• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung Electronics Unveils Odyssey OLED G8 Gaming Monitor at IFA 2022

Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
40 (0.03/day)
Location
Los Angeles, CA
System Name Mah Baby
Processor 11700K
Motherboard Z590 Asrock phantom 4
Cooling Water
Memory 32gb 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Suprim GeForce RTX 4090 24GB GDDR6X
Storage 4 TB Gen 4 NVME
Display(s) Odyssey Neo G8
Case Fractal Design Define R5 soon to be replaced with ENTHOO PRO 2 SERVER EDITION
Audio Device(s) Klipsch Reference
Power Supply 1000 Watt EVGA
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard logitech g512 silver
VR HMD Meta Quest Pro
All i want is a 16:9 Oled that's 34 inches or smaller..... Ultrawide stinks for gaming
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,179 (2.85/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E @ 3600 CL14
Video Card(s) RTX3080 Ti FE
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GN850P-B
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster G6 | Fidelio X2 | Sennheiser 6XX
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Endgame Gear XM1R
Keyboard Wooting Two HE
According to rumors they want to price it the same as Dell's offering so around $1300.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,641 (2.00/day)
The problem is that there would need to be an industry standard for these dongles to "take over" the TV's UI, as one of the major draws of smart TVs is their integration and UX simplicity. Interoperability with stock remotes would also be a must. This wouldn't necessarily be very hard to do, but it would need a standard to have any hope of a future of compatible upgrades.

The standards already exist, HDMI CEC is perfectly able to do that and the TV just needs to select the source (like a monitor does), remote can just control the dongle directly (and it can also control the tv since tv remotes also follow some variation of the same standard anyway).

And i'm not even going as far as asking for multi brand interoperability, surely within samsung they could figure out how to make their own stuff work with each other right... right???
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
7,762 (2.74/day)
Location
Back in Norway
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6),
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
The standards already exist, HDMI CEC is perfectly able to do that and the TV just needs to select the source (like a monitor does), remote can just control the dongle directly (and it can also control the tv since tv remotes also follow some variation of the same standard anyway).

And i'm not even going as far as asking for multi brand interoperability, surely within samsung they could figure out how to make their own stuff work with each other right... right???
HDMI CEC just allows connected devices to control each other, other than that it does literally none of what I described above. I'm talking about a dongle that actually replaces the UX on the TV, which would mean things like embedding the TV's native settings menus into the overall UX from the dongle, having the dongle UX manage input switching, picture mode changes, etc. HDMI CEC is nowhere near capable of creating a unified experience like that.

And sure, Samsung could figure this out - they had upgradeable smart modules for their high end TVs for a few generations. Entirely proprietary, of course, which killed them, as obviously nobody wanted to upgrade that part frequently, and there were no options out there - meaning it's just an additional cost vs. integrating it on-board. An interoperable standard, ideally one that TVs are mandated by law to support, would be the only way of implementing this with any kind of reach and longevity.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (7.87/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
All i want is a 16:9 Oled that's 34 inches or smaller..... Ultrawide stinks for gaming
32" 4K would be ideal (And i say this as someone who owns 32" 4K and 1440p VA displays)


Ultrawide only became popular because manufacturers wanted to use leftover panels, they can use 1.5x 1440p and make an ultrawide, but they cant use that panel to make a 4K display

Dead pixels or any other manufacturing flaw could leave them with large amounts of unusable product if they stuck with 16:9, but making them wider let them use more of it - and marketing told people they wanted it.


Then of course games just used it badly or outright don't let you use it (Vertical minus instead of horizontal plus) with marketing telling gamers to buy it who then rabidly defend it despite how poorly it actually works in reality

HDMI CEC just allows connected devices to control each other, other than that it does literally none of what I described above. I'm talking about a dongle that actually replaces the UX on the TV, which would mean things like embedding the TV's native settings menus into the overall UX from the dongle, having the dongle UX manage input switching, picture mode changes, etc. HDMI CEC is nowhere near capable of creating a unified experience like that.

And sure, Samsung could figure this out - they had upgradeable smart modules for their high end TVs for a few generations. Entirely proprietary, of course, which killed them, as obviously nobody wanted to upgrade that part frequently, and there were no options out there - meaning it's just an additional cost vs. integrating it on-board. An interoperable standard, ideally one that TVs are mandated by law to support, would be the only way of implementing this with any kind of reach and longevity.
HDMI CEC is enough - seriously i have my chromecast ultra on my 1440p display and it does the job there just fine. Power button on the chromecast remote turns the screen on and off, volume controls don't work sadly

That's pretty much what you want, an OS on a stick with a remote that controls the display directly
 
Top