• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Samsung Exynos 2300 SoC Specifications Leak, Touted to Feature a Cortex-X3 Super Core Within 9-Core Cluster

T0@st

News Editor
Joined
Mar 7, 2023
Messages
2,077 (3.17/day)
Location
South East, UK
Kernel information for a chipset code-named 'Quadra' has been leaked by Home IT. It appears that this SoC is under development at Samsung Electronics, and could be featured in the company's next generation flagship smartphone range. The recently released Galaxy S23 smartphone series is powered by Qualcomm's cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, which ended up being a fine choice for the end user. This was not an ideal partnership for the semiconductor giant, considering its constant push to promote internally developed hardware.

Industry experts have praised Samsung for not integrating an Exynos processor into this generation of devices, including regional model variations, but that has not stopped the company's persistent development cycle of proprietary mobile CPUs. Rumors point to a collaboration with Google, and the Exynos 2300 SoC looks to form the basis of the latter's next generation Tensor G3 chipset. The leak reveals that the standard 2300 has been designed as a 1+4+4 core configuration, comprised of four performance cores, four efficiency cores, and one super core.



The specifications point to the single ARM Cortex-X3 super core being clocked at a maximum clock speed of 3.09 GHz. The four performance ARM Cortex-A715 cores come in at 2.65 GHz, and the efficiency ARM Cortex-A510 cores will clock in at 2.1 GHz. Based on this leak of internals, the Exynos 2300 seems to be capable of trading blows with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, which also shares a similar configuration of cores and clock frequencies.

The GPU onboard the chipset has been named 'Xclipse 930', and appears to be the product of a continued collaboration between Samsung and AMD. The previous generation Exynos 2200's GPU was based on AMD RDNA 2 architecture, and it looks as if the latest chipset will inherit an updated version of this technology.



Industry insiders have theorized that Samsung is already looking beyond the scope of the rumored Exynos 2300. Producing AI-powered features for future Galaxy devices is a key goal, and requires the integration of a Neural Processing Unit into a chipset. Google's Tensor SoCs already feature similar technology in the form of their custom TPU (Tensor Processing Unit). The rumored collaboration between Samsung and Google could result in the latter's expertise in machine learning tasks being useful in the engineering of next generation Exynos SoCs.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site | Source
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,705 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
Joined
Feb 18, 2023
Messages
245 (0.36/day)
So, is this good or bad news?

Is this Exynos going to be better than snap dragon or will it suck as current Exynos ones?
 
Joined
Nov 26, 2021
Messages
1,705 (1.52/day)
Location
Mississauga, Canada
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Motherboard ASUS TUF Gaming X570-PRO (WiFi 6)
Cooling Noctua NH-C14S (two fans)
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) Reference Vega 64
Storage Intel 665p 1TB, WD Black SN850X 2TB, Crucial MX300 1TB SATA, Samsung 830 256 GB SATA
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG27, and Samsung S23A700
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME TITANIUM 850W
Mouse Logitech
VR HMD Oculus Rift
Software Windows 11 Pro, and Ubuntu 20.04
Yeah, but TSMC has been getting more expensive in the past couple of years. I can't remember samsung raising prices
That's a good point, but given the small sizes of smartphone chips, the difference due to foundries is probably only $15 to $20 per chip.-Of course, not paying Qualcomm is another avenue for savings, but that hasn't meant cheaper Exynos phones in the past.
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
913 (0.85/day)
So, is this good or bad news?

Is this Exynos going to be better than snap dragon or will it suck as current Exynos ones?
Dunno, the architecture wasn't bad tsmc just did a better job making the chips.
which was very obvious with the 8 gen 1 and the 8 gen 1+
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,460 (0.36/day)
How much of a difference is it between Exynos and Google Tensor of the same generation?

I'm not talking about specifications like core configuration as I know they are different, but overall performance or battery life for the end user.

Tensor never gets as much negative comments as Exynos, is it because Pixels are cheaper than GS? Or just because GS didn't use their own chip on all markets?

Maybe Exynos would have died out if Google wouldn't have showed up wanting chips lol.. yeah probably not.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 11, 2022
Messages
913 (0.85/day)
How much of a difference is it between Exynos and Google Tensor of the same generation?

I'm not talking about specifications like core configuration as I know they are different, but overall performance or battery life for the end user.

Tensor never gets as much negative comments as Exynos, is it because Pixels are cheaper than GS? Or just because GS didn't use their own chip on all markets?

Maybe Exynos would have died out if Google wouldn't have showed up wanting chips lol.. yeah probably not.
I'm quite happy it still lives.
Far better than having a duopoly of basic arm and qualcom
 

SL2

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
2,460 (0.36/day)
Dunno, the architecture wasn't bad tsmc just did a better job making the chips.
which was very obvious with the 8 gen 1 and the 8 gen 1+
Not so sure about the 8G1, it didn't seem to be much different from 2200 except graphics.

I'm pretty sure Exynos bad reputation comes from older models, like the one in the S20 models.

I didn't buy the Exynos S22 for a different reason: I wanted the improved Qualcomm X65 modem.

 
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
432 (0.16/day)
Processor Ryzen 5700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 Arous Elite V2
Cooling Thermalright PA120
Memory Kingston FURY Renegade 3600Mhz @ 3733 tight timings
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 6800
Storage 36TB
Display(s) Samsung QN90A
Case be quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
Audio Device(s) Khadas Tone Pro 2, HD660s, KSC75, JBL 305 MK1
Power Supply Coolermaster V850 Gold V2
Mouse Roccat Burst Pro
Keyboard Dogshit with Otemu Brown
Software W10 LTSC 2021
whats with forcing sensational titles with things like "super core", its nothing new
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
549 (0.13/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name Black Knight | White Queen
Processor Intel Core i9-10940X (28 cores) | Intel Core i7-5775C (8 cores)
Motherboard ASUS ROG Rampage VI Extreme Encore X299G | ASUS Sabertooth Z97 Mark S (White)
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 chromax.black | Xigmatek Dark Knight SD-1283 Night Hawk (White)
Memory G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 4x8GB DDR4 3600MHz CL16 | Corsair Vengeance LP 4x4GB DDR3L 1600MHz CL9 (White)
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 4090 OC | KFA2/Galax GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Hall of Fame Edition
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB, 980 Pro 1TB, 850 Pro 256GB, 840 Pro 256GB, WD 10TB+ (incl. VelociRaptors)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW2721D 240Hz| LG OLED evo C4 48" 144Hz
Case Corsair 7000D AIRFLOW (Black) | NZXT ??? w/ ASUS DRW-24B1ST
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Essence STX | Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 1250W 85+ | Super Flower Leadex Gold 650W (White)
Mouse Razer Basilisk Ultimate, Razer Naga Trinity | Razer Mamba 16000
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Chroma V2 (Orange switch) | Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Exynos is pile of sh*t. Still with 9 cores in total (3 big) won't reach A16, not to talk for the upcoming A17.
 
Joined
May 3, 2018
Messages
2,881 (1.19/day)
This is weird. SD Gen 3 will use A720 and A520 Cortex cores, why is this going to use A715 and A510. In fact why even bother if they are working on Exynos 2400 that is supposed to use the newer cores.

There are so many conflicting stories on Exynos being killed off, it's ridiculous.

Frankly I 'd much prefer if dimensity SoC made it's way into more Android phones.
 
Top