• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,693 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Formula is built using AMD's new Navi 21 XTXH chip, which runs much higher clocks than what the regular RX 6900 XT can achieve. In our testing, this is the first AMD card in a long time to beat NVIDIA's current-generation flagship, the RTX 3090.

Show full review
 

the54thvoid

Super Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,987 (2.39/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
That's a ridiculous level of performance. But it's not that great, given it's 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti. Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force. I know lots of people dont give a crap about energy efficiency, but it is the future of technology. So, in a way, this is a step backwards, just like the 3090. I'm happy to miss this generation.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
1,700 (0.27/day)
@W1zzard how to get a copy of GPU-Z 2.38.3 that you are using to detect the 6900XTXH? Current 2.38.0 does not detect my Red Devil XTXH and I wanted to compare, please? (I did submit a copy of the 6900 XTXH Red Devil to the DB, as an FYI)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,927 (0.44/day)
Location
UK
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
VRM looks like 14+2 Vcore and SOC. With 3+2 Vmem and VDDCI to me. Just judging by the splits in the power planes in the pictures.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,350 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
That's a ridiculous level of performance. But it's not that great, given it's 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti. Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force. I know lots of people dont give a crap about energy efficiency, but it is the future of technology. So, in a way, this is a step backwards, just like the 3090. I'm happy to miss this generation.

I don't see the problem, nor is it a step back as it is 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti but it is also 50% faster, efficiency remains the same. AMD was not there when the 2080 ti was released Nvidia was. Now AMD has caught up and Nvidia is still in the same place, I don't understand how you can reason that it isn't progress on AMD's part. I don't see an argument against, if someone has a ti or any nvidia card and wants a larger performance envelope, it's a side-grade efficiency wise but a large bump perf, if that person owns a prior gen AMD card, it's a bump in both metrics.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
58 (0.03/day)
Progress is meant to bring efficiency
Look one more time @page 35 and find out who's capping the consumer GPU perf/watt ATM
On a side note, a TUF 1650 Super I've bought for 150 bucks in october was a 'hooo lala' for a mid tier rig with a cheap PSU and electricity concerns

One good thing you do is skipping one heck of expensive GPUs lineup! Any acquisition lead to further price hikes so...:peace:
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,350 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
Look one more time @page 35 and find out who's capping the consumer GPU perf/watt ATM
On a side note, a TUF 1650 Super I've bought for 150 bucks in october was a 'hooo lala' for a mid tier rig with a cheap PSU and electricity concerns

One good thing you do is skipping one heck of expensive GPUs lineup! Any acquisition lead to further price hikes so...:peace:

He's clearly saying that not enough. From what I understand, he wants it to sip a level of power similar to that of a 2080ti while offering the current amount of performance. Which is unrealistic considering not much has changed technology wise since the 2080 ti to warrant such gains.
 
Joined
Jun 10, 2014
Messages
820 (0.22/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Proper
Processor 5900X + OC
Motherboard GB X570s Elite AX
Cooling WC Heatkiller 3.0 LT
Memory G.Skill 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070 Ti Trinity LC'ed + OC
Storage KC2500 1TB + A2000 1TB
Display(s) GB M32Q
Case Fractal Define R6 USB C
Audio Device(s) Creative AE-7 + Phonic AM120 MkIII + H/K AVR 265 -> Paradigm Monitor 11 v.7 + AKG K712 Pro
Power Supply Seasonic Prime PX-850
Mouse Log G502 X LS
Keyboard Keychron K5 Opt.brown
Software Win10 Pro
Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force.
"Should be" and "is" are as far apart from each other in GPU market as possible. Just check how high-end GPU coolers looked 15 years ago - small heatsink with 40mm fan installed. Each generation of GPU brings more efficiency, but also raw power increase over the said efficiency gains, that's why we ended up with chungus cards right now.
 
