- Joined
- Sep 10, 2015
- Messages
- 529 (0.16/day)
System Name | My Addiction |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7950X3D |
Motherboard | ASRock B650E PG-ITX WiFi |
Cooling | Alphacool Core Ocean T38 AIO 240mm |
Memory | G.Skill 32GB 6000MHz |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Pulse 7900XTX |
Storage | Some SSDs |
Display(s) | 42" Samsung TV + 22" Dell monitor vertically |
Case | Lian Li A4-H2O |
Audio Device(s) | Denon + Bose |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | Logitech |
Keyboard | Glorious |
VR HMD | None |
Software | Win 10 |
Benchmark Scores | None taken |
I don't think that Raja's team lied. I mean even Jon Pedie says Intel should abandon the GPU project since they were unable to pull it off in the first run. And JPR is not your overly optimistic Intel fan from around the corner. In their eyes, it would be better to trash it than sink more money in it.I’ve been reading many posts on how Intel will need 7 years to really develop their GPU products. That it will take time and they shouldn’t abandon their plans. This might all be the right way to look at it but for some reason, Intel itself is not looking at it this way. They thought they would be competitive right out of the gate and cover 90% of the competitions’ products with its own.
The scavenger hunt is evidence of this situation. Intel management and marketing is most likely being lied to by Raja’s group. Realization of these lies is just coming to the surface. So the question, can Intel still deliver in the long run on a product line built on lies?
I think the question is wether they want to handle this like a regular investment and judge it by those standards or like a "whatever it costs" project to penetrate the graphics market.