Warzone fps increase with Ryzen 9 5900HX / 3070 130W laptop

[crypto5]

thanks for sharing the results. I'm going to upgrade the ram to 32g as well!

 

[Triton.se]

OK, Season 3 is here with 80's version of the map, but I was more interested in DLSS. Tested briefly and didn't like what I saw, even DLSS Quality looked blurry, got 141 fps in the first round. 2nd round I disabled DLSS and visited same areas (near Downtown) and got 145 fps with more clarity, still there is a yellowish tint to the image I kinda still think is a blur/smear LOL . Both runs gave really great GPU usage, 95.5% but GPU power was lower than the usual ~112W, 108W in S03. All with RWC=5, 2x16GB, normal settings, internal monitor. 3rd run was with RWC=4 and 133 Render Resolution, giving closest to 1440p rez: could say it's 99% GPU usage, but still "only" 116 W, could imagine 125W from 99% usage. Balcony door and a window open, fans at max, GPU 66C

EDIT: 4th run was same as 3rd run but with RWC=6...it was a short run but FPS was the same, CPU watts increased some, GPU watts lowered some, BUT: I felt input/mouse lag!

 

[Triton.se]

Wow ! Connected the external monitor and ran Warzone, ~17 fps more (~12%) than with internal monitor, first time I've seen this on regular BR

 

[Triton.se]

I tested 133 Render resoultion on 1080p again, should be the same as 1440p and 100 Render resolution.
All the same settings as two post above (2x16GB, normal settings, hwacc etc) but with External monitor and+150/+300 overclock on GPU:

13 fps more (nearly 11%) - a 20 minute run

 

[Triton.se]

So I installed the original 2x8GB RAM and wanted to compare them with 2x16GB, also with and without external monitor, took me hours and Warzone was patched like 5 times, from old to new, to old, to new... but I think all the short runs were with the newer patch.

West Downtown area, close to Stadium, from this location it takes 18 seconds to run to the roundabout. I aim, don't move mouse after that, press H once to run continiously.

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T - AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, RTX 3070 8GB 115+15W (stock clocks, my normal graphics settings in Warzone, DLSS disabled)

2x8GB original memory, internal monitor: 117.5 FPS (100%)
2x8GB original memory, external monitor: 136.1 FPS (116%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 138.1 FPS (118%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 144.3 FPS (123%) rerun with RendererWorkerCount = 5 and disabled hardware accelerating GPU, stock clocks, high GPU usage, 96-97%
2x16GB RipJaws memory, external monitor: 162.2 FPS (138%) avg FPS was inconsistent, were 150, 154, 156, 161 and best run was 162 FPS, for that I disabled hardware accelerated GPU in Windows Games and used RWC=5

Before each test I did CPU and Memory benches to check all were performing well (AIDA64 Extreme CPU Queen and Memory Latency in particular, but also CPU-Z bench as well as CINEBENCH R20 Multi)
Many times scores were lower than expected, then I shut down and let laptop cool a while. I had only +16C on the table and +9-10C on the floor

With 2x8GB original memory and internal monitor the CPU Time (displayed by Warzone) was high, 9ms when GPU Time was 6ms.
The two tests after were CPU Time 7ms and GPU Time 6ms.
Last test showed a balanced 6ms on both. EDIT // Added another run with 2x16GB and internal monitor

BTW: If you're gonna swap memory, do it with only internal monitor connected. When I had swapped from 2x8GB to 2x16GB none of the monitors showed image. I had to put back 2x8GB again to get image, then deselect external monitor (Fn+F9) , and swap mem after that.

 

[Rhegion]

So I installed the original 2x8GB RAM and wanted to compare them with 2x16GB, also with and without external monitor, took me hours and Warzone was patched like 5 times, from old to new, to old, to new... but I think all the short runs were with the newer patch.

West Downtown area, close to Stadium, from this location it takes 18 seconds to run to the roundabout. I aim, don't move mouse after that, press H once to run continiously.

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QR-HG022T - AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, RTX 3070 8GB 115+15W (stock clocks, my normal graphics settings in Warzone, DLSS disabled)

2x8GB original memory, internal monitor: 117.5 FPS (100%)
2x8GB original memory, external monitor: 136.1 FPS (116%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 138.1 FPS (118%)
2x16GB RipJaws memory, internal monitor: 144.3 FPS (123%) rerun with RendererWorkerCount = 5 and disabled hardware accelerating GPU, stock clocks, high GPU usage, 96-97%
2x16GB RipJaws memory, external monitor: 162.2 FPS (138%) avg FPS was inconsistent, were 150, 154, 156, 161 and best run was 162 FPS, for that I disabled hardware accelerated GPU in Windows Games and used RWC=5

Before each test I did CPU and Memory benches to check all were performing well (AIDA64 Extreme CPU Queen and Memory Latency in particular, but also CPU-Z bench as well as CINEBENCH R20 Multi)
Many times scores were lower than expected, then I shut down and let laptop cool a while. I had only +16C on the table and +9-10C on the floor

With 2x8GB original memory and internal monitor the CPU Time (displayed by Warzone) was high, 9ms when GPU Time was 6ms.
The two tests after were CPU Time 7ms and GPU Time 6ms.
Last test showed a balanced 6ms on both. EDIT // Added another run with 2x16GB and internal monitor

BTW: If you're gonna swap memory, do it with only internal monitor connected. When I had swapped from 2x8GB to 2x16GB none of the monitors showed image. I had to put back 2x8GB again to get image, then deselect external monitor (Fn+F9) , and swap mem after that.

Hi Triton.se, I follow your advise, but with the same specs (only 16gb single rank ram) I've very different performance, I use manual mode in armoury crate.

My fps never go further 100...why?

Thanks

 

[Adamdan]

I know this is a very old post but I’m wondering if you have tried warzone 2.0? I’m getting very off fps. Sometimes I’m at 110-130 at max setting dlss quality at 1600p then other days I’ll fire it up and I’ll be at 70fps. Sometimes I’ll be sitting at the menu and my fps will be low then jump back up to 140fps and then it will play fine for hours. I hope it’s just a driver update.