• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Report: ASUS to Start Production of GPUs With No External Power Connectors

D

Deleted member 229121

Guest
These boards require custom chassis so there's no way this is going to enter mass production, unless other vendors sign on to what is effectively a proprietary standard - and I don't see that happening.

But that isn't an oversight from ASUS, it's a choice. A proprietary motherboard means you need a proprietary GPU, which locks you into the ASUS ecosystem. (Sure you can use a standard GPU with external power connectors, but why would you once you've bought into this concept?) Dell and the other OEMs figured this out decades ago and it seems ASUS wants a piece of that pie. Of course that goes against the openness and wide compatibility that the PC form factor engenders, but hey, who cares about that when you can make money selling shiny turds to idiots?

Yep. You gotta be part of that #ROGLIFE if you want the fancy cable-free GPU.

Hip Hop Rap GIF by SuperRareBears
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Messages
149 (0.12/day)
ATX is painfully obsolete... but it is not possible that MB makers develop new standard.

AMD, Intel, cooling companies (but primary producers, not brand names like TT or Corsair) and power supply producers must sit together and create new standard. Actually, two new standards: one highly integrated, to be used for laptops and small PCs - for that purpose, even ATX derivatives can be used successfully. Other for desktop PCs that will separate CPU and GPU, and enable easier cooling and power supply to both.

However, with desktop PC being dying breed, I do not see that happening any time soon. Also, nVidia, AMD and Intel can't just increase power consumption indefinitely... PCIe 5 and newer drives also increase consumption too much... That is simply not sustainable... Maybe back to basics and actually using engineering prowess, instead of just cramping MOAR of everything into smaller space will be needed... God forbid, what we are gonna to do ???
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
5,847 (0.81/day)
Location
Ikenai borderline!
System Name Firelance.
Processor Threadripper 3960X
Motherboard ROG Strix TRX40-E Gaming
Cooling IceGem 360 + 6x Arctic Cooling P12
Memory 8x 16GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Ventus 2X OC
Storage 2TB WD SN850X (boot), 4TB Crucial P3 (data)
Display(s) 3x AOC Q32E2N (32" 2560x1440 75Hz)
Case Enthoo Pro II Server Edition (Closed Panel) + 6 fans
Power Supply Fractal Design Ion+ 2 Platinum 760W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Razer Pro Type Ultra
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
ATX is painfully obsolete... but it is not possible that MB makers develop new standard.

AMD, Intel, cooling companies (but primary producers, not brand names like TT or Corsair) and power supply producers must sit together and create new standard. Actually, two new standards: one highly integrated, to be used for laptops and small PCs - for that purpose, even ATX derivatives can be used successfully. Other for desktop PCs that will separate CPU and GPU, and enable easier cooling and power supply to both.

However, with desktop PC being dying breed, I do not see that happening any time soon. Also, nVidia, AMD and Intel can't just increase power consumption indefinitely... PCIe 5 and newer drives also increase consumption too much... That is simply not sustainable... Maybe back to basics and actually using engineering prowess, instead of just cramping MOAR of everything into smaller space will be needed... God forbid, what we are gonna to do ???
It seems that NVIDIA is currently the only company that cares about building efficient chips, and even they overclock those to the bleeding edge. I blame Intel and AMD for setting that trend by making up for their poor CPU and GPU products respectively by clocking them so high, thus forcing the competition to do the same and creating an arms race of stupidity.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.21/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
It seems that NVIDIA is currently the only company that cares about building efficient chips, and even they overclock those to the bleeding edge. I blame Intel and AMD for setting that trend by making up for their poor CPU and GPU products respectively by clocking them so high, thus forcing the competition to do the same and creating an arms race of stupidity.
That's the most ridiculous statement I have heard today, total nonesense, if you're resolving Nvidia of blame and burning all else you need to remove those green tints asap, they're befuddling you and look a mess.

