• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel Arc A770 Tested with PCIe 3.0 and Resizable BAR Off

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,693 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
In this article we're testing the Intel Arc A770 graphics card running at PCI-Express 3.0, to get a feel for performance on older systems that don't have the PCIe Gen 4 capability. Another round of testing is done with PCIe Resizable Bar disabled, and finally we have benchmarks on Gen 4 with ReBaR off.

Show full review
 

wolf

Better Than Native
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
8,147 (1.28/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
Wow, no wonder Intel basically flat out say if you don't have ReBAR, don't buy ARC.
 

Count von Schwalbe

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
Messages
3,011 (2.78/day)
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
System Name Work Computer | Unfinished Computer
Processor Core i7-6700 | Ryzen 5 5600X
Motherboard Dell Q170 | Gigabyte Aorus Elite Wi-Fi
Cooling A fan? | Truly Custom Loop
Memory 4x4GB Crucial 2133 C17 | 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB 3600 C26
Video Card(s) Dell Radeon R7 450 | RTX 2080 Ti FE
Storage Crucial BX500 2TB | TBD
Display(s) 3x LG QHD 32" GSM5B96 | TBD
Case Dell | Heavily Modified Phanteks P400
Power Supply Dell TFX Non-standard | EVGA BQ 650W
Mouse Monster No-Name $7 Gaming Mouse| TBD
Interesting. A bit of a pity, actually, as many of the people looking at these would be those on a considerably low budget, possibly without a ReBAR capable machine.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
8,194 (2.18/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF gaming B650
Cooling Artic Liquid Freezer 2 - 420mm
Memory G.Skill Sniper 32gb DDR5 6000
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 4070 ti super 16gb
Storage Samsung EVO 500gb & 1Tb, 2tb HDD, 500gb WD Black
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) - SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Steeseries Esports Wireless
Keyboard Corsair K100
Software windows 10 H
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
So comparable to a 3050. :twitch:
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
269 (0.05/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 4600G @4300mhz
Motherboard MSI B550-Pro VC
Cooling Scythe Mugen 5 Black Edition
Memory 16GB DDR4 4133Mhz Dual Channel
Video Card(s) IGP AMD Vega 7 Renoir @2300mhz (8GB Shared memory)
Storage 256GB NVMe PCI-E 3.0 - 6TB HDD - 4TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T22B350
Software Xubuntu 24.04 LTS x64 + Windows 10 x64
Joined
Aug 12, 2022
Messages
243 (0.30/day)
There aren't a lot of good options for PCIe 3.0 systems; every Nvidia card below the RTX 3060 and every AMD card below the RX 6700 support at most 8 PCIe lanes which means they suffer a performance hit on older systems. And the RTX 3060 and RX 6700 are rather expensive for an older computer. And older cards like the RX 5000 series and RTX 20 series are still pretty difficult to find at a price competitive with newer cards. So for people like me, still using an older Ryzen 1800X in a B350 board and an RX 480 graphics card, the Arc cards look really nice; much cheaper than the RTX 3060 but just as fast, and the DirectX 11 performance is fine because it's still better than my RX 480 which plays older games just fine; it's only in new (DirectX 12) games that I want better performance. But my system, like most PCIe 3.0 systems, doesn't support ReBar, so these Arc cards are just as bad an option (or maybe worse) than a card with 8 PCIe lanes. So I'll probably just never upgrade the graphics card in this computer.

Given that Nvidia and AMD handicapped the PCIe 3.0 performance of a lot of their GPUs, the future looks short for PCIe 4.0 graphics card slots, so I also won't be building a computer with an AMD X670 or B650 chipset which doesn't support PCIe 5.0 for the graphics card.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,332 (6.61/day)
Ok, my take-away from this is that NoReBar depends on the game and the settings. Given that the A770 is playing right where Intel said it would(which handily shuts up the nay-sayers) and is competing with upper end cards(looking at you RTX2070/RTX3060), even without ReBar, it's still a good card.

