• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Epic Games Files EU Antitrust Complaint Against Apple

This is tiresome, and still old news from last August just being hammered again because Epic aren't making progress in their lawsuits.

The appstore rules are black and white.
Epic violated them, plain and simple.

Apple does not have a monopoly on mobile gaming ecosystems, and their rules for the app store are similar to many rules set by Nintendo for their consoles. If Epic want to tap Apple's ecosystem, they need to abide by the rules set up by the ecosystem owners. That tappable market of customers didn't just spring into existence for the benefit of Epic Games, it was crafted over two decades and billions of USD of investment and reinvestment. Just because Tim Sweeney doesn't want to pay for that doesn't mean he's legally entitled to a slice of it. Competition law grants him the freedom to make his own phones or consoles and entice customers to use them instead of Apple or Nintendo, should he choose to do so.

Tim sweeny is just a spoilt billionaire who thinks he's above the law because he's a multi-billionaire. Screw him, and in a more general sense, screw Epic board members for some very consumer-unfriendly moves in the last half decade. Apple may be the bad guys but that doesn't mean that everyone fighting Apple is doing it for philanthropic reasons.
Not that I disagree with you..............but sometimes it's nice to see money coming back out of large corps.................albeit into the hands of lawyers ;)
 
Why isn't the EU fining Apple for only allowing Safari on their platforms?

Sound familiar? Hint EU vs Microsoft....
 
Why isn't the EU fining Apple for only allowing Safari on their platforms?

Sound familiar? Hint EU vs Microsoft....
Supposedly Apple isn't a monopoly like MS was, because it doesn't command a large market share. Go figure :wtf:
 
Nope. It's welcome to not touching iDevices for me.
I sideload on Android, too. The difference on Android at least is that Google gives you the option to sideload by default.
 
Supposedly Apple isn't a monopoly like MS was, because it doesn't command a large market share. Go figure :wtf:

To be honest, Apple isn't as large a monopoly as Microsoft was(is), when you consider mobile phones as a whole. Microsoft had(has) a much larger share of desktop/laptop devices than Apple does of mobile phones.

Technically, monopolies aren't illegal, they're only a problem when they abuse their leadership, and that are few to no viable alternatives.
 
To be honest, Apple isn't as large a monopoly as Microsoft was(is), when you consider mobile phones as a whole. Microsoft had(has) a much larger share of desktop/laptop devices than Apple does of mobile phones.

Technically, monopolies aren't illegal, they're only a problem when they abuse their leadership, and that are few to no viable alternatives.
True. But an abuse is an abuse regardless of whether you're a monopoly or not. I believe that's what is supposed to be investigated here.

I sideload on Android, too. The difference on Android at least is that Google gives you the option to sideload by default.
The difference is not "at least". Jailbreaking an iPhone voids your warranty.
That's why when I dabbled with development for mobile, I did it on Android: no $2000+ purchase required.
 
Back
Top