Share your CPUZ Benchmarks!

[CS85]

My new CPU

 

[storm-chaser]

My new CPU

View attachment 194775

so there is a slight improvement in IPC between my 9th gen i5 9600KF and your 11th gen i5 11500K... or so it would appear.

I will run my CPU at the same 4900MHz and see what I get. IIRC it's around 600 at that clock speed...

 

[CS85]

so there is a slight improvement in IPC between my 9th gen i5 9600KF and your 11th gen i5 11500K... or so it would appear.

I will run my CPU at the same 4900MHz and see what I get. IIRC it's around 600 at that clock speed...

Sounds good, yeah I heard it was up to 19% increase in IPC compared to last gen. 5GHz, not sure how stable it is though.

 

[storm-chaser]

Sounds good, yeah I heard it was up to 19% increase in IPC compared to last gen. 5GHz, not sure how stable it is though.View attachment 194777

Please let us know how far you can push it. Very curious about this CPU because it may very well be my next upgrade. Sucks I have to update the mainboard as well, but oh well. What kind of cooling and water block do you have on it?

 

[CS85]

Please let us know how far you can push it. Very curious about this CPU because it may very well be my next upgrade. Sucks I have to update the mainboard as well, but oh well. What kind of cooling and water block do you have on it?

So far seems like a solid CPU. No water cooling, I have a Noctua NH-D15 on it, temps are good, power consumption is quite high but nothing too bad. Will see if I can hit 5.1 at reasonable voltage and let you know. EDIT: seems like 5.1 is a no-go. Could do 5 with 1.36v but 5.1 will lock up at 1.4v. Not sure what the max safe vcore for Rocket Lake is.

 

[mclaren85]

Here are the results of my fresh Amd Ryzen 9 5950X build.

I have done no tweaking. PBO is set to auto.

How could that monster run with a so low voltage? Have you offset?

 

[Phabets70]

How could that monster run with a so low voltage? Have you offset?

No offset, all is on default except PBO which is set to Auto (technically an OC). I didn't even realize the low voltage. Now that I kept an eye on it I see it bumping to 1.2V when the CPU boosts to 5Ghz.

 

[Final_Fighter]

this is after setting settings 88 for PPT, 60 for TDC, and 90 for EDC. also going +200mhz. dont have curve optimizer in this bios and the latest causes the board not to boot so i have to run with it. stays under 1.4v when boosting and under 80c.

 

[WhitetailAni]

Nothing interesting on CPU tab for now (planning to OC tomorrow) but here's my Memory tab:

Spent 5 hours tuning this.
I've got a 2x8GB kit of Samsung B-Die at 3200 MT/s C14-14-14-31, and a Vengenance LPX kit at 3200 MT/s C16-18-18-36.
LPX has Nanya Tech RAM chips.

It passed half an hour of 1usmus' DRAM ClockTuner for Ryzen MEMbench memtest, and I'm planning to run memtest86 overnight to catch any errors.

 

[storm-chaser]

So this is after some fine tuning with turbo core overclocking (dynamic).
I have voltage set to auto and using multipliers:
x53
x53
x53
x52
x51
x50

These are the cpu z results with this configuration:

 

[jesdals]

Been playing around with memory timings and ended up here at normal room temps (21c)

 

[ezmafl]

Differences between an i7-11700K and my former i7-10700K:

I'm having BIOS issues with my Gigabyte Z490 board and currently waiting to try out a revision when available. However, I managed to get CPU-Z up and running with a few different combinations. While I don't have screen captures to represent all of the below, I saved most "validation submissions."

As expected, not much of a multicore difference between my i7-10700K at 5.0ghz and 5.1ghz compared to a stock i7-11700K.