@ Intel
Remember your audience and market. MOST of the people looking at this card will be on older systems and have no desire(or ability) to upgrade now or anytime soon. Fix your ReBar problems driver-side and be snappy about it. Then make the announcement that you have improved things to make these cards more appealing to a wider market sector. You've got a good thing going here. Make the most of it!
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,513 (0.72/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name ❶ Oooh (2024) ❷ Aaaah (2021) ❸ Ahemm (2017)
Processor ❶ 5800X3D ❷ i7-9700K ❸ i7-7700K
Motherboard ❶ X570-F ❷ Z390-E ❸ Z270-E
Cooling ❶ ALFIII 360 ❷ X62 + X72 (GPU mod) ❸ X62
Memory ❶ 32-3600/16 ❷ 32-3200/16 ❸ 16-3200/16
Video Card(s) ❶ 3080 X Trio ❷ 2080TI (AIOmod) ❸ 1080TI
Storage ❶ NVME/SSD/HDD ❷ <SAME ❸ SSD/HDD
Display(s) ❶ 1440/165/IPS ❷ 1440/144/IPS ❸ 1080/144/IPS
Case ❶ BQ Silent 601 ❷ Cors 465X ❸ Frac Mesh C
Audio Device(s) ❶ HyperX C2 ❷ HyperX C2 ❸ Logi G432
Power Supply ❶ HX1200 Plat ❷ RM750X ❸ EVGA 650W G2
Mouse ❶ Logi G Pro ❷ Razer Bas V3 ❸ Logi G502
Keyboard ❶ Logi G915 TKL ❷ Anne P2 ❸ Logi G610
Software ❶ Win 11 ❷ 10 ❸ 10
Benchmark Scores I have wrestled bandwidths, Tussled with voltages, Handcuffed Overclocks, Thrown Gigahertz in Jail
A bit of a bummer for people on older non-rebar compatible hardware... but i have no problem with this. It's great to see INTEL competing in the GPU market! The only concern I have is the price... thats an easy fix which I'm sure Intel will entertain as we go along.

@ Intel
Remember your audience and market. MOST of the people looking at this card will be on older systems and have no desire(or ability) to upgrade now or anytime soon. Fix your ReBar problems driver-side and be snappy about it. Then make the announcement that you have improved things to make these cards more appealing to a wider market sector. You've got a good thing going here. Make the most of it!

I haven't looked to deep into all this rebar business. So essentially its a driver limitation? If correct, whats the reason behind limiting performance for older systems?


oh here we go! :kookoo:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 18, 2021
Messages
2,534 (2.06/day)
But my system, like most PCIe 3.0 systems, doesn't support ReBar, so these Arc cards are just as bad an option (or maybe worse) than a card with 8 PCIe lanes. So I'll probably just never upgrade the graphics card in this computer.

Check with your board manufacturer, there are both zen1 and b350/x370 boards with rebar active. If your board doesn't have the option try at least sending an email to the manufacturer support, these boards should still be supported with current agesa and if they're still issuing updates might be a matter of just un-hiding the option, either way can't really hurt.

And btw, pcie3.0 8x is fine (1-2% is margin of error).

Remember your audience and market. MOST of the people looking at this card will be on older systems and have no desire(or ability) to upgrade now or anytime soon. Fix your ReBar problems driver-side and be snappy about it. Then make the announcement that you have improved things to make these cards more appealing to a wider market sector. You've got a good thing going here. Make the most of it!

I think it's an architecture thing, they designed their memory controller with rebar in mind, not much can be done now around that. If your system is that old maybe you need more than a gpu upgrade anyway? (given that as I said above, boards as far back as b350/x370 have rebar support enabled).
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,332 (6.61/day)
So essentially its a driver limitation?
Not entirely. But if properly optimized, the drivers could smooth out the rough edges of the performance hit.

I think it's an architecture thing
That's part of it. There is always the hardware/software interface.
they designed their memory controller with rebar in mind, not much can be done now around that.
What Intel could do on systems without Rebar is invoke a system RAM caching scheme. It would be slower but effective and faster than without a cache. Such a scheme has been done in the past.

However, let's remember, even without ReBar, these card are still usable at 1080p and are a solid first go at the GPU market.