Wtaf am I kidding, I know your style.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,768 (0.30/day)
System Name Lailalo
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X Boosts to 4.95Ghz
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus (WIFI
Cooling Noctua
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) XFX 7900XT 20GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro Plus 1TB, Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper
Power Supply XPG 1000W
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
I like innovation but unless this is a standard agreed by all motherboard and GPU manufacturers and they are all going to be making parts and not charging a huge premium I'd never buy this platform because I'd be afraid of being locked in to a manufacturer.
Also generally means that price hikes will follow it. Especially if no one else adopts it. All there needs to be is a company that pulls an AMD Freesync to open it up and Asus will later be forced to adopt whatever standard the industry goes through.
 
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
599 (0.15/day)
Location
Germany
System Name Main Machine
Processor Intel i9-13900KS
Motherboard ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Apex
Cooling Water cooling, 2x EK-DDC 3.2 PWM, 1x360mm+1x240mm+1x120mm EK, Mora 360 Pro, EK-Quantum Velocity 2
Memory G.SKILL 32GB DDR5-7200, 7200J3445G16GX2-TZ5RS
Video Card(s) ASRock RX 7900 XTX Aqua
Storage 2x WD_BLACK SN850X 1TB und 2TB, 2x8TB Seagate Ironwolf
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27WQ 27inch 165Hz FreeSync Premium Pro
Case Cooler Master COSMOS C700P
Audio Device(s) Turtle Beach Elite Pro Tournament + Elite Pro TAC
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i 1600W Titanium
Mouse Logitech G903 LIGHTSPEED Wireless
Keyboard ROCCAT Ryos MK Pro
Software Win 11
May be a good idea for low power consuming GPUs but not best for example for high end Nvidia and AMD cards where you can push nowadays up to 700-800W over even higher. :p
The motherboard need to deliver that amount of power over it which will increase the motherboard cost as they need to design thicker copper power plane inside the PCB to deliver that high power.

When I am Ocing my 7900XTX, I have seen power up to 850W being pulled at the PCIe connector using the WireView from Thermal Grizzly. :roll:
Like we have nowadays sometimes melting GPU power cables and connectors, maybe we will have burning mainboards. :eek:

As an overlocker I will not buy such motherboard.
Just for reference, I need to real push the 7900XTX and let it consume power like hell to get this top 2nd place in Time Spy. :D
 
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Messages
149 (0.12/day)
May be a good idea for low power consuming GPUs but not best for example for high end Nvidia and AMD cards where you can push nowadays up to 700-800W over even higher. :p
The motherboard need to deliver that amount of power over it which will increase the motherboard cost as they need to design thicker copper power plane inside the PCB to deliver that high power.

When I am Ocing my 7900XTX, I have seen power up to 850W being pulled at the PCIe connector using the WireView from Thermal Grizzly. :roll:
Like we have nowadays sometimes melting GPU power cables and connectors, maybe we will have burning mainboards. :eek:

As an overlocker I will not buy such motherboard.
Just for reference, I need to real push the 7900XTX and let it consume power like hell to get this top 2nd place in Time Spy. :D
Yes, further integration with such high-powered components is no go. I think that we need to go another route - separation of components in separate chambers, modular build that allows to add separate chamber for gpu - if you use high powered gpu, separate set for expansion slots, separate area for cpu... Integration for thin and light, modular approach for desktops and workstations...
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
5,556 (0.96/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k -> 12600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0 -> Gigabyte Z690 Auros Elite DDR4
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120 -> Custom Watercoolingloop
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz -> Crucial (8x2) 16gb 3600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480 -> RX7800XT
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb -> 2tb MVMe SSD
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television) -> Dell S3220DGF
Case antec 600 -> Thermaltake Tenor HTCP case
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Best of luck to those wanting to sell their card on the second hand market.

