GravityMark v1.87 GPU Benchmark

[Tellusim]

New iOS and Android versions now include Ray Tracing and Mesh Shading.

 

[tugrul_SIMD]

4k res

2k res

 

[Tellusim]

20,000 leaderboard records!

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

 

[AMF]

number 13

 

[Paramount]

 

[venturi]

A different motherboard can be a reason. Cuda cannot create shared textures for GPUs. Do you have the Resizable Bar enabled?

Yes sir, resizable bar is Enabled.
I have the new high score, (no overclocking or anything like that), however it would be higher if the CU would work.

Any help?

THX

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

 

[Marcus Vinicus]

 

[venturi]

Yes sir, resizable bar is Enabled.
I have the new high score, (no overclocking or anything like that), however it would be higher if the CU would work.

Any help?

THX

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

So, same 4090 FE cards from the Sage dual mobo *where CU worked" now on AMD dual 7773x the
CU does not work. Same error as reported. System capabilities , OS. settings, etc are the same, in fact the load is a restored load from prior mobo and or a new load, set up the same, yields same result.

All devices are recognized, appropriately installed, dual GPU set up correctly, dual CPUs set up correctly, Resizable BAR is enabled, 4G parameter correct, IOMMU correct, PCIe at Maximum (4+) etc

....but CU for this app wont go, but CU for other app / endeavors / algorithms does work. On version 1.82 for windows, latest driver (552.12), lean install - no GFE, no bloat, no unwanted background tasks.

No heating issues (air cooled in a SFF case CPU temps range from idle 25C to load 39C, video card temps from 25C to 50C under extreme load), ram temp 31C to 48C) I can't figure it out. I don't think its anything hardware or OS as -

-I was able to get the high score on Gravitymark (I don't overclock) but without CU. Historically CU gave a 2-5% boost.


So I am perplexed, I did all the reasonable and logical troubleshooting. any insight?

CU works in other apps

System Spec:
2x 4090 RTX Founders Edition
2x AMD 7773x Epyc (128/256 cores), Gigabyte MZ72-HB0 Dual socket motherboard
1 TB RAM DDR4 ECC LRDIMMs 1600W digital power supply
(Data drive) Raid 0 Micron 9300 Max (15.4TB each / 77TB array - overprovisioned to 64TB)
(OS Drive) Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus (8TB). 2x Back up drives Micron 5300
Asus PA32UCG-K monitor, MS Data Center 2022 & Ubuntu, Air cooled, cool temps, SFF case, ultra quiet operation

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

 

[freeagent]

Chuggin along..

 

[venturi]

So, same 4090 FE cards from the Sage dual mobo *where CU worked" now on AMD dual 7773x the
CU does not work. Same error as reported. System capabilities , OS. settings, etc are the same, in fact the load is a restored load from prior mobo and or a new load, set up the same, yields same result.

All devices are recognized, appropriately installed, dual GPU set up correctly, dual CPUs set up correctly, Resizable BAR is enabled, 4G parameter correct, IOMMU correct, PCIe at Maximum (4+) etc

....but CU for this app wont go, but CU for other app / endeavors / algorithms does work. On version 1.82 for windows, latest driver (552.12), lean install - no GFE, no bloat, no unwanted background tasks.

No heating issues (air cooled in a SFF case CPU temps range from idle 25C to load 39C, video card temps from 25C to 50C under extreme load), ram temp 31C to 48C) I can't figure it out. I don't think its anything hardware or OS as -

-I was able to get the high score on Gravitymark (I don't overclock) but without CU. Historically CU gave a 2-5% boost.


So I am perplexed, I did all the reasonable and logical troubleshooting. any insight?

CU works in other apps

System Spec:
2x 4090 RTX Founders Edition
2x AMD 7773x Epyc (128/256 cores), Gigabyte MZ72-HB0 Dual socket motherboard
1 TB RAM DDR4 ECC LRDIMMs 1600W digital power supply
(Data drive) Raid 0 Micron 9300 Max (15.4TB each / 77TB array - overprovisioned to 64TB)
(OS Drive) Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus (8TB). 2x Back up drives Micron 5300
Asus PA32UCG-K monitor, MS Data Center 2022 & Ubuntu, Air cooled, cool temps, SFF case, ultra quiet operation

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

View attachment 342697


View attachment 342704

Sir
I have not had CUDA issues with other apps, I was wondering if you could look into possible solutions to resolve the CU issue?