Per CPU-Z, the i7-10700K stock scores were around ~560/~5600.

i7-10700K - 5.3 on 2 cores, 5.0 when running all cores (was my stable overclock):
Single - 623
Multi - 6160
https://valid.x86.fr/a8fex6

i7-10700K - 5.3 on 2 cores, 5.1 when running all cores (could never get stability without WHEA errors):
Single - 623
Multi - 6260

i7-11700K - 5.2 on 2 cores, 5.0 when running all cores:
Single - 703
Multi - 6942
(attached picture)

i7-11700K - 5.2 on 2 cores, 4.9 when running all cores:
Single - 702
Multi - 6821
https://valid.x86.fr/lzta4l

i7-11700K - 5.2 on 2 cores, 4.7 when running all cores:
Single - 701
Multi - 6532
https://valid.x86.fr/tx96iq

i7-11700K - Stock
Single - 670
Multi - 6381
https://valid.x86.fr/k68ul8

 

[ezmafl]

Ended up returning the i7-11700K; I believe the CPU was either faulty or there were BIOS compatibility issues with my Gigabyte Z490 board. The RKL CPU would frequently (but briefly) read 0c on its thermal sensors, plus the fact I couldn't get a stable OC. Anyway, I replaced it with an i9-10850K. Other than adjusting voltage, I bumped the lower end turbo ratios from 48x to 49x (all core); leaving the max single ratio "stock" at 52x. Will eventually try and see if I can get 50x all core when I have the time.

 

[Toretobcn]

Ended up returning the i7-11700K; I believe the CPU was either faulty or there were BIOS compatibility issues with my Gigabyte Z490 board. The RKL CPU would frequently (but briefly) read 0c on its thermal sensors, plus the fact I couldn't get a stable OC. Anyway, I replaced it with an i9-10850K. Other than adjusting voltage, I bumped the lower end turbo ratios from 48x to 49x (all core); leaving the max single ratio "stock" at 52x. Will eventually try and see if I can get 50x all core when I have the time.

what a mess you seemed happy with the scores ...

 

[ezmafl]

^-- Yeah, was a mess. I would have tried a different RKL chip if they had them in store, but couldn't be without a computer for a few days. Happy with the i9-10850K; it put me back on track single thread wise compared to my i7-10700K. Also ahead of the i7-11700K even OC'ed due to the additional cores. It's a trade-off though.

Slight tweak to my 52x set to 3 cores (versus 2) with 49x on the remaining cores. The extra 52x helped boost the single thread from 601 to 621. Seem to have good stability along with good temps. I'm content with these settings (at least for a little while)!

 

[QuietBob]

Ever wondered how fast the CPU inside your PS4 is?

The console has two such modules. But even that is small comfort, seeing how everything is bottlenecked by the abysmal ST performance. And the Xbox One does no better at 1.75 GHz

 

[freeagent]

My little 5600X @ +200 -30

 

[dont whant to set it"']

Pretty much what same ST score here giving CO a try with -15 did not yeld WHEA's in half a day so I bumped it to -30 all-core with no errors in the two weeks since , well there were errors ironed out to dram timings and what not.

 

[freeagent]

 

[dont whant to set it"']

Show 'em boy'o ! Show them how it's done as the new ones on their 7nm can't hold a candle to your 130nm displacement. A lower score is better in this case , right ? , No ? , Ok.

 

[QuietBob]

A lower score is better in this case , right ?

Yep, it means your CPU has lower latency. Therefore it is faster
Just look at my proud Sempron!

 

[dont whant to set it"']

@QuietBob mine's overclocked and at it's max multi , don't know about yours as it's frequency seems low to the point of a decreased multiplier?(to lazy at the moment to Google the specs of a 2500+ 90nm Sempron).

 

[Simkin]

Intel i7-5960X @ 4.6Ghz (32GB 3200Mhz CL14) Multi: 5009, Single: 505
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G @ Stock (8 Core Zen 2 APU) (16GB 3600Mhz CL16) Multi: 5650, Single: 530

So, seems like my Ryzen HTPC is faster than my Gamer/Workstation

Cant wait for Alder Lake-S this fall.

 

[GerKNG]

5800X @ 95W

(95/60/90), 1X Scalar, Curve Optimizer -15 all Core, +50Mhz offset.

 

[GrevenX]

651 Single
5166 Multi

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X @ 4773.89 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR

[07eey2] Validated Dump by DESKTOP-PHJTP6B (2021-06-21 13:14:22) - MB: Asus PRIME X570-PRO - RAM: 16384 MB

valid.x86.fr