If I were AMD and NVidia I would be concerned if not worried.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 6, 2020
Messages
729 (0.47/day)
So comparable to a 3050. :twitch:



and these only cost 10 % more than this does on launch day:



looking to be really poor value fo anyone not having resizable bar (those cards are both 50% faster, when you add the bar plus pcie 3 hit)

then there's the 50% lower performance/watt to take us back to the absolutely roasting R9 390 surrounded by GTX 970 at s tepid 160w!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
1,513 (0.72/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name ❶ Oooh (2024) ❷ Aaaah (2021) ❸ Ahemm (2017)
Processor ❶ 5800X3D ❷ i7-9700K ❸ i7-7700K
Motherboard ❶ X570-F ❷ Z390-E ❸ Z270-E
Cooling ❶ ALFIII 360 ❷ X62 + X72 (GPU mod) ❸ X62
Memory ❶ 32-3600/16 ❷ 32-3200/16 ❸ 16-3200/16
Video Card(s) ❶ 3080 X Trio ❷ 2080TI (AIOmod) ❸ 1080TI
Storage ❶ NVME/SSD/HDD ❷ <SAME ❸ SSD/HDD
Display(s) ❶ 1440/165/IPS ❷ 1440/144/IPS ❸ 1080/144/IPS
Case ❶ BQ Silent 601 ❷ Cors 465X ❸ Frac Mesh C
Audio Device(s) ❶ HyperX C2 ❷ HyperX C2 ❸ Logi G432
Power Supply ❶ HX1200 Plat ❷ RM750X ❸ EVGA 650W G2
Mouse ❶ Logi G Pro ❷ Razer Bas V3 ❸ Logi G502
Keyboard ❶ Logi G915 TKL ❷ Anne P2 ❸ Logi G610
Software ❶ Win 11 ❷ 10 ❸ 10
Benchmark Scores I have wrestled bandwidths, Tussled with voltages, Handcuffed Overclocks, Thrown Gigahertz in Jail
Not entirely. But if properly optimized, the drivers could smooth out the rough edges of the performance hit.

good stuff! little improvements here and there as we go along is what i like to hear :)
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,693 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
What Intel could do on systems without Rebar is invoke a system RAM caching scheme. It would be slower but effective and faster than without a cache. Such a scheme has been done in the past.
Sorry but no, that's not how it works like at all.

Data is already in RAM, so no point making a copy to cache it in RAM. The problem is the 256 MB aperture with ReBAR off, which means all data has to get funneled through a small window
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2020
Messages
459 (0.32/day)
Location
Earth, Solar System, Milky Way Galaxy, Local Group
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming B550M-Plus (Wi-Fi)
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE; Arctic P12, F12
Memory Crucial BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE1 ×2
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6600 XT
Storage Kingston SKC3000D/2048G; Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L2; Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102
Display(s) AOC 24G2W1G4
Case Sama MiCube
Audio Device(s) Somic G923
Power Supply EVGA 650 GD
Mouse Logitech G102
Keyboard Logitech K845 TTC Brown
Software Windows 10 Pro 1903, Dism++, CCleaner
Benchmark Scores CPU-Z 17.01.64: 3700X @ 4.6 GHz 1.3375 V scoring 557/6206; 760K @ 5 GHz 1.5 V scoring 292/964
When could Intel ever learn to be humble?
Now the situation is, Intel have to optimise no-ReBAR system whether Intel want to do so or not.
With a product like this, they need to be humble enough to do enough optimisation to make it more competitive (yeah ray-tracing performance is pretty shiny by comparison).
Not to say this is a bad product or bad attempt, but certainly I won't be paying for this, just because I think they've got a lot more to do.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 11, 2021
Messages
214 (0.16/day)
There aren't a lot of good options for PCIe 3.0 systems; every Nvidia card below the RTX 3060 and every AMD card below the RX 6700 support at most 8 PCIe lanes which means they suffer a performance hit on older systems. And the RTX 3060 and RX 6700 are rather expensive for an older computer. And older cards like the RX 5000 series and RTX 20 series are still pretty difficult to find at a price competitive with newer cards. So for people like me, still using an older Ryzen 1800X in a B350 board and an RX 480 graphics card, the Arc cards look really nice; much cheaper than the RTX 3060 but just as fast, and the DirectX 11 performance is fine because it's still better than my RX 480 which plays older games just fine; it's only in new (DirectX 12) games that I want better performance. But my system, like most PCIe 3.0 systems, doesn't support ReBar, so these Arc cards are just as bad an option (or maybe worse) than a card with 8 PCIe lanes. So I'll probably just never upgrade the graphics card in this computer.

Given that Nvidia and AMD handicapped the PCIe 3.0 performance of a lot of their GPUs, the future looks short for PCIe 4.0 graphics card slots, so I also won't be building a computer with an AMD X670 or B650 chipset which doesn't support PCIe 5.0 for the graphics card.
While AMD and Intel claim that it's compatible only with series 500 motherboards, Resizable BAR, or SAM as AMD calls it, support was added with AMD AGESA 1.1.0.0 even to series 400 motherboards and it should work even with the series 300 ones now that many (most?) motherboards have belatedly received BIOS updates in order to enable Zen 3 compatibility. I would try to check it out with your motherboard manufacturer whether there's an update available and if it does enable ReBAR.

