I was kind of shocked when I saw this one.
Was that
shockingly bad for you?
He talks about increasing frequency over the previous gen. and overclocking the CPU, when even those frequencies of the previous gen. are extremely high and far away from the reasonable efficient frequency based on the older process Intel makes these CPUs on.
The processor out of the box is an
extreme power hog and he even wants to make it worse by oveclocking it more?!
He boasts about AI overclocking software and how it performed wonderfuly in the games after overclocking, and then the videos of the gameplay show 5700MHz, which is a stock speed?
And why is he talking about extremely expensice PCIE 5th gen SSDs, when you
SHOULD NOT USE such SSDs on the LGA1700 platform, because it steals lanes from a graphic card? 4th gen SSDs are still good enough.
And what about the results being compared to nothing else on the market? Is there any sense in presenting these numbers alone???
Why is Intel not trying to be more reasonable in advertising??? They decided not to innovate, they decided to make the same CPU again instead of really improving it, they decided to make it on an old process, which runs reasonably efficiently on frequencies only up to 5 GHz, and
after all these mistakes they are trying to undo them by silly advertising and applying crazy stock frequencies and power limits?
Is it not normal to be the second one after you put out a low (no) effort product? Why to try to appear being nr.1?
I see I used "extremely" many times in this text, perhaps because I am extremely pissed off by Intel even after all their mistakes making
QUITE GOOD and usable processors and then trying hard to destroy (melt) them.