucked in sc so windows use was pain in a$$ lol

View attachment 163130

Niice

View attachment 157482

Just one question.. HOW?!

Not sure if this effects all CPU's but on my 3570k I ran the new 1,92 version and scored 472, 1872, which seemed low.
I ran older 1.90 and get 486, 1912. That pretty big change.

Yes, they scale.

 

[phanbuey]

Not that much! at least 5.2 sure you can do!

Alriiiight, you've inspired me... 5.3 4 core @1.35v, with 5.0 all core 1.29v -- testing stability and adaptive settings now

edit -

5.3 6 core - 5.2 8core 5.0 all core:

 

[QuietBob]

OK, so you've seen the fastest from AMD. How about the slowest?

 

[phanbuey]

OK, so you've seen the fastest from AMD. How about the slowest?

View attachment 180936

That was my first gaming PC proc!

This overclocked on bus in an e-machines... and a pencil modded Radeon 9500 was my half life 2 rig . Only took like 43ish seconds to do 1m superpi

 

[AleXXX666]

That was my first gaming PC proc!

This overclocked on bus in an e-machines... and a pencil modded Radeon 9500 was my half life 2 rig . Only took like 43ish seconds to do 1m superpi

Maybe if i’m not mistaken this was system i’ve found layed around forgotten on abandoned warehouse and replaced my ooold pentium 4 with RDRAM lmfao
So it could have been “first hardware total upgrade” done 4 free lol

 

[StaticVapour]

Basic as it gets

 

[AleXXX666]

View attachment 180958View attachment 180959
Basic as it gets

Nice typewriter, interesting to compare this to my typo with G6400 lol

 

[AleXXX666]

View attachment 180958View attachment 180959
Basic as it gets

G6400 here, let's start the battle

 

[StaticVapour]

G6400 here, let's start the battle

Fair enough. Didn't bother finding the best voltage, just slapped +0.200V on it, it had some instability at 1.4V already, around 4.1Ghz last time I tested so I went over it

I did not run for long at that voltage, so no worries

 

[AleXXX666]

Fair enough. Didn't bother finding the best voltage, just slapped +0.200V on it, it had some instability at 1.4V already, around 4.1Ghz last time I tested so I went over it
View attachment 181484View attachment 181485
I did not run for long at that voltage, so no worries

Cool, i also noticed some 1.3+ volts for Athlon, lol

 

[storm-chaser]

Dual Socket Workstation from a bygone era.

 

[Toretobcn]

Fair enough. Didn't bother finding the best voltage, just slapped +0.200V on it, it had some instability at 1.4V already, around 4.1Ghz last time I tested so I went over it
View attachment 181484View attachment 181485
I did not run for long at that voltage, so no worries

View attachment 180888

Alriiiight, you've inspired me... 5.3 4 core @1.35v, with 5.0 all core 1.29v -- testing stability and adaptive settings now

edit -

5.3 6 core - 5.2 8core 5.0 all core:
View attachment 180889

good! so better! at least I stretch as much as I can! It seems that we have a good stick with the 11th and it does not look like we can approach its ipc or as a joke! axis

nor at 5.4ghz it seems that we will match that ipc!

 

[storm-chaser]

@Xx Tek Tip xX

Why are you laughing at this? Apparently, you are the only one. Nobody else but you find this funny, I'm just curious as to why.

 

[AleXXX666]

@Xx Tek Tip xX
View attachment 181731

Why are you laughing at this? Apparently, you are the only one. Nobody else but you find this funny, I'm just curious as to why.

He just knows his cpu can’t beat it in multi-core any chance...

 

[storm-chaser]

He just knows his cpu can’t beat it in multi-core any chance...

That's got to be it! We've got him sweating bullets

 

[Deleted member 178884]

He just knows his cpu can’t beat it in multi-core any chance...

That's got to be it! We've got him sweating bullets

Keep dreaming and check my CPU-Z valids ; )

But cool, you go daily your puny xeons in 2020 and I'll enjoy much faster things ; )

 

[the54thvoid]

This thread is for posting CPU-Z benchmarks. If people want to contribute, please do so. However, snarky comments and aggravating actions (be they emoji's, responses, or otherwise) will swiftly accumulate points. Benchmark threads are not pissing contests, nor are they meant to put others down.

This is the only warning I'll give before handing out reply-bans and points. If people cannot contribute in a meaningful manner, or if you feel this thread is not your cup of tea, don't post at all.

 

[CeasingEnd]

here's mine....I see some nice CPU and RAM OC's so I figured i'd post mine.

 

[jboydgolfer]

still rocking my 8600k. it runs all games & apps so well, i havent seen a need to upgrade for my purposes, despite 6 cores being a small number these days

 

[StaticVapour]

still rocking my 8600k. it runs all games & apps so well, i havent seen a need to upgrade for my purposes, despite 6 cores being a small number these days

As long as it does it's job well, it's retirement day is far far away

 

[Arctucas]

here's mine....I see some nice CPU and RAM OC's so I figured i'd post mine.

Really good scores, beats my 9900K at same frequencies (CPU & RAM) running 8 threads.

https://valid.x86.fr/c15205


W10 offline install, HT off:

Intel Core i9 9900K @ 5000 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[hxfrxb] Validated Dump by (2021-01-01 19:05:22) - MB: EVGA Corp. Z390 DARK - RAM: 32768 MB

valid.x86.fr

 

[AleXXX666]

Really good scores, beats my 9900K at same frequencies (CPU & RAM) running 8 threads.

https://valid.x86.fr/c15205


W10 offline install, HT off:

Intel Core i9 9900K @ 5000 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[hxfrxb] Validated Dump by (2021-01-01 19:05:22) - MB: EVGA Corp. Z390 DARK - RAM: 32768 MB

valid.x86.fr

9900k needs veery good AIO to not to throttle lol
It’s just fx9590 reborn by tdp

 

[CeasingEnd]

Really good scores, beats my 9900K at same frequencies (CPU & RAM) running 8 threads.

https://valid.x86.fr/c15205


W10 offline install, HT off:

Intel Core i9 9900K @ 5000 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[hxfrxb] Validated Dump by (2021-01-01 19:05:22) - MB: EVGA Corp. Z390 DARK - RAM: 32768 MB

valid.x86.fr

Wow that is impressive...I appreciate the response my friend. happy newyears to you....Looking at upgrading to x299 and a i9 9900x from a buddy. So I am looking forward to spending another 2 weeks tweaking until I can reach a max OC...idk why but I love doing this lol.

9900k needs veery good AIO to not to throttle lol
It’s just fx9590 reborn by tdp

I mean its a lot more than just that lol. Those fx series were some insanely hot chips that ate up some insane amounts of wattage for very mediocre performance....The 9th and 10th gen intels are far superior than most Ryzen chips in single and threaded instances and while new ryzen puts a hurtin on 9th and 10th gen intel those fx chips couldnt compete.....BUT I will be honest I never got to experience the 9590 I did have the 8350 8370 and 9370 and even after some intense overclocking they couldnt even get close to what my i7 pre OC. I was one of those that felt extremely let down by AMD during the FX days.....Thats what pushed me back to intel....and now that they got their SH** together I am extremely interested in the new gen ryzen 9 5950x with a 3080ti 3090 or even just possibly if I am lucky enough the 6900xt. All in all no disrespect intended by my comment my friend...I really do enjoy this type of discourse...so happy I joined this forum.

 

[Toretobcn]

Attentive guys there are first infos of the 11900k! and he comes warm going over 700 points in monocore