This is why 12VHPWR was introduced, to slim down on cables.

this can be a minor problem if they would just release a compatible riser cable with its own power connectors.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
52 (0.01/day)
PC GAMING/Editing... here's the future IMO->
We're going to see a separate "box" that comprises basically all the hardware except storage as an ADDON, main processing device. Think of an XBox Series S but without the SSD. SO:
1) You buy a really BASIC computer that serves you for web browsing, office tasks etc.
2) You setup all the SOFTWARE. You don't want to build a new PC from scratch.
3) You buy a new "box" that comprises a SoC/APU and shared memory (just like a game console)
4) Plug it in. It just works.
NOTE: this would work with basically ANY existing computer, and ignoring SSD asset streaming even a USB2 connection would be sufficient as the game content for most games just gets moved over to the shared memory. You attach the MONITOR to the new box... for NEWER computers that act as the core PC you can make this work even better. Have an 80Gbps USB4 connection for fast SSD asset streaming, and for laptops have the video going back through to the laptop screen.

Want to upgrade? Sell the box which would be easy to test since it's self-contained and ideally just runs it's own standalone diagnostic. Buy a new one. Plug it in.

Many PROS and CONS but it would work well for many people. I know people who just want to game and do video editing and would like to just spend $500 and plug in the thing (whatever, they don't know) and have it just work. The SIZE would be far smaller than a normal PC as there's no wasted space. Basically similar to a graphics card in a box shape. The COST if this caught on would be cheaper. Less shipping costs. Less wasted material. Less cooling.

Microsoft could actually just release the next XBOX as a device like this if they wanted to. Same exact hardware just a different box and connectivity, although they have obligations in the hardware space that make this complicated. VALVE would be someone I'd actually love to see do this but using Linux. I even have a name. We could call it the "Steam Machine!"
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2011
Messages
433 (0.09/day)
I'm all in for the VGAs with extra power slot pinout - its nothing especially new to do. Servers have custom risers with that kind of design for decades - you supply power to the board/riser not the card itself and it works splendidly. No need to entangle the GPU with web of power cables.

I don't like all connectors at the back. It has to be ironclad standardized thing or its DOA. Furthermore its less costly to manufacture with everything on one side (like right now) than complicate the design even further with power connectors on the other side of PCB. You'll need excellent cable management so plugs won't cook/unplug themselves. Usually at the back of the case there is no airflow, which in age of 700W Intel CPUs, and 600W GPUs... in one word: hot.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,610 (1.69/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
I said it already in this thread, but there actually is an attempt at standardization. Don’t know why TPU editors keep ignoring this.





If you look deep into CES coverage, including some of the coverage here, you could find close to a dozen cases supporting this diy-ape/ytx standard. TPU editors ought to know this and refer to their own coverage. I get that you guys don’t seem to have board meetings but come on…

This is not an endorsement of whatever this is, ATX needs a complete overhaul and board partners should lead the way, but not just so they can hide cables.
Why does it need a overhaul and why is it better to not have cables?

Looking at those articles they about putting connectors on the back not adding GPU power fully via PCIe.

I'm all in for the VGAs with extra power slot pinout - its nothing especially new to do. Servers have custom risers with that kind of design for decades - you supply power to the board/riser not the card itself and it works splendidly. No need to entangle the GPU with web of power cables.

I don't like all connectors at the back. It has to be ironclad standardized thing or its DOA. Furthermore its less costly to manufacture with everything on one side (like right now) than complicate the design even further with power connectors on the other side of PCB. You'll need excellent cable management so plugs won't cook/unplug themselves. Usually at the back of the case there is no airflow, which in age of 700W Intel CPUs, and 600W GPUs... in one word: hot.
I have 2 cables going into my GPU, hardly a web. ;)

For all those saying ATX is dead/obsolete etc. please state why. Change shouldnt be done because we got bored. I will always see the problem as the devices are being released as a too high power device, the future is less energy usage not energy sucking machines.

