OneMoar
There is Always Moar
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 8,780 (1.67/day)
- Location
- Rochester area
System Name | RPC MK2.5 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 5800x |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Aorus Pro V2 |
Cooling | Enermax ETX-T50RGB |
Memory | CL16 BL2K16G36C16U4RL 3600 1:1 micron e-die |
Video Card(s) | GIGABYTE RTX 3070 Ti GAMING OC |
Storage | ADATA SX8200PRO NVME 512GB, Intel 545s 500GBSSD, ADATA SU800 SSD, 3TB Spinner |
Display(s) | LG Ultra Gear 32 1440p 165hz Dell 1440p 75hz |
Case | Phanteks P300 /w 300A front panel conversion |
Audio Device(s) | onboard |
Power Supply | SeaSonic Focus+ Platinum 750W |
Mouse | Kone burst Pro |
Keyboard | EVGA Z15 |
Software | Windows 11 +startisallback |
can we not with the clickbait speculationWas this all just an honest mistake or was someone trying to make Intel CPUs look slower than they are? All CPU reviews during the last few years are suddenly suspect if they were not testing for this issue. Windows Defender can start and stop this part of its algorithm at any time. As soon as it starts, performance tanks.
great job finding this its a minor bug and will be shortly patched if enough noise is made about it
6% is hardly significant in the grand scheme
remember that your average user doesn't care and if it doesn't impact the average user neither does intel/microsoft
and PSA:Windows defender Consistently ranks at the top of the protection and performance charts it should be your goto when basic protection is required