• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Intel to Go Ahead with "Meteor Lake" 6P+16E Processor on the Desktop Platform?

Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
777 (0.18/day)
Location
Poland
System Name THU
Processor Intel Core i5-13600KF
Motherboard ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4
Cooling SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2
Memory Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank)
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V)
Storage Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB
Display(s) LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q
Case Fractal Design Define R6
Audio Device(s) Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506
Power Supply Corsair RM650
Mouse Logitech M705 Marathon
Keyboard Corsair K55 RGB PRO
Software Windows 10 Home
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks in 2024?
Those Crestmont cores are quite more powerful than Skylake cores in 8700K. They won't have hyper threading, but 2 real cores are more powerful than a virtual thread. So just E-core block alone would be better than 8700K.

Have you seen any gaming benchmarks using just the E-cores? I tried googling but found no results.

TPU did such a test for the 12900K, where the E-cores were significantly behind the 10600K in games where single-threaded performance matters. The new E-cores have double the cache and higher clock speeds, so a test like this would be interesting.

It doesn't change the point, though, that a gamer looking for a new CPU will only look at the P-cores. So while an i5 with 6 P-cores is fine, an i7 would be a complete waste of money, just like the i9 is right now.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2019
Messages
169 (0.09/day)
Have you seen any gaming benchmarks using just the E-cores? I tried googling but found no results.

TPU did such a test for the 12900K, where the E-cores were significantly behind the 10600K in games where single-threaded performance matters. The new E-cores have double the cache and higher clock speeds, so a test like this would be interesting.

It doesn't change the point, though, that a gamer looking for a new CPU will only look at the P-cores. So while an i5 with 6 P-cores is fine, an i7 would be a complete waste of money, just like the i9 is right now.
6 P-cores are enough for games that do not require massive threading and paralleling, like strategy games. You getting your cache and clocks in those. But in strategy games and games with huge amount of NPC that require row compute power and threading difference would be noticeable.


720p, where you hit the ceil of API overhead and where it doesn't matter whatever it's 300 fps or 350 fps.
Still it's as fast as 6-core 9400F at lower clocks.




But in 4K there is no difference
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2014
Messages
560 (0.15/day)
Location
Midwest USA
System Name Core
Processor Intel 12900k @ 5.3/4.0
Motherboard MSI z690 Tomahawk
Cooling Custom H20
Memory GSkill 64GB 3600 cas 15 b die
Video Card(s) ASUS RTX 4070 Super OC'
Storage Optane 900p x2, SK Hynix p41 Pro
Display(s) ACER 250hz 1080p 25" VA display x2
Case Phanteks p500a with all Arctic/Thermaltake fans
Audio Device(s) Focusrite interface, Presonus Studio Monitors and Subwoofer
Power Supply Seasonic 850w plat with cable mod cables
Mouse Glorious Model O
Keyboard Havic mech
Software Win 11 Pro
Why all the hate for e cores? If youre a gamer, yeah, turn em off if you want. But if you do anything else on your pc, those e cores can make a significant difference.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2019
Messages
264 (0.14/day)
System Name Ryzen 1
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard MSI B550 Gaming Plus
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB Patriot Viper 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) AMD RX 7800 XT 16GB
Storage SSD's
Display(s) HP X32 32" 1440p 165Hz
Case Phanteks P400A
Power Supply Superflower Leadex III 750w
Top