Thank you

 

[Athlonite]

New mobo ram and cpu but worse result

 

[venturi]

New mobo ram and cpu but worse result

View attachment 343665

View attachment 343666

So a lot of things could be going on:

MS updates since your original score
Driver updates/regressions since your original attempt.
Configuration:
HAGS
NVME / SSD drive cache settings
Video Driver caching
OS settings (likely),
so many - from telemetry to background tasks, MS store, etc etc. (all bad things)


and quite significantly: Motherboard BIOS settings (most likely).
Resizable BAR
Memory timings
CPU settings
Bios security settings
Overclock settings (more is gained from correct configuration than any overclock)



Start with the BIOS settings and work your way up to your OS settings

I use this bench to weed out any potential issues on my rig (with no overclocking) you should be able to get a higher score without overclocking, then when all is purring correctly, try your overclock if you need too.

But don't take my word for it, ....go see what obvious differences come to mind between your first and second build

 

[Tellusim]

The new GravityMark version for ARM64 Windows is ready

 

[Athlonite]

DX12 RT

Vulcan RT

 

[Tellusim]

v1.87 is live on all platform! It is time for new records.
Benchmark version selection will be deployed soon.

 

[Arctucas]

 

[freeagent]

I just spammed a bunch!

Easy money

 

[venturi]

So new high score:
144,742

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

getting ready for dual 5090, Functional protype on dual 4090

Well, I had forgotten to post the upgrade I did about a year ago, now I'm getting ready for dual 5090. So I figured I'd show the barebones of the system minus the mesh face. Core Specs: 2x 4090 RTX Founders Edition 2x AMD 7773x Epyc (128/256 cores), Gigabyte MZ72-HB0 Dual socket motherboard...

www.techpowerup.com

 

[Tellusim]

So new high score:
144,742

 

[AMF]

10 BIT COLOR HDR10+

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Hardware: Intel 12700KF (stock) -- G.SKILL RIPJAWS @3600 CL18 (stock) -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- ASRock B760M-ITX/D4 WiFi -- fractal design DEFINE NANO S -- bequiet! SYSTEM POWER 10 550W -- DeepCool AG500BK ARGB -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, PeKWM, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system

I can score a little higher than this result because I had let the GPU run very warm before the test started.

In my new system, the same GPU makes a totally different noise than in the previous setup (I use a different motherboard/PSU/case/RAM)
The GPU is very close to the PSU. +- 3 mm distance. Can it create an extremely loud noise like a vacuum cleaner when the fans go to 100% speed?
Fortunately, when I use a 60 FPS limit I don't have this problem in games because the GPU doesn't draw as much power.

I also find it odd that the RX 7600 is so underrepresented in the results.

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

This GPU is the same price point as the old GTX 1060 6GB which was the most popular GPU for many years. I would think that the RX 7600 would be among the results more often.

This was the result for the second test I did.

It seems like I could be the first RX 7600 user who uploads a result for GravityMark.

GravityMark Leaderboard

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

 

[AMF]

 

[SchumannFrequency]

Something that strikes me is that most other results from similar GPUs never score higher than 100 in the MIN FPS values.

#1 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=19e42529d2a054b8d35fd8fc3151a54f322141ea
#2 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=a8bc80d8f6dbd2ce071acc7d83322757d4c419ae
#3 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=b8f9eac311e426691f0a9f8f8f2aa4fd2724826b
#4 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=3be43de61cb8c651dc93d99b3b95a5eac2d00afb
#5 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=61b076e4ec3a4ba3c42e3b34a5c1c090b6cf4c22
#6 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=dedbf08f9e1b9fdf31760832d7d64b2317caa89e
#7 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=66988929e9fe40a7d7734e67c19cc3ad0b80c6ce

My result: https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=3e2a0922fd0c33556d787571ad28506d9f9bf9e4

I have no idea how important the min/max values of this test are.
But it is visible that people with an equally expensive RTX 3060 or with the very similar RX 6650 consistently achieve lower min fps values.

I use an ITX motherboard so you would expect lower performance from my build but it seems to be the other way around.

 

[:D:D]

So many options, not sure which to show. Here is an X99 with RTX 3070 result.

 

[SchumannFrequency]

I just ran the test again, this is the result.

GravityMark Report

GravityMark GPU Benchmark

gravitymark.tellusim.com

The Min/Max values are very consistent on every test.
It seems that many modern systems with more powerful GPU and decent CPU achieve lower minimum values.

Ryzen 7 5700X + RTX 3060 Ti: https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=634e37499290e7c3d57cd6b6f851549440e1c330
Min / Max 29.8 / 280.9

Ryzen 5 1600 + RX 6700 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=a68ade617812815ff50cc7b12dfd804639b6b445
Min / Max 53.8 / 311.8

Ryzen 9 3950X + RTX 2080 SUPER https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=3f8f7cca1b6e1c92f0502194434d4291df1f8ede
Min / Max 55.7 / 278.9

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9900K + AMD Radeon RX 6800 https://gravitymark.tellusim.com/report/?id=aaa293b33b9177efa3c2d01fb5df54be19963ae4
Min / Max 83.9 / 395.5

Perhaps it is the difference in CPU+RAM that explains this situation.