- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 777 (0.18/day)
- Location
- Poland
System Name | THU |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
Motherboard | ASUS PRIME Z790-P D4 |
Cooling | SilentiumPC Fortis 3 v2 + Arctic Cooling MX-2 |
Memory | Crucial Ballistix 2x16 GB DDR4-3600 CL16 (dual rank) |
Video Card(s) | MSI GeForce RTX 4070 Ventus 3X OC 12 GB GDDR6X (2610/21000 @ 0.91 V) |
Storage | Lexar NM790 2 TB + Corsair MP510 960 GB + PNY XLR8 CS3030 500 GB + Toshiba E300 3 TB |
Display(s) | LG OLED C8 55" + ASUS VP229Q |
Case | Fractal Design Define R6 |
Audio Device(s) | Yamaha RX-V381 + Monitor Audio Bronze 6 + Bronze FX | FiiO E10K-TC + Sony MDR-7506 |
Power Supply | Corsair RM650 |
Mouse | Logitech M705 Marathon |
Keyboard | Corsair K55 RGB PRO |
Software | Windows 10 Home |
Benchmark Scores | Benchmarks in 2024? |
Those Crestmont cores are quite more powerful than Skylake cores in 8700K. They won't have hyper threading, but 2 real cores are more powerful than a virtual thread. So just E-core block alone would be better than 8700K.
Have you seen any gaming benchmarks using just the E-cores? I tried googling but found no results.
TPU did such a test for the 12900K, where the E-cores were significantly behind the 10600K in games where single-threaded performance matters. The new E-cores have double the cache and higher clock speeds, so a test like this would be interesting.
It doesn't change the point, though, that a gamer looking for a new CPU will only look at the P-cores. So while an i5 with 6 P-cores is fine, an i7 would be a complete waste of money, just like the i9 is right now.