• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Lightelligence's Optical Processor Outperforms GPUs by 100 Times in Some of The Hardest Math Problems

Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
28,260 (6.74/day)
I wish mining would stop creeping into threads it does not belong in...
While I would normally agree, in this case, the context is valid. If these optical processors can be utilized for cryptocoin mining, it would be very attractive and beneficial for everyone. The mere prospect of such is an exciting possibility! Do you not agree?
How so? This doesn't do any kind of meaningful data hash that I can see.
Do you not think it could be easily adapted? Given what's been stated, I think it would be trivial to recompile mining code to run on such a processor.

In my eyes, this development is the way forward for computing long term. Optical CPU/GPU/APU would not suffer from heat and power consumption like traditional silicon based IC's do. Very exciting indeed!

but can it play Crysis?
While it is clear you say that in jest, I suggest that with the code properly complied and optimized, such a processor would likely be able to run dozens of instances of Crysis simultaneously.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,505 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
There are thousands fields of science and engineering alone that would massively benefit from hardware that could solve certain classes of problems a 100x faster. They specifically don't use general purpose hardware for everything because they are too slow. The article specifically mentions "NP-complete class of problems". There are exist many such problems that have no efficient algorithms at all to solve them. These problems run in superpolynomial time which can be exponentially or factorially slow.
I fail to see what any of that has anything to do with what I said. The matter of the fact is "100 times faster than a GPU" is still a meaningless statement.

The article specifically mentions "NP-complete class of problems". There are exist many such problems that have no efficient algorithms at all to solve them. These problems run in superpolynomial time which can be exponentially or factorially slow.

It doesn't matter how fast the hardware is, those problems always remain prohibitively expensive to be put into practice.

Does it matter if you only need it to do one thing?

No, but it's still dumb to make that comparison. I am sure that there are bits of silicon in a phone's SoC that compute specific things much faster than a GPU, that still doesn't mean anything in particular.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,355 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
No, but it's still dumb to make that comparison. I am sure that there are bits of silicon in a phone's SoC that compute specific things much faster than a GPU, that still doesn't mean anything in particular.

In a resource limited scenario such as a phone, you're wrong that it doesn't matter because speed directly translates to a lower energy consumption. Hypothetically could that be the difference between 8h or 24h of battery life for that phone.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
9,505 (3.27/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
In a resource limited scenario such as a phone, you're wrong that it doesn't matter because speed directly translates to a lower energy consumption. Hypothetically could that be the difference between 8h or 24h of battery life for that phone.

I don't know if you guys can't or don't want to understand what I am saying.

Comparing them is meaningless, when one says something is X times better than a GPU I expect it to be better at everything since that's a generic statement.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,355 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
I don't know if you guys can't or don't want to understand what I am saying.

Comparing them is meaningless, when one says something is X times better than a GPU I expect it to be better at everything since that's a generic statement.

That not the statement being made here. The statement is "something is X times better than a GPU at Y applications."
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
12,014 (1.72/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs, 24TB Enterprise drives
Display(s) 55" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
That not the statement being made here. The statement is "something is X times better than a GPU at Y applications."
Since it cannot store data without exchanging photons for electron/electron potential the supporting hardware is going to be next to impossible to make faster than existing custom ASIC's for whatever code they threw at it or however they twisted the testing to attain the result they wanted. I want to see their testing methodology and descriptions, cause after reading up on it more it seems like a really fast photon sorting device that still requires the silicon hardware to make work. The only real speed up is the speed of light through optically transparent material VS the speed of EM propogation through copper and other metals used in current semiconductors.

Essentially they need to learn to trap light in a bottle to make this work any faster in real world applications.
 
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
21,542 (3.40/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 9950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE Aorus Elite X670 AX
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory 64GB (4x 16GB) G.Skill Flare X5 @ DDR5-6000 CL30
Video Card(s) XFX RX 7900 XTX Speedster Merc 310
Storage Intel 905p Optane 960GB boot, +2x Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) TOSLINK->Schiit Modi MB->Asgard 2 DAC Amp->AKG Pro K712 Headphones or HDMI->B9 OLED
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti Pro 850W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeed Wireless
Keyboard WASD Code v3 with Cherry Green keyswitches + PBT DS keycaps
Software Gentoo Linux x64 / Windows 11 Enterprise IoT 2024
Do you not think it could be easily adapted? Given what's been stated, I think it would be trivial to recompile mining code to run on such a processor
not really, no. PoW mining relies on a hash function of some kind and as far as I can tell, this lacks any.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
13,843 (3.95/day)
Processor Intel i5-12600k
Motherboard Asus H670 TUF
Cooling Arctic Freezer 34
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500
Display(s) Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Can they make a processor which will crash the crypto market by making it too easy to produce coin?
No.
Crypto is increasingly harder to mine the more you mine it. By design. No matter how much computing power you throw at it, you're going to hit a wall at some point.
 
Top