- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 3,011 (0.52/day)
- Location
- MN
System Name | Personal / HTPC |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5900x / Ryzen 5600X3D |
Motherboard | Asrock x570 Phantom Gaming 4 /ASRock B550 Phantom Gaming |
Cooling | Corsair H100i / bequiet! Pure Rock Slim 2 |
Memory | 32GB DDR4 3200 / 16GB DDR4 3200 |
Video Card(s) | EVGA XC3 Ultra RTX 3080Ti / EVGA RTX 3060 XC |
Storage | 500GB Pro 970, 250 GB SSD, 1TB & 500GB Western Digital / lots |
Display(s) | Dell - S3220DGF & S3222DGM 32" |
Case | CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo / CM HAF XB Evo |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech G35 headset |
Power Supply | 850W SeaSonic X Series / 750W SeaSonic X Series |
Mouse | Logitech G502 |
Keyboard | Black Microsoft Natural Elite Keyboard |
Software | Windows 10 Pro 64 / Windows 10 Pro 64 |
I am not hung up on anything. I just like the way ray tracing looks. So I think you need an attitude adjustment?
I made no comment about your attitude and I couldn't care less about it.
All I said is that it just strikes me as odd that folks want ray tracing aspects in GPUs when both sides are awful at it in it's current state.
Flip on ray tracing for Nvidia, even with their RT cores that are supposed to handle it, the overall impact is still massive. Same goes for AMD's card.
Then Nvidia wants you to enable DLSS to help alleviate the loss of FPS while at the same time sacrificing image quality so they can boast how much better at ray tracing they are over AMD.....bleh, they can keep their blurry upscaling software.
That's why I say right now, ray tracing is rather a moot point (a gimmick right now in its infancy) to weigh your decision making process on a GPU from either side. Give it another couple of generations before ray tracing becomes more of the norm (more games supporting it and more efficient hardware/software to render it). 2 or 3 generations from now is when the hardware and software for ray tracing will really start to solidify and that's when you should be concerned about how well a GPU make/model handles ray tracing.