Do people really hate cables that much?
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,373 (0.57/day)
System Name boomer--->zoomer not your typical millenial build
Processor i5-760 @ 3.8ghz + turbo ~goes wayyyyyyyyy fast cuz turboooooz~
Motherboard P55-GD80 ~best motherboard ever designed~
Cooling NH-D15 ~double stack thot twerk all day~
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix LP ~memory gone AWOL~
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 ~*~GOLDEN EDITION~*~ RAWRRRRRR
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo (OS X, *nix), 128GB Samsung 840 Pro (W10 Pro), 1TB SpinPoint F3 ~best in class
Display(s) ASUS VW246H ~best 24" you've seen *FULL HD* *1O80PP* *SLAPS*~
Case FT02-W ~the W stands for white but it's brushed aluminum except for the disgusting ODD bays; *cries*
Audio Device(s) A LOT
Power Supply 850W EVGA SuperNova G2 ~hot fire like champagne~
Mouse CM Spawn ~cmcz R c00l seth mcfarlane darawss~
Keyboard CM QF Rapid - Browns ~fastrrr kees for fstr teens~
Software integrated into the chassis
Benchmark Scores 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
Why does it need a overhaul
Because it is dated and inefficient for not only cooling but pci expansion. You can fancy lower power usage but that’s not the reality for high-end components and, if you do want low power, there’s plenty of standard components and even smaller pre-builts available for that.
and why is it better to not have cables?
I explicitly said I do not endorse whatever this is, you even quoted that part? It was a don’t at me for being the messenger disclaimer
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
3,610 (1.69/day)
Location
UK, Midlands
System Name Main PC
Processor 13700k
Motherboard Asrock Z690 Steel Legend D4 - Bios 13.02
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 4080 RTX SUPER FE 16G
Storage 1TB 980 PRO, 2TB SN850X, 2TB DC P4600, 1TB 860 EVO, 2x 3TB WD Red, 2x 4TB WD Red
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-9
Power Supply Antec HCG 750 Gold
Software Windows 10 21H2 LTSC
Can you please explain how it is inefficient compared to going internally via the board.

There is already a system available for high power guzzling components, it has recently been delivered via a new standard. Also I think this will be a temporary fad like we seen in the past where occasionally the manufacturers get stuck and resort to crazy power consumption, then they will figure something out and it will drop again.

This time there is risk of intervention from regulators though e.g. hoover's got regulated in the UK to lower power consumption as their peak power got too high.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2013
Messages
2,373 (0.57/day)
System Name boomer--->zoomer not your typical millenial build
Processor i5-760 @ 3.8ghz + turbo ~goes wayyyyyyyyy fast cuz turboooooz~
Motherboard P55-GD80 ~best motherboard ever designed~
Cooling NH-D15 ~double stack thot twerk all day~
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix LP ~memory gone AWOL~
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 ~*~GOLDEN EDITION~*~ RAWRRRRRR
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo (OS X, *nix), 128GB Samsung 840 Pro (W10 Pro), 1TB SpinPoint F3 ~best in class
Display(s) ASUS VW246H ~best 24" you've seen *FULL HD* *1O80PP* *SLAPS*~
Case FT02-W ~the W stands for white but it's brushed aluminum except for the disgusting ODD bays; *cries*
Audio Device(s) A LOT
Power Supply 850W EVGA SuperNova G2 ~hot fire like champagne~
Mouse CM Spawn ~cmcz R c00l seth mcfarlane darawss~
Keyboard CM QF Rapid - Browns ~fastrrr kees for fstr teens~
Software integrated into the chassis
Benchmark Scores 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
Can you please explain how it is inefficient compared to going internally via the board.
I don’t know what you mean by “going internally via the board,” but I outlined my thoughts in the last post. I don’t think it makes sense for GPU cooling and don’t think it makes sense that so many pci slots are inaccessible. I also don’t think the vast majority of users need more than one slot though, so who I am to judge. ITX makes sense for most people, and sandwich cases are basically what I incision as the best alternative, only with pci slots on the back rather than using ribbon cables.
There is already a system available for high power guzzling components, it has recently been delivered via a new standard.
What’s all this, don’t think I know what you’re referring to, sounds interesting
Also I think this will be a temporary fad like we seen in the past where occasionally the manufacturers get stuck and resort to crazy power consumption, then they will figure something out and it will drop again.
Maybe, but I don’t think giant GPU coolers are going anywhere, and kind of hope they don’t (they’re so quiet!).
This time there is risk of intervention from regulators though e.g. hoover's got regulated in the UK to lower power consumption as their peak power got too high.
I cannot imagine this being the case as long as everyone is so dependent on giant data centers.
 
Top