- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 8,284 (3.93/day)
System Name | Bragging Rights |
---|---|
Processor | Atom Z3735F 1.33GHz |
Motherboard | It has no markings but it's green |
Cooling | No, it's a 2.2W processor |
Memory | 2GB DDR3L-1333 |
Video Card(s) | Gen7 Intel HD (4EU @ 311MHz) |
Storage | 32GB eMMC and 128GB Sandisk Extreme U3 |
Display(s) | 10" IPS 1280x800 60Hz |
Case | Veddha T2 |
Audio Device(s) | Apparently, yes |
Power Supply | Samsung 18W 5V fast-charger |
Mouse | MX Anywhere 2 |
Keyboard | Logitech MX Keys (not Cherry MX at all) |
VR HMD | Samsung Oddyssey, not that I'd plug it into this though.... |
Software | W10 21H1, barely |
Benchmark Scores | I once clocked a Celeron-300A to 564MHz on an Abit BE6 and it scored over 9000. |
Exactly. It's not something even the richest, silliest consumer would be interested in and even as an SMB enterprise user it's just red flags in every way.Do people not realize this will never come to market and is just a PR stunt?
If I was trying to undercut the big storage vendors, I'd homebrew an all-flash server using enterprise-grade storage and it would be tiered for sure - There's absolutely no way a single array needs to be maxiumum performance all the time over its entire capacity (and I have serious doubts that Apex X21 controller would ever get close to managing such a feat, too).
You either want higest reasonable reliability/endurance, or you want the lowest cost/TB crap you can find and engineer in massive redundancy. Sabrent PCIe Gen4 consumer SSDs satisfy neither option!