• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Strix OC

W1zzard

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
28,892 (3.74/day)
System Specs
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
The ASUS GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super STRIX OC is equipped with the strongest cooler among all the cards we've tested. It features a dual BIOS with quiet mode, a second HDMI port and a substantial factory overclock, but does come with a pretty high price tag.

Show full review
 
Rather pick the TUF...
 
XFX 7900XT.jpg

SapphireNitro7900XT.jpg
AsusRog4070TiSuper.jpg

Noooooo :( it was one of my possible GPU for ”mid-range”. For this price i could get the 7900XTX... What is wrong with NVIDIA.
AMD XFX 7900XT : €850
AMD Sapphire Nitro+ 7900 XT : €900
NVIDIA Asus GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ROG STRIX O16G GAMING : 1099€
(FR VAT RETAILS)
MGS5.png
 
Just checked Newegg .. $950 .. charts and conclusion have been updated accordingly. Awards "Recommended" "But Expensive" have both been removed
 
Ti Super Strix OC

This technically makes sense, but come on, it is just a bit funny.
 
W1zzard said:
Just checked Newegg .. $950 .. charts and conclusion have been updated accordingly. Awards "Recommended" "But Expensive" have both been removed
Click to expand...
ASUS is out of their mind; this is encroaching on the 4080 Super. Who wouldn't pay $50 more and get a much faster card?
 
So much unused space underneat the shroud, ASUS just want's to have the biggest looking cards but 50% is a empty plastic shell.
 
"RTX 3090 Ti launched for $2000, now you can get identical performance for $800 with the RTX 4070 Ti Super."

Not for gamers it didn't. These comparisons with prices that shoot up when cryprogamblers were buying cards by pallets have absolutely no sense. But the sad reality is that three and a half years since Nvidia announced RTX 3080 at $699 they still can't beat that performance per dollar.

Let that sink in.
 
AnotherReader said:
ASUS is out of their mind; this is encroaching on the 4080 Super. Who wouldn't pay $50 more and get a much faster card?
Click to expand...

I think everyone’s in for a rude awakening when every AIB 4080s starts at $1100 and decent models are $1200 (which means asus will be $1300-1400). Msrp means nothing, especially when it comes to Nvidia cards lately.

Also, it’s ASUS, no one should be surprised by the ASUS tax.
 
Is this the worst STRIX card ever relative to comparable models? No gains in temperatures or noise for $150 more than MSRP.
 
Honestly, you'd have to be an idiot to buy gpu's that are considerably over msrp, unless you are buying the very highest end model. In this case you might aswell get a 4080 super tuf for 50 usd more, or a 4070 ti super tuf for 150 usd less.

Summed up : terrible value
 
Dragam1337 said:
Honestly, you'd have to be an idiot to buy gpu's that are considerably over msrp, unless you are buying the very highest end model. In this case you might aswell get a 4080 super tuf for 50 usd more, or a 4070 ti super tuf for 150 usd less.

Summed up : terrible value
Click to expand...
ROG tax at its finest.
 
Regarding the Asus Tuf: The RTX 4070 S is more expensive. The 4070 TS is at MSRP. The 4070 TS Strix is way above MSRP.

The 4070 TS Tuf is just a great deal. It is the only great cooler you can get at MSRP, especially from Asus. I wonder how long that will last.

It's basically like being able to buy the 4070 Ti Super at $700 or $750 instead of $800 if you include the upgrade cost of the Tuf cooler.

I feel like we are being manipulated again. It makes NVidia look good, it makes Asus look good, but for how long does the RTX 4070 Ti Super TUF stay on sale for that price.
 
AnotherReader said:
ASUS is out of their mind; this is encroaching on the 4080 Super. Who wouldn't pay $50 more and get a much faster card?
Click to expand...
They've been pulling this nonsense for decades now; Take a cheaper product, slap a lot of lipstick on it and price it like silicon a whole tier higher.

Strix is their maximum cost, flagship branding for top performance - yet there's nothing performant about a $950 GPU that's 20% slower than the common $1000 GPUs.
 
What a majestic card. This design will never not impress me. I hope ASUS keeps it around with Blackwell, even if they have to call it the Strix Classic.

AnotherReader said:
ASUS is out of their mind; this is encroaching on the 4080 Super. Who wouldn't pay $50 more and get a much faster card?
Click to expand...

The 4080 Strix was strikingly close to the 4090's price, the special OC White model was literally $1550 (and I paid close to that on mine, a good price all things considered especially with the import taxes and distributor costs - except 4090's here in Brazil start at around $2000).

Chrispy_ said:
Strix is their maximum cost, flagship branding for top performance - yet there's nothing performant about a $950 GPU that's 20% slower than the common $1000 GPUs.
Click to expand...

Think of a Dudalina or Balenciaga shirt and one you buy from Target or Walmart. Both will do the job. Both are made of cotton. But one is expensive, and the other is not. Why would anyone buy the former? I mean, yeah. It's not an affordable card but it doesn't have to be. It's the kind of thing you buy because you can, and yes, I'll even concede buying a higher end, less fancy model is a good idea - but perhaps, it's not really required, and this card exists to fill in that niche.
 
non sense GPU is non sense...
you pay the same for a 4080S
 
Dr. Dro said:
Think of a Dudalina or Balenciaga shirt and one you buy from Target or Walmart. Both will do the job. Both are made of cotton. But one is expensive, and the other is not. Why would anyone buy the former? I mean, yeah. It's not an affordable card but it doesn't have to be. It's the kind of thing you buy because you can, and yes, I'll even concede buying a higher end, less fancy model is a good idea - but perhaps, it's not really required, and this card exists to fill in that niche.
Click to expand...
Shirts are largely cosmetic. Sure there are minor differences in the grade of cotton which have an impact on comfort but 99% the cost of a fancy shirt is about cosmetics and not performance.

Graphics cards are priced by performance, not cosmetic appeal. If that weren't true, you'd have more diamond-studded GT1030s selling at $2000.

A better clothing analogy would be a performance-focused one - why buy a $300 fashion-focused rain jacket from Nike that's just polyester and cheap spray-coating with a 3000mm water resistance, when you could buy an off-brand proper rain jacket with a dedicated Gore-tex membrane, 15000mm resistance rating, and fully taped seams. In the middle of a downpour, that Nike logo isn't doing anything with your money to keep you dry.

Now pretend it's not a downpour, but an attempt to reach 60fps at 4K in whatever AAA game you are trying to run. If you'd bought a 4080 Super instead of a blinged-out 4070 TiS you'd have that extra 20% performance to actually hit that target.
 
So same speed as XT in raster and 30% faster than XTX when full Rt is turned on (CP2077).

amd needs to cut prices a lot
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top