Ugh, I know it's just reviewers getting given the flagship products to review for marketing reasons but $100 for 3 fans is really getting silly.
They look like good fans, but I'm accustomed to paying £50 for 3 good fans, and rarely spend that much because £15 gets you 3
good-enough ARGB PWM FDB fans. It's rare that I can justify upspending to the premium £50 fan pack and doubling the cost again to £/$/€100 for fans that are tested as middle-of-the-road among other premium fans makes these a very hard sell.
I guess I shouldn't care; ARGBLED vanity builds usually throw performance/$ out of the window and come with bling-tax anyway. Anyone focused on pretty lights probably doesn't care about value because ARGBLED fans as a category are already worse fans at higher price by default. I suppose the fact that these ARGB fans
aren't significantly worse than their non-ARGB LCP counterparts makes them valuable to people with infinite budgets who want it all. Realistically, you're going to have at least four of these in a PC, more likely 7+
Also, Come on Seasonic....it should be S.O.P. to have a white option
Harder to do with LCP, the Sterox blades always seem to look dirty, which is part of the manufacturing process I guess
Just curious if you measured gap (blade tip to housing)? Noctua likes to point out their "tight" clearance on their NF-A12x25 fan.............
Not sure if it's diminishing returns on PC fans?
I'm sure it is diminishing returns - there's the whole aeronautics wingtip vortices considerations but there comes a point when the vortices are so small proportional to the air being moved by the fan that they become lost in the noise.
Fans are usually given RPM specs +/- 10% because the variance sample to sample is so great - I'd be amazed if the difference of 0.5mm and 1.0mm gap was enough to even show up between two samples or be completely dwarfed by the sample-to-sample variance.