• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

I haven't said anything about specific prices (I don't know anything about that, unfortunately :( ), but I might have speculated about base prices maybe? I know I wrote something about something in that direction in the past couple of days, but I can't remember if I pulled a number out of my rear end or if I just said "cheap" :p You might be thinking about someone else too I guess.

I really, really hope we'll see decent B650 boards in that range as well, and I completely agree with you on 250+ boards being just silly for pretty much any ordinary use. They have tons of features, so it's not like you aren't getting anything for your money - but it's not things that people actually need. Personally I wouldn't worry about forward compatibility though. If it has VRMs to run a 7950X full tilt (which it ought to have - but that's also a big part of why prices are rising!) then it should handle any future AM5 CPU, given that the socket is specced at 230W, and that is unlikely to change. Of course you're still dependent on BIOS updates to support new hardware. I just hope AMD is less flaky about that this time around.
MSI PRO B650M-A WIFI $199.99

 
MSI PRO B650M-A WIFI $199.99


9vXvL29.jpg


But but but 125us mainboards where stay ??

5DbPtev.gif


UIfdzXS.gif


:)
 
Last edited:
9vXvL29.jpg


But but but 125us mainboards where stay ??

5DbPtev.gif


UIfdzXS.gif


:)
... so you're taking a few leaked B550 motherboard prices as confirmation that there will be no boards at the advertised $125 price point? Solid logic, that.
 
... so you're taking a few leaked B550 motherboard prices as confirmation that there will be no boards at the advertised $125 price point? Solid logic, that.
A $125 B650 DDR5 board if one exist is going to be pretty lean.

 
Last edited:
How long before we see vapor chamber IHS on stock processors?
 
How long before we see vapor chamber IHS on stock processors?

is that even a thing?

I thought vapor chambers were specifically designed to more effectively dissipate heat via heatpipes?
 
is that even a thing?

I thought vapor chambers were specifically designed to more effectively dissipate heat via heatpipes?
No, but it could be. A vapor chamber is very efficient at spreading heat laterally. Integrating it with the heatpipes is just an extra benefit.
 
No, but it could be. A vapor chamber is very efficient at spreading heat laterally. Integrating it with the heatpipes is just an extra benefit.
And the die surface area seems to be the hold back on these chips, maybe when they release the 3D chip they can add it to help with heat dissipation.

is the CPU die up or down on the the chip when installed?
 
And the die surface area seems to be the hold back on these chips, maybe when they release the 3D chip they can add it to help with heat dissipation.

is the CPU die up or down on the the chip when installed?
Should show in der8auer's delid video.
 
How long before we see vapor chamber IHS on stock processors?
I've been asking this for years already. It's bound to arrive at some point, either as a third party product or stock offering on extreme models. Price and structural integrity would both be challenges to overcome first though.
 
No, but it could be. A vapor chamber is very efficient at spreading heat laterally. Integrating it with the heatpipes is just an extra benefit.

Gotcha!! I thought vapor chambers and heatpipes opened up into each other. Looking into it a little deeper, i see these are separate mechanisms joined together for conductive heat transfer opposed to transfer of vapor.

I get it now... lateral heat spread > more "equal" IHS surface roasting > potentially improved thermals with coolers more easily transfering/dissipating heat.

If this is correct, please gimme a pat on the back :P (i'm learning)
 
Gotcha!! I thought vapor chambers and heatpipes opened up into each other. Looking into it a little deeper, i see these are separate mechanisms joined together for conductive heat transfer opposed to transfer of vapor.

I get it now... lateral heat spread > more "equal" IHS surface roasting > potentially improved thermals with coolers more easily transfering/dissipating heat.

If this is correct, please gimme a pat on the back :p (i'm learning)
Yup. Some coolers "may" have them integrated, to help balance the heat across the pipes, but I am speaking theoretically.
 
Quite a flop and doesn't bring much to the table compared to ADL. Raptor Lake has a chance to beat zen 4 on price and performance.
if only with ddr4. or you will be getting slower therefore cheaper cpus lol.
 
If they are smart, they will do a 7600X3D and destroy all Intel CPUs in gaming performance (probably even Meteor Lake) with incredible value.

If they are greedy (like with Zen 3), they will only do that with 8 cores and above. I do not think they can afford to be greedy this time, with how poorly Zen 4 is selling. Seriously, 7600X3D at $300-350, lower the price of the 7600X to $250 and release a 7600 at $200 or slightly below (depending on what the 13400 does). This would be a win.
 
If they are smart, they will do a 7600X3D and destroy all Intel CPUs in gaming performance (probably even Meteor Lake) with incredible value.

If they are greedy (like with Zen 3), they will only do that with 8 cores and above. I do not think they can afford to be greedy this time, with how poorly Zen 4 is selling. Seriously, 7600X3D at $300-350, lower the price of the 7600X to $250 and release a 7600 at $200 or slightly below (depending on what the 13400 does). This would be a win.
Yeah, I can't quite bring myself to believe that AMD would be stupid enough to not go hard for competing on price once the X3D models launch. Cut the 7600X to $200-230, launch the 7600X3D at $250-270 - $300 at the very most - go after Intel where it hurts, in the mass market gaming parts, where the PR victories live. Even if the DIY market is tiny overall, it's vitally important for PR and gaining marketshare long term, and they can't afford to waste the goodwill they gained with Zen2 and Zen3. And competitive DIY value sells a ton of prebuilts and laptops.
 
The difference between these results is small enough that it is easily explained by differences in games tested, test scenes and so on.
Right, HUB even said that it's effectively a tie in the video, which is the only sensible conclusion. The 7600x's problem is that it's vastly inferior to the 13600k in heavy multi-threaded workloads, and at an analogous price point. It does run at lower power, which is nice, but I think quibbling over low single-digit gaming perf differences is silly here. AMD needs to lower prices in this space.
 
The difference between these results is small enough that it is easily explained by differences in games tested, test scenes and so on.
Good luck on finding a tech site that has the same results as HUB in regards to those two cpu's.
 
Good luck on finding a tech site that has the same results as HUB in regards to those two cpu's.
... as I said, different test methodologies, test scenes, games, etc. To have they same results those would have to be the same, so... yes?
 
IGP performance is better than I expected. My Core i5 struggles playing indie games with the IGP.
 
Back
Top