Intel Xeon W9-3495X Can Pull up to 1,900 Watts in Extreme OC Scenarios

[lexluthermiester]

So it'll still draw more power than an Epyc *and* will be slower. Yay. I refuse to be impressed by its stock performance.

Um, you are incorrect. NO stock EPYC CPU can get the Cinebench score shown in the article. Full fraking stop. You may continue not being impressed...

 

[Minus Infinity]

Wouldn't be much of an issue if it were powered by hydro wind or nuclear
Wish they never stopped building nuclear plants so energy efficient electrical outlet connected computers never became a thing.

And pigs might fly.

 

[Assimilator]

That's a YES, not a NO. Thanks for clarifying it.

And no, that post wasn't to make Intel look bad. It just triggered your need to defend Intel, which is... the usual.

I will defend anyone or any entity, anywhere, at anytime from accusations that are blatantly false, unfair, or irrelevant.

Any company trying to be environmental friendly, will go bankrupt.

You really don't understand how any of this works, do you?

 

[john_]

I will defend anyone or any entity, anywhere, at anytime from accusations that are blatantly false, unfair, or irrelevant.

Based on your wrong understand of what I wrote.

You really don't understand how any of this works, do you?

Oh, come on. This is the typical kind of reply "I know nothing, but I will post something that indicates I know better".
Feel free to enlighten us. But I bet you don't want to waste more time here. Right?

 

[lemonadesoda]

Water cooling. PC in the yellow box. After each benchmark completes, you need to run a bath.

 

[lexluthermiester]

Based on your wrong understand of what I wrote.


Oh, come on. This is the typical kind of reply "I know nothing, but I will post something that indicates I know better".
Feel free to enlighten us. But I bet you don't want to waste more time here. Right?

They're not wrong. You are clearly demonstrating a lack of understanding.

 

[john_]

They're not wrong. You are clearly demonstrating a lack of understanding.

Thank you, oh wise.
Maybe you can enlighten us, oh wise.

 

[unwind-protect]

Who thinks the Zen4 Threadripper 64 core will beat this with similar overclocking? Obviously the 96 core will, but it'll be interesting to see....

If AMD makes one, and when. Zen3 threadripper hasn't been a hit with hobbyists since it was later and the Pro line only.

(I actually prefer Threadripper Pro because I want registered RAM, but the pricing of the 5xxx TR Pro is not to my liking)

But EPYC on DDR5 will beat Intel badly.

 

[lexluthermiester]

But EPYC on DDR5 will beat Intel badly.

DDR5 is not magic sauce. If Epyc has the stuff to beat Xeon now that it will do so with DDR5. If it doesn't then "beat Intel badly" is silly statement.

 

[unwind-protect]

DDR5 is not magic sauce. If Epyc has the stuff to beat Xeon now that it will do so with DDR5. If it doesn't then "beat Intel badly" is silly statement.

It's not just DDR5, one generation of Zen is missing from EPYC right now.

 

[Tek-Check]

Here are comprehensive benchmarks, over 150 tests. EPYC is currently over 30% faster.
https://openbenchmarking.org/vs/Processor/2+x+AMD+EPYC+9554+64-Core,2+x+Intel+Xeon+Platinum+8490H