• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

I think there is small mistake in table UE5 on page8 https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-7600x/8.html , i somehow doubt that i5 11400F is fastest? :D probably it should be 146.3s instead 46?

EDIT: does this forum work fine in FF? Tried to quote original post (to tag wizzard) but apparently I cant get it to show here...
I use this in FF all the time, works fine. Check your blockers, clear your cache...
 
I think there is small mistake in table UE5 on page8 https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-7600x/8.html , i somehow doubt that i5 11400F is fastest? :D probably it should be 146.3s instead 46?

EDIT: does this forum work fine in FF? Tried to quote original post (to tag wizzard) but apparently I cant get it to show here...
I cannot quote it as well, perhaps tagging @W1zzard directly would work? I am not sure but there there is no way in hell the 11400F is fastest than all of the other CPUs lol.
 
I think there is small mistake in table UE5 on page8 https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-5-7600x/8.html , i somehow doubt that i5 11400F is fastest? :D probably it should be 146.3s instead 46?

EDIT: does this forum work fine in FF? Tried to quote original post (to tag wizzard) but apparently I cant get it to show here...
This is definitely a measurement error. I'll haveto setup a 11400F system and rerun the test.

Quoting the original post (the full review text) isn't possible because it would end up being a huge quote :)

I cannot quote it as well, perhaps tagging @W1zzard directly would work? I am not sure but there there is no way in hell the 11400F is fastest than all of the other CPUs lol.
Thanks for tagging me, this always helps
 
While the performance gains over the previous 5600x is impressive.... The i5 12600k still remains very competitive and comes close to its performance.... While the 7950X and 7900X's performance gains are very big and impressive compared to the 5950X/5900X and I9 12900k.... The 7600X and 7700X barely overtake the 12600k and 12700k in gaming and productivity workloads and 13th gen Raptor lake is not that far away....

Gaining what ?, in most games 144+ fps is enough for most, it's only going be a real benefit if the lows are improved.
 
Allow me to introduce you to @robot zombie...
IIRC, I actually did hit the length limit for posts once or twice and had to get creative. Taking that into account, I'm capable of writing posts that will in fact be absolutely impossible to quote in a single post, no matter how you try.

It's a lot of responsibility, NGL. If I let my powers go unrestricted, words would be pouring out of people's screens at pressures upwards of 10000wsi (word-force per square inch.)
 
Gaining what ?, in most games 144+ fps is enough for most, it's only going be a real benefit if the lows are improved.
I was talking about the AVG FPS and Applications suite gains of the 7600X compared to the 5600X. I'd suggest you watch Gamers Nexus's reviews and compare the lows there if you want to compare between them. Of course 144+ FPS would be enough for most but it does not mean we can just completely ignore the architecture improvements if we're going by the your logic. It wouldn't make sense at all to go with a 7600X if one has a 5600X already but it would not make sense for one to build a new system with the 5600X instead of the 7600X in these days.
 
I use FireFox exclusively. No issues.


No offense intended I'm sure.. :toast:
Certainly not! He jokes about it himself though...
I missed these, but without stealing the thread, I'll clarify a little. I know what it is for me and what it's all about. I know what my intentions are, and the value of my own effort. I know that the way I formulate posts stands out for the length, and that people will have a range of reactions to it. But the only person who ever knows why I do it, is me. I don't hold other people to that understanding, will never be mad at someone for cracking little jokes or saying "Sorry, this is too much for me to read." If it was all about being taken seriously, I'd be much more concise. And I typically am when I *really* have an important point to make. Every time I am long-winded, I knowingly take a chance on not being heard. It's a fully willing compromise, so being angry isn't really part of the whole equation. I accept the limitations of long form writing styles.
 
Last edited:
I missed these, but without stealing the thread, I'll clarify a little. I know what it is for me and what it's all about. I know what my intentions are, and the value of my own effort. I know that the way I formulate posts stands out for the length, and that people will have a range of reactions to it. But the only person who ever knows why I do it, is me. I don't hold other people to that understanding, will never be mad at someone for cracking little jokes or saying "Sorry, this is too much for me to read." If it was all about being taken seriously, I'd be much more concise. And I typically am when I *really* have an important point to make. Every time I am long-winded, I knowingly take a chance on not being heard. It's a fully willing compromise, so being angry isn't really part of the whole equation. I accept the limitations of long form writing styles.

^its all good!

I'm more concerned about your listed 'system specs'...... "benchmark score: ask your mother"

cheeky!
 
^its all good!

I'm more concerned about your listed 'system specs'...... "benchmark score: ask your mother"

cheeky!
LMAOOO EYYYY! I myself forgot I put that there! :laugh:

I think at the time, I just wanted to be done filling them out :rolleyes:

Regardless, those specs are pretty out of date... I haven't seen your mother since ~2019. ;)
 
Back
Top