I mean part of that is just inflation. $500 in 2010 is not the same as $500 today. That's hardly nvidia's fault, especially with the high price of modern process nodes.
The titan was ludicrous, as is the 3090, but that's hardly a surprise, back in the day we had silly expensive dual GPUs like the Mars III instead. The 580 today would be a $607 card, so yes the $700 for a 3080 is a bit steep, but OTOH process node price increases would likely explain much of the difference.
I just dont see the issue with MSRP pricing. Real world pricing is another issue entirely....
Sure, that's why I said adjusted for inflation. Maybe you missed it, no biggie.
You could well be right that these single top end GPUs replacing the price point of dual GPUs, I hadn't thought of that. It still amounts to the same thing though, that I can't buy a top end single GPU card without spending insane money and that really does tick me off.
Leaving aside covid, silicon shortages and other allegedly "temporary" factors, I'm not convinced that the modern process nodes would add all that much to the price, if at all. If anyone's got an expert opinion on this one, I'm happy to be corrected though.
Multi GPU is pretty much dead at this point, thats why Nvidia and AMD is pushing 1000 dollars top-end GPU's with large dies and tons of VRAM
It's not something you need anyway. They are aimed at 4K/5K+ gaming. Most people should focus on 1440p and ~120 fps which have never been easier to optain. 4K/60 fps is pretty easy too.
Why do people INSIST on getting the absolute best when you can't afford one? Do you drive a Ferrari too, or do you simply buy a regular car to get from A to B?
My point is that I could get the absolute best single GPU card just a decade ago without breaking the bank (see my post about the GTX 580 from a decade ago (time flies)) a few posts up. I was able to get the top end 780 Ti in 2014, but I've since then had to settle for second best, the GTX 1080 and RTX 2080 SUPER, but the pricing trend is still increasing, so it seems to me that it's quite likely that by the time GPU availability returns to some semblance of normality again, I'll only be able to afford a midrange card and that sucks. We can analyse all the reasons why this is happening and can make for interesting conversation, but the bottom line is that I'm prevented from getting the card I want due to inflated pricing and that ticks me off. I'm not being unreasonable, either.
So, your point doesn't really stand scrutiny and it's also not for you or me to say what resolution and framerate someone should be gaming at.
This is like the most unenthusiastic flagship Ti launch ever. We all know it's going to be as rare as astatine.
What's astatine? Oh, hang on, point made beautifully!