- Joined
- May 2, 2017
- Messages
- 7,762 (2.78/day)
- Location
- Back in Norway
System Name | Hotbox |
---|---|
Processor | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, 110/95/110, PBO +150Mhz, CO -7,-7,-20(x6), |
Motherboard | ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax |
Cooling | LOBO + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14 |
Memory | 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14 @3800c15 |
Video Card(s) | PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UC@2250MHz max @~200W |
Storage | 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro |
Display(s) | Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary |
Case | SSUPD Meshlicious |
Audio Device(s) | Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3 |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 Platinum |
Mouse | Logitech G603 |
Keyboard | Keychron K3/Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps |
Software | Windows 10 Pro |
But DDR4 also has no problems running two different sized kits in dual channel.The non-binary DDR5 is because DDR5 is two 32 bit RAM modules together (hence the quad-channel reading in CPU-Z)
Also, DDR5 sub-channels are AFAIK teamed together on a low enough level that describing them as sub-channels is more accurate than treating them as separate channels.
If so, then why would a GDDR controller not be fine with a similar "1.5x power of two" amount of memory per channel? Even on DDR5 it's not like that would split into 16GB on one sub-channel and 32 on the other - both DIMMs would be split evenly.2x 16+32 is fine