GeIL to unveil DDR5-8000 16GB x2 Ultra-Speed Memory Kit

[btarunr]

One of the world's leading PC components & peripheral manufacturers is proud to announce the grand launch of the DDR5-8000 16 GB x 2 CL38-48-48-90 1.45 V ultra-speed modules will be available in Q1, 2023. GeIL DDR5 lineup includes EVO V and Polaris RGB are tailor-made for hardcore gamers and hardware enthusiasts to deliver unparalleled performance and stability. In addition, GeIL Dyna 5 has created a comprehensive and efficient automated testing process for grading and sorting every DDR5 IC. As a result, GeIL ensures the bandwidth data transmission, compatibility, reliability, and integrity to meet all the demands of gamers and overclockers using Intel's latest platforms.

GeIL DDR5-8000 MHz series has passed the required burn-in tests using the latest ASUS ROG MAXIMUS Z790 APEX motherboard. The following screenshots indicate those test results. GeIL is a brand committed to offering memory products with a wider range of overclocking potential to PC enthusiasts and gamers. The latest GeIL DDR5-8000 memory modules are built with the advanced PMIC (Power Management IC), which can effectively obtain and control a wider range of localized voltage adjustments. The PMIC is used to enhance the overall stability and performance of the memory module and can effectively unlock additional overclocking headroom.



GeIL DDR5-8000 memory modules will be available at major retailers worldwide in Q1 2023. These modules are the intelligent choice for users looking to get high-performance DDR5 memory that has been highly customized for pro gamers and overclockers alike.

For more information, visit the product pages of the GeIL EVO V DDR5 series and Polaris RGB DDR5 series.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[Space Lynx]

that L2 and L3 cache is really lacking in the aida64 mem test... seen better on cheap DDR4 kits.

@ir_cow thoughts?

 

[eidairaman1]

Gah the timings just keep getting worse on ddr

 

[ir_cow]

that L2 and L3 cache is really lacking in the aida64 mem test... seen better on cheap DDR4 kits.

@ir_cow thoughts?

L1, L2, L3 is a CPu thing, unrelated to the dram.

 

[PrettyKitten800]

Gah the timings just keep getting worse on ddr

Cut those timings in half and compare it to the timings on a DRR4 4000 kit. Basically, the RAM is running at twice the speed, so the timing windows are roughly twice the size. The numbers are getting larger, but that doesn’t mean they’re getting comparatively “worse”. This is exemplified by the 53.5ns latency. That latency is equivalent to more recent higher-end DDR4 kits with “better” timings.

 

[aQi]

Cut those timings in half and compare it to the timings on a DRR4 4000 kit. Basically, the RAM is running at twice the speed, so the timing windows are roughly twice the size. The numbers are getting larger, but that doesn’t mean they’re getting comparatively “worse”. This is exemplified by the 53.5ns latency. That latency is equivalent to more recent higher-end DDR4 kits with “better” timings.

And ddr5 has also sub channels, technically does quad channel in dual channel configuration.

 

[Calmmo]

Hynix Adie has single handedly made DDR5 worth it. Now just to wait 6-12 months for prices to normalize on the 7600+ kits.
14th gen gonna be pretty interesting

 

[dj-electric]

Gah the timings just keep getting worse on ddr

Who cares? look at those blazing speeds shown in reality. Records for latency, for all sorts of sequential numbers too on dual channel.
And this is just DDR5 not halfway in its potential, this will get a lot faster.

People give way too much attention to box figures, and not enough for actual ones.

 

[ir_cow]

DDR5-8000 is a pain right now. need a good binned CPU and a motherboard that is rated for it. Once the next Intel IMC comes out, it will be a different story.

ir_cow`s y-cruncher - Pi-2.5b score: 49 sec 519 ms with a Core i9 13900K

The Core i9 13900K @ 5700MHzscores getScoreFormatted in the y-cruncher - Pi-2.5b benchmark. ir_cowranks #null worldwide and #null in the hardware class. Find out more at HWBOT.

hwbot.org

 

[ThrashZone]

Gah the timings just keep getting worse on ddr

Hi,
C38 for 8k is not bad
I've seen a lot worse and it said ultra low latency to in the same sentence

DDR5-8000 is a pain right now. need a good binned CPU and a motherboard that is rated for it. Once the next Intel IMC comes out, it will be a different story.

ir_cow`s y-cruncher - Pi-2.5b score: 49 sec 519 ms with a Core i9 13900K

The Core i9 13900K @ 5700MHzscores getScoreFormatted in the y-cruncher - Pi-2.5b benchmark. ir_cowranks #null worldwide and #null in the hardware class. Find out more at HWBOT.

hwbot.org

Forgot your apex

I remember a time when they were 400.us hehe

 

[ir_cow]

Forgot your apex

I remember a time when they were 400.us hehe

Right? Lowest I could go was 36-46-46-50 with 1.5V. Played around with the subtimings too. I think it ended up not passing y-cruncher after messing with it for a while. Can't remember why exactly I didn't submit a score. If it can't do a ycruncher run, it isn't stable

The funny thing about those ycruncher scores, clock speeds has a greater impact. Get it to 6GHz with DDR5-6800 and it will beat out DDR5-8000+ with a stock CPU.

 

[ThrashZone]

Right? Lowest I could go was 36-46-46-50 with 1.5V. Played around with the subtimings too. I think it ended up not passing y-cruncher after messing with it for a while. Can't remember why exactly I didn't submit a score. If it can't do a ycruncher run, it isn't stable

The funny thing about those ycruncher scores, clock speeds has a greater impact. Get it to 6GHz with DDR5-6800 and it will beat out DDR5-8000+ with a stock CPU.

Hi,
Not as bad at what the z590 apex cost it was 600.us
Still to much

https://www.amazon.com/ASUS-ROG-Z690-motherboard-front-panel/dp/B09K8P12GN/ref=sr_1_2?crid=1LM6L0RDU7TF9&keywords=z590+apex&qid=1672098023&s=electronics&sprefix=z590+apex%2Celectronics%2C95&sr=1-2

Amazon warehouse I see why it's a little lower.

 

[Minus Infinity]

Good to see DDR5 bringing lower voltages to the table. So much for reducing power usage.

 

[SOAREVERSOR]

Timings and speeds aren't where to look it's latency.

 

[Prima.Vera]

Finally some worthy DDR5 modules.
Curious if G-Skill will respond in kind

 

[kinz]

Gah the timings just keep getting worse on ddr

This is objectively untrue. A latency of 38 cycles at a clock rate of 8000 cycles per second = 19 nanoseconds.
DDR5 5600 with a latency of 27 cycles =19.3 nanoseconds.
As of writing this, the tightest timings available on Newegg for DDR5 5600 are a CAS latency of 28. And most of the older DDR5 5600 DIMMs have much higher latencies.