D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
max voltage limit 0.9v
tdp limit 90w from 125w
same performances?
tdp limit 90w from 125w
same performances?
-
Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,648 (4.92/day)
- Location
- Russian Wild West
| System Name | D.L.S.S. (Die Lekker Spoed Situasie) |
|---|---|
| Processor | i5-12400F |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte B760M DS3H |
| Cooling | Laminar RM1 |
| Memory | 32 GB DDR4-3200 |
| Video Card(s) | RX 6700 XT (vandalised) |
| Storage | Yes. |
| Display(s) | MSi G2712 |
| Case | Matrexx 55 (slightly vandalised) |
| Audio Device(s) | Yes. |
| Power Supply | Thermaltake 1000 W |
| Mouse | Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress... |
| Keyboard | Makes some noise. Probably onto something. |
| VR HMD | I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one. |
| Software | Windows 11 / 10 / 8 |
| Benchmark Scores | My PC can run Crysis. Do I really need more than that? |
I achieved something similar with my old 1070 four years ago. ~110 W (of 150) at 99% of stock performance.
D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
one second I'm uploading video...
In your opinion, how much can we go further down without compromising performance? what voltage?
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,648 (4.92/day)
- Location
- Russian Wild West
| System Name | D.L.S.S. (Die Lekker Spoed Situasie) |
|---|---|
| Processor | i5-12400F |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte B760M DS3H |
| Cooling | Laminar RM1 |
| Memory | 32 GB DDR4-3200 |
| Video Card(s) | RX 6700 XT (vandalised) |
| Storage | Yes. |
| Display(s) | MSi G2712 |
| Case | Matrexx 55 (slightly vandalised) |
| Audio Device(s) | Yes. |
| Power Supply | Thermaltake 1000 W |
| Mouse | Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress... |
| Keyboard | Makes some noise. Probably onto something. |
| VR HMD | I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one. |
| Software | Windows 11 / 10 / 8 |
| Benchmark Scores | My PC can run Crysis. Do I really need more than that? |
I think anything lower than 870 mV will be unstable at stock clocks. Still, silicon lottery to consider.
D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
how many watts do you want to read?
by cheating on power sensor I can get the numbers you want but it would be a fake.
however I still have to test if 0.875v is stable on timespy stress test...
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2023
- Messages
- 3,648 (4.92/day)
- Location
- Russian Wild West
| System Name | D.L.S.S. (Die Lekker Spoed Situasie) |
|---|---|
| Processor | i5-12400F |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte B760M DS3H |
| Cooling | Laminar RM1 |
| Memory | 32 GB DDR4-3200 |
| Video Card(s) | RX 6700 XT (vandalised) |
| Storage | Yes. |
| Display(s) | MSi G2712 |
| Case | Matrexx 55 (slightly vandalised) |
| Audio Device(s) | Yes. |
| Power Supply | Thermaltake 1000 W |
| Mouse | Don't disturb, cheese eating in progress... |
| Keyboard | Makes some noise. Probably onto something. |
| VR HMD | I live in real reality and don't need a virtual one. |
| Software | Windows 11 / 10 / 8 |
| Benchmark Scores | My PC can run Crysis. Do I really need more than that? |
1969: people are reading books.
2023: people are reading power.
D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
stable but is limited by 90w, voltage varies between 0.8-0.82v, I can still improve, I have margin...
S.N.N.
the Wall!!!
it's not much... about 200 pts of timespy less without touching vram. it takes about 95w for a draw with a little more voltage. assuming that watts shown are real and I have my doubts.
I noticed that during timespy stress test, probably due to increase in temps of VRMs, around 3-4W of efficiency was lost.
S.N.N.
the Wall!!!
it's not much... about 200 pts of timespy less without touching vram. it takes about 95w for a draw with a little more voltage. assuming that watts shown are real and I have my doubts.
I noticed that during timespy stress test, probably due to increase in temps of VRMs, around 3-4W of efficiency was lost.
Attachments
-
timespy.jpg
Last edited by a moderator:
D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
I tried replacing thermal paste on 1660S and the situation improved by 1-2°.
now it passes the stresstest with stock bios, before it failed with 80-81°.
I also tried the carbon thermal pad which gives -1° more than paste but I have now removed it.
However, I believe the solution is permanent undervolt.
now it passes the stresstest with stock bios, before it failed with 80-81°.
I also tried the carbon thermal pad which gives -1° more than paste but I have now removed it.
However, I believe the solution is permanent undervolt.
Attachments
-
3DMarkTimeSpy_2023_12_05_11_44_42_754.jpg -
pass.jpg
D
Deleted member 182555
Guest
with 100w the performances are practically the same, but with 70° and without fan noise.
this 1660 super mini is not that great.
maybe it can be improved further, however in a long gaming session it should be even better, average clock +35mhz .
from the third lap efficiency begins to degrade
stabilized with some small adjustments... 1935mhz 0.825v and it never goes down, effective speed is 1950->1927mhz, temps +1°. next step 1995 but I don't think it will be possible without raising voltage.
this 1660 super mini is not that great.
maybe it can be improved further, however in a long gaming session it should be even better, average clock +35mhz .
from the third lap efficiency begins to degrade
stabilized with some small adjustments... 1935mhz 0.825v and it never goes down, effective speed is 1950->1927mhz, temps +1°. next step 1995 but I don't think it will be possible without raising voltage.
Last edited by a moderator: