the number of programs and games in common use that will utilize 32GB are still in the minority,
The word "needs" is relative.
Yeah, "will utilize" and "needs" are quite different.
But I think being overlooked in this discussion is the fact programs (which of course, includes the OS) really use a computer's virtual memory (RAM + PF). Not just RAM alone - even when gobs of RAM is installed. This is why the PF should never be disabled.
Then of course, there's the issue of the number of programs (including open tabs, instances of the same program, etc.) running at once.
Some games benefit greatly from having more than 16GB.
I think Lex illustrates a major distinction here - though this is certainly not limited to "games". "Benefit greatly" is very subjective in some cases, critically essential in others.
IDK - just thinking out loud...
In a "game" (defined as a form of play and entertainment, that is
NOT life or death), "greatly benefits", "needs" and "can utilize" simply suggests more "fun". Hardly serious.
In the guidance system of a missile traveling at Mach-3 (2,300MPH), "greatly benefits" suggests success or failure in a life or death scenario. Couldn't be more serious.
Frankly, I am not aware of any programs that "needs" 32GB
to run. That is, it will fail to run if less RAM is installed. Many will (
always along with the OS) utilize 32GB or even more. Some
may "benefit" with 32GB compared to less.
Just something to ponder.