Tatty_Two
Gone Fishing
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 25,962 (3.73/day)
- Location
- Worcestershire, UK
Processor | Intel Core i9 11900KF @ -.080mV PL max @220w |
---|---|
Motherboard | MSI MAG Z490 TOMAHAWK |
Cooling | DeepCool LS520SE Liquid + 3 Phanteks 140mm case fans |
Memory | 32GB (4 x 8GB SR) Patriot Viper Steel Bdie @ 3600Mhz CL14 1.45v Gear 1 |
Video Card(s) | Asus Dual RTX 4070 OC + 8% PL |
Storage | WD Blue SN550 1TB M.2 NVME//Crucial MX500 500GB SSD (OS) |
Display(s) | AOC Q2781PQ 27 inch Ultra Slim 2560 x 1440 IPS |
Case | Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard Realtek ALC1200/SPDIF to Sony AVR @ 5.1 |
Power Supply | Seasonic CORE GM650w Gold Semi modular |
Software | Win 11 Home x64 |
Yup, to be clear, I am not happy with it at all, for it to work (force reduction) there has to be a balance between strength, technology and capability, I feel we have lost that balance with regard to strength and like anything in life, once it's gone it won't be coming back .......... until the next huge conflict by which time it is likely too late.That has got to be one of the most disarming and diplomatic things I've ever read(that's a compliment). Well said!
EDIT, sorry about that. No offense was intended.
Ironically, just before the Falklands the Royal Marines were set to lose over 50% of their force strength along with a large part of the Amphibious assault fleet, it is of no surprise that those planned cuts were dismissed after that conflict.