EDIT: Thinking about it, some tests done with PCIe Gen 3 + ReBAR on legacy Intel and AMD platforms could be interesting.
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,457 (0.35/day)
Location
Australia
So the take away from this is if you want to use the full features of new generation cards like these new Intel dGPU cards then its best to have a newer generation system that is capable of resizable bar & at least 1 primary PCIe v4 graphics slot. :) Especially if gaming at 4k or 1440p with ultra settings.
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
1,651 (0.79/day)
System Name Personal Gaming Rig
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Carbon
Cooling MO-RA 3 420
Memory 32GB 6000MHz
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 ICHILL FROSTBITE ULTRA
Storage 4x 2TB Nvme
Display(s) Samsung G8 OLED
Case Silverstone FT04
It is not a abug
it is a
Pay Bills Feature GIF by GCash
 
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
42 (0.01/day)
so resizable BAR or SAM not for advantage anymore, but become requirement.. its more like athletes doing doping or they cannot running..
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2011
Messages
1,005 (0.21/day)
Location
South-Africa
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING (WI-FI)
Cooling Corsair iCUE H115i Elite Capellix 280mm
Memory 32GB G.Skill DDR4 3600Mhz CL18
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 3070 Ti TUF Gaming OC Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket 1TB M.2
Display(s) Dell S3220DGF
Case Corsair iCUE 4000X
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar D2X
Power Supply Corsair AX760 Platinum
Mouse Razer DeathAdder V2 - Wireless
Software Microsoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit)
so resizable BAR or SAM not for advantage anymore, but become requirement.. its more like athletes doing doping or they cannot running..

At least, for now.

Future releases, drivers/firmware updates may smooth things down the line. Time will tell. We might even see prices drop because of this.
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2005
Messages
7,240 (1.03/day)
Location
Stuck somewhere in the 80's Jpop era....
System Name Lynni PS \ Lenowo TwinkPad L14 G2
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7700 Raphael (Waiting on 9800X3D) \ i5-1135G7 Tiger Lake-U
Motherboard ASRock B650M PG Riptide Bios v. 3.08 AMD AGESA 1.2.0.2 \ Lenowo BDPLANAR Bios 1.68
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax.Black (Only middle fan) \ Lenowo C-267C-2
Memory G.Skill Flare X5 2x16GB DDR5 6000MHZ CL36-36-36-96 AMD EXPO \ Willk Elektronik 2x16GB 2666MHZ CL17
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX™ 4070 Dual OC (Waiting on RX 8800 XT) | Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics
Storage Gigabyte M30 1TB|Sabrent Rocket 2TB| HDD: 10TB|1TB \ WD RED SN700 1TB
Display(s) KTC M27T20S 1440p@165Hz | LG 48CX OLED 4K HDR | Innolux 14" 1080p
Case Asus Prime AP201 White Mesh | Lenowo L14 G2 chassis
Audio Device(s) Steelseries Arctis Pro Wireless
Power Supply Be Quiet! Pure Power 12 M 750W Goldie | 65W
Mouse Logitech G305 Lightspeedy Wireless | Lenowo TouchPad & Logitech G305
Keyboard Ducky One 3 Daybreak Fullsize | L14 G2 UK Lumi
Software Win11 Pro 23H2 UK | Win11 LTSC UK / Arch (Fan)
Benchmark Scores 3DMARK: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/89434432? GPU-Z: https://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/details/v3zbr
I am surprised that with ReSizeable Bar enabled the performance being PCI-E 3.0 or 4.0 is so close well done Intel :rockout:
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2013
Messages
27,332 (6.61/day)
Sorry but no, that's not how it works like at all.
Damn, just a thought.
The problem is the 256 MB aperture with ReBAR off, which means all data has to get funneled through a small window
Perhaps that can be changed to something larger. 1024MB or 1536MB would likely help or even 4GB, assuming the aperture can be changed..
 
Last edited:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
27,693 (3.70/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Perhaps that can be changed to something larger. 1024MB or 1536MB would likely help or even 4GB, assuming the aperture can be changed..
That's the definition of Resizeable BAR :)
 
Top