Uses the
RT chart as an example, LMAO!
Because that's the only scenario where it's taking the cake (besides low power consumption). Expected really some more objectivity from a
"Staff Member".
Also depends on
who is testing what. Just look a Linus's review. In his review the 2.5 years old (!) AMD 6800XT is totally smoking the 4070 in pure rasterization. 1080p =
14% faster, 1440p =
9% faster, 4K =
10% faster! And not to forget the 7900XT for just 170€ more, running circles around the 4700, even in
"ray traced glory".
Ray tracing performance doesn't even matter because of the low performance of the card it becomes unplayable anyways. The
low power consumption on the other hand is great, but it becomes meaningless because of the high price of the card. If you get the 6800XT for let's say 200€ (used ones go for way less) cheaper than the 4070 you have to play for
5.5 years (!) to make up for it (3hrs gaming a day). And that's a steep
calculation with 33.5 €cents per KW, any other place power is way cheaper.
TL;DR: the card is really good. It's not a shoe box like the 4090, 4080 & 4070Ti, it fits in every case. Power consumption is great.
Price is just horrible. Avoid for now. Wait for AMD 7800/XT. Might be the way better deal or at least put some pressure on Nvidia's consumer shafting price structure.