Joined
Apr 19, 2017
Messages
71 (0.03/day)
Very good review. Really nice card. I'm really impressed. Expensive as all hell like everything else. Would like to see this compared to the other XTX models. Hope you get all of them to test.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,184 (3.93/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
That's a ridiculous level of performance. But it's not that great, given it's 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti. Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force. I know lots of people dont give a crap about energy efficiency, but it is the future of technology. So, in a way, this is a step backwards, just like the 3090. I'm happy to miss this generation.
AMD loves to ignore power efficiency and overvolt/overclock everything by default. You certainly won't find efficiency in a factory OC version of a product whose stock version is already so far beyond the efficiency sweet spot on the clock/voltage curve!

Undervolt this and you'll likely see what you're looking for, but this isn't the version you should be undervolting because it's designed from the ground up to handle 400W. if you really want the most efficiency AMD has to offer, you need to get the reference 6900XT and undervolt it to 0.95V or so, which will net you the performance of a good factory-OC 6800XT but at around 180W; Those last 200MHz cost well over 100W.
 
Last edited:

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,147 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Fast card but wow the heat, power consumption and price to get those last few % !! 391w gaming and 600+w spikes, and a nuclear hole in your wallet, yikes.

Still, good on you AMD for making the darn thing in the first place, because why not I guess.
 
Joined
Sep 20, 2018
Messages
1,451 (0.65/day)
That's a ridiculous level of performance. But it's not that great, given it's 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti. Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force. I know lots of people dont give a crap about energy efficiency, but it is the future of technology. So, in a way, this is a step backwards, just like the 3090. I'm happy to miss this generation.
Ever since ray tracing was brought up, enregy efficieny has taken a step backwards, the reason why 3080 is faster than a 2080Ti is because it consumes more power. now 350w consumer GPUs are becoming mainstream which further increases the size and weight of the coolers and PSU requirements, it was this gen that we started to see 4 slot coolers and that tells you something.

"Should be" and "is" are as far apart from each other in GPU market as possible. Just check how high-end GPU coolers looked 15 years ago - small heatsink with 40mm fan installed. Each generation of GPU brings more efficiency, but also raw power increase over the said efficiency gains, that's why we ended up with chungus cards right now.
And that is very bad, when triple slot coolers started to be common, motherboard vendors made metal reinforced PCIe slots, now we see GPUs that come with support brackets in their box, there should be a limit, otherwise this ridiculousness wont stop

AMD loves to ignore power efficiency and overvolt/overclock everything by default. You certainly won't find efficiency in a factory OC version of a product whose stock version is already so far beyond the efficiency sweet spot on the clock/voltage curve!
I believe the only reason AMD managed to catch up to Nvidia in efficiency this gen, is because Nvidia have not made that much improvements in power efficiency since RTX 2000 series, all there R&D efforts have gone to RT cores and Tensore cores, however gaming performance for watt have been not so much improved, and what they did instead, increased power draw from 250w to 350w.

Fast card but wow the heat, power consumption and price to get those last few % !! 391w gaming and 600+w spikes, and a nuclear hole in your wallet, yikes.

Still, good on you AMD for making the darn thing in the first place, because why not I guess.
yeah, all of us who said, 650w were good enough for single GPU high end systems look like fools right now, but some of the blame goes to AMD and mostly Nvidia, for not making the generational improvements in efficiency that we'v come to expect
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,147 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
all of us who said, 650w were good enough for single GPU high end systems look like fools right now
I've had a 3080 since launch day, using a Corsair SF600 Gold PSU with no issues whatsoever, the whole system has never pulled >500w from the wall, and as you can see from the charts in this review the consumption and spikes are much more manageable on a 3080. The 3090 and even more so the 6900XT tho ... dayum.

Of course with Ampere and RDNA2 to some extent too, undervolting is always an option to pump up efficiency and lower overall consumption, but that is definitely not the point of the card in this review.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,350 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
yeah, all of us who said, 650w were good enough for single GPU high end systems look like fools right now, but some of the blame goes to AMD and mostly Nvidia, for not making the generational improvements in efficiency that we'v come to expect

Is it blame if the expectations are unreasonable?
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,652 (0.79/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
That's a ridiculous level of performance. But it's not that great, given it's 50% more power hungry than a 2080ti. Progress is meant to bring efficiency, not brute force. I know lots of people dont give a crap about energy efficiency, but it is the future of technology. So, in a way, this is a step backwards, just like the 3090. I'm happy to miss this generation.


If you want energy efficiency, buy an Rx6800 Non-XT, or under-volt your $3000 GPU.
Just by checking the TPU chart there you can clearly spot the efficiency winner.

Top of the line GPUs are always expected to throw efficiency out of the window to squeeze out the last bit of performance.
 
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
8,184 (3.93/day)
System Name Bragging Rights
Processor Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz
Motherboard It has no markings but it's green
Cooling No, it's a 2.2W processor
Memory 2GB DDR3L-1333
Video Card(s) Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz)
Storage 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3
Display(s) 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz
Case Veddha T2
Audio Device(s) Apparently, yes
Power Supply Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger
Mouse MX Anywhere 2
Keyboard Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all)
VR HMD Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though....
Software W10 21H1, barely
Benchmark Scores I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000.
I believe the only reason AMD managed to catch up to Nvidia in efficiency this gen, is because Nvidia have not made that much improvements in power efficiency since RTX 2000 series, all there R&D efforts have gone to RT cores and Tensore cores, however gaming performance for watt have been not so much improved, and what they did instead, increased power draw from 250w to 350w.
We won't know for sure until AMD and Nvidia use the same foundry again, but it looks like a lot of the blame for Ampere's silly power draw is on Samsung.

Extrapolating clockspeeds, voltages, and transistor count from the RTX-2000 series, if Ampere was made on TSMC 7nm it would most likely use at least 20% less power.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,652 (0.79/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
Joined
Nov 20, 2015
Messages
68 (0.02/day)
kinda pity it isn't called Navi XDXD, a laughing face for nvidia and current price absurdity.
 
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Messages
181 (0.05/day)
Very happy to see Asrock bringing back their OC-Formulas to life, this 6900XT does not dissapoint!
It's crazy price indeed, but these cards also not meant for the normal people :D
I wonder what's the bios setting for their GPU alone, 320W?
 
Joined
Feb 10, 2020
Messages
179 (0.10/day)
Thanks for another very detailed and well written review :)

Also great to see how it performs. Would be awesome to see it in a "normal market" where prices are only dictated by msrp & "what's hot" and not the craziness we have right now, but can't change that sadly.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2015
Messages
284 (0.09/day)
"Overclocking requires power limit increase"

So has every single nvidia card since 2017 and AMD as well. Please make sure to add this to nvidia card reviews as well.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Messages
58 (0.03/day)
He's clearly saying that not enough. From what I understand, he wants it to sip a level of power similar to that of a 2080ti while offering the current amount of performance. Which is unrealistic considering not much has changed technology wise since the 2080 ti to warrant such gains.
It seems like efficiency wasn't the purpose of this specific model, hence the 'OC Formula' naming scheme. The chart puts the original 6900XT ahead of AIBs and this have been a thing since forever for OC/maxed out versions, am I right ? I'd except that level of efficiency (2080Ti for future flagship GPUs) in the 2022-2024 consoles (Pro's for PS or actually refreshing this odd generation for both XO & PS) or 2024-2026 GPUs. Till then, don't buy some 800-1200W PSU for these beta monsters of computing...
It's the same principle you see in tuned cars -> you do it for sucking up the last drop of potential performance, while neglecting power consumption and additional needs/consumables required to work it out. You can't call out for Toyota Prius' fuel efficiency @SSC Tuatara. This card was clearly made for beatin' 3090's rasterization performance at any resolution, and my guess is it's gonna do it at 8k too over time, as new drivers will be squeezing it even tighter